The readers’ forum

Lawyers shouldn’t have to give up right to free speech

 

Recently, the law firm of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley filed a federal lawsuit in Tallahassee against The Florida Bar. It claims that the Bar’s ethics rule restricting a law firm’s website content and postings on blogs was an unconstitutional infringement on the firm’s First Amendment rights.

As a practicing attorney for more than 30 years and a staunch defender of the First Amendment, not only do I support the law firm, but also find these rules to be archaic, arbitrary and an affront to the legal profession.

Attorneys are the protectors of our justice system and democracy. Courts have held that the First Amendment is the preeminent amendment. Yet, The Florida Bar mandates that lawyers give up those rights to speech when it comes to advertising, websites and blogging that other citizens enjoy. How can it be that those who are trained to protect freedoms enjoy fewer freedoms than others?

The age-old argument that attorney advertising is undignified or that scrupulous adherence to rigid, but nebulous, Bar rules somehow protect the public must give way to constitutional freedoms. Attorneys should push to extend freedoms, not be stifled in our own exercise of the rights we are sworn to protect.

Daniel Aaronson, chairman emeritus and immediate past president of the First Amendment Lawyers Association, Fort Lauderdale

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    School choice improves education system

    Earlier this month, Florida released school grades. The results showed that education reform and school choice is working. At Charter Schools USA (CSUSA), our high-performing schools continued to outpace the state and our newer schools showed improvements.

  • If Joy-Ann Reid were honest, she would tell folks that the ACA was written by Democrats specifically to prevent people who enroll in the federal exchange from receiving subsidies, as subsidies would be available only in the state run exchanges. The Democrats thought the lure of free money would encourage the states to set up their own exchanges. This was no drafting error, as plainly seen by the wording of the act, which in several sections clearly stated that subsidies would be for state exchanges only. Democrats wrote and passed this bill, apparently without reading it.

  • Dooley better candidate

    As an active supporter of Rachel Glorioso Dooley in her Miami-Dade County Court candidacy, I was disappointed in the reasoning given by the Herald for its recommendation of Judge Jacqueline Schwartz which was simply that she is the incumbent.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category