Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

A national embarrassment

 

OUR OPINION: Maximum transparency should be rule at Guantánamo

Guantánamo by the numbers:

• Total detainees over the years: 779, of whom seven were convicted by Military Commission

• Current detainee census: 155

• Designated for indefinite detention, no charge or trial: 45

• Approved for transfer: 77

• Other status: 33

• Last known arrival date: March 14, 2008.

• Last detainee transfer: Two Sudanese prisoners on Dec. 18.

• Last detainee resettlement: Three Uighur Muslim men to Slovakia on Dec. 30, 2013.

• Last convict departure: Dec. 18, 2013.


HeraldEd@MiamiHerald.com

Twelve years ago this week, 20 captives in the “war on terror” arrived at an isolated U.S. Navy base on the eastern tip of Cuba to inaugurate Camp X-Ray, opening a dismal chapter in the history of U.S. warfare and the treatment of detainees.

Over the years, it “has become a symbol around the world for an America that flouts the rule of law,” as President Obama declared in a speech on May 23. The makeshift facility at Guantánamo Bay was born of a desperate effort by the Bush administration to find a place to house the captives of the irregular war against organized terrorists that would be beyond the reach of the Geneva Conventions and the intrusions of obstreperous attorneys and nosy journalists.

It wasn’t long before the courts slapped down the notion of a U.S.-run prison that was literally lawless. Since its opening, four cases involving detainee rights have gone before the U.S. Supreme Court, and four times the justices have sided with the detainees, forcing the government to uphold legal obligations that afford the captives a measure of due process.

But even so, the prison is still there, housing 155 inmates, all but eight without trial, even as hundreds more terrorism suspects, from the “shoe bomber” to the “underwear bomber,” have been convicted in federal civil courts. But rather than heeding Mr. Obama’s pleas to close the prison, members of Congress have imposed restrictions that slowed the transfer of prisoners to a virtual standstill.

Meanwhile, attorneys do their best under Guantánamo’s frustrating rules of procedure to provide legal assistance to the captives, and journalists try to shed some light on the activities at the notorious prison — even as camp authorities erect new barriers against transparency.

Under Gen. John F. Kelly, commander of the U.S. Southern Command in Miami, institutional censorship has increased recently. Authorities no longer disclose the number of prisoners engaged in a camp-wide hunger strike, an embarrassment that once again focused unwanted attention on conditions at the prison.

In addition, the command imposed new rules that prohibit most soldiers from giving their names to reporters they talk to. In another instance, a military staff attorney assigned to the camp for ex-CIA captives was allowed to testify under a pseudonym — a mockery of genuine trial proceedings. Meanwhile, long-promised parole hearings finally got under way (in secrecy), but more than one month later, only part of the promised transcript of the pleadings has been made public.

The existence of Guantánamo is a national embarrassment, but erecting new barriers against news reporting will only make matters worse. As long as the prison exists, maximum transparency should be the operative rule.

Read more Editorials stories from the Miami Herald

  • Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Remember the deficit?

    OUR OPINION: Crisis over, long-term budget problem remains

  • Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    From tragedy to farce

    OUR OPINION: Latest Guantánamo disclosures further discredit the justice process

  • Worth a thousand words

    The Miami Herald Editorial Board shares the viewpoints of cartoonists from across the country in this Saturday feature called “Worth a Thousand Words.”

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category