Legislature cast difficult vote to fill budget hole



Recently Gov. Rick Scott announced his intention to cut the insidious car-tag fee increases that occurred five years ago. During his announcement in his opponent’s back yard of Tampa Bay, he hinted that he was reducing the taxes that his predecessor raised.

This is a smart political move, no doubt orchestrated by political consultants who hoped no one would notice it was fellow Republicans who crafted and then passed the bill to increase fees.

To understand the dynamics of the “Great Fee Hike of 2009,” a brief primer on Florida’s budget numbers and process is in order.

In 2007, during Charlie Crist’s tenure as governor, the state budget reached a high of $72 billion. By 2009, revenues were estimated to be a much lower $66.5 billion because of the recession.

Legislators preparing the budget tried to maximize spending in certain areas to obtain federal stimulus funds. After making severe cuts to many programs, some vital, legislators were still struggling to fill a $2 billion budget hole.

A desperate Republican-led Legislature had little choice but to temporarily raise fees and taxes to fill the gap. In all, they raised revenues $2.2 billion, including a $1-per-pack tax increase on cigarettes generating $935 million, and fee increases on certain court costs totaling $195 million.

The toughest vote was for increasing fees on drivers’ licenses and new car tags to generate $800 million. This was done in Senate Bill 1778, which passed 40-0, with all senators, Republican and Democratic alike, voting for the increase even though many did so with extreme reluctance.

In the Florida House the auto fee hike passed, 74-43, but it did so primarily along party lines, with one Republican joining 42 Democrats in dissent.

SB 1778 was sent to then-Gov. Crist along with the budget, known as the appropriations bill. It’s important to note that this was no ordinary bill; it was a conference committee report that was negotiated in the final days of session. The bill to increase fees was needed to enhance revenues so that they matched the amount of money spent in SB 2600, the appropriations bill.

Why is this important? If the governor had vetoed SB 1778, known as a conforming bill, it would have thrown the budget out of balance. In this case, the budget would have authorized spending $800 million in revenues that would not have been collected. At that point, it would have made sense to veto the entire budget. However, that would be highly unusual, particularly when the governor and legislative leaders were from the same political party.

In 2011, when state revenues were almost $70 billion, the Florida Senate wanted to roll back the 2009 fee increases but Gov. Scott was more interested in reducing corporate income taxes.

During the 2013 session, state Sen. Joe Negron, Appropriations Committee chair, introduced and passed Florida Senate SB 7132 to take revenue from eliminating a tax credit benefiting insurance companies and use it to reduce a portion of the auto fee increases. The Florida House refused to go along.

Gov. Scott didn’t weigh in.

In September, as legislators started preparing for the 2014 session, Gov. Scott expressed interest in reducing taxes by $500 million and began a listening tour to hear from the public how to do so. He also indicated that he had no list of what taxes and fees he had in mind to cut. It is estimated that there will be a surplus of at least $840 million above the $74.5 billion in the current budget.

During the October committee week, Senate Appropriations Chair Joe Negron introduced SB 156, again trying to reduce certain motor vehicle fees but this time using the surplus in general revenue funds.

Then in December, Gov. Scott announced his plan to cut $401 million in car and truck registration fees. If passed, it could save the average motorist about $25 a year, a very popular idea with reelection looming.

Senate President Don Gaetz welcomed the governor to Joe Negron’s bandwagon.

With more than an $8 billion increase in the state budget from 2009 to the present, isn’t it well past time to undo the fee increases that were supposed to be temporary?

The timing and location of the governor’s announcement, along with his inaction over the past three years, make the governor’s motives appear more opportunistic than sincere. It’s an insult and a disservice to the Republican legislators who took the tough but responsible vote to balance the budget.

Wouldn’t it be more honorable to be honest with voters rather than to try to deceive them for political gain?

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category