Changes on the way in how military handles sexual assault


McClatchy Washington Bureau

Get ready for some unforeseen consequences as Congress changes how the military handles sexual assault.

Alleged victims will get their own lawyers. That could protect their rights, or it could double-team the defense. Preliminary hearings will be constrained. That could shield victims, or it could shackle fact-finding. Military commanders who don’t prosecute allegations will get second-guessed by superiors. For any career-minded officer, that could be hard to ignore.

All told, Congress has ordered some 30 changes in how the military handles sexual assault. On Friday, President Barack Obama reiterated his own intentions to crack down.

“We pursued reforms that would encourage survivors to report these assaults, lead to more prosecutions, and put these perpetrators behind bars,” Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said Friday.

The myriad military sexual assault provisions are included in a $625 billion, 1,105-page defense authorization bill passed by the Senate late Thursday night and now heading for Obama’s signature. The goals seem laudatory and clear. The real-world consequences, though, could take time to sort out.

“Why don’t they have the integrity to simply state their true intentions – that they want to change the system to conform with a presumption of guilt and to make it much easier to prosecute and convict, and get harsh sentences and no clemency?” military defense attorney Richard Stevens said Friday.

Lawmakers wrote the defense bill in the wake of high-profile sexual assault cases, including an Air Force general who overturned the conviction of a fellow fighter pilot. More broadly, members of the military reported 3,553 sexual assault allegations between October 2012 and June 2013, according to the Pentagon. Many more incidents go unreported.

“Our military justice system should encourage sexual assault victims to report these crimes and pursue justice by prosecuting perpetrators,” said Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. “Tragically, the (current) process does just the opposite.”

Obama added Friday that “we have an urgent obligation to do more to support victims and hold perpetrators accountable for their crimes,” and he directed Pentagon officials to report back next December on their progress.

“Survivors of these heinous crimes expect and deserve us to act now,” Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., said Friday.

In some cases, the revisions may play out in unexpected ways.

For alleged victims, the bill requires that a new “special victim’s counsel” be provided to offer legal “consultation and assistance.” This could reassure the alleged victim through the investigation and trial. It could also prompt litigation amid questions about the special counsel’s powers and a potential tilting of the playing field.

“Allowing a (special victim’s counsel) to represent and assert the rights of an alleged victim at court-martial would effectively double the prosecutorial efforts against the accused,” Marine Corps Capt. Jason R. Wareham warned in a legal brief earlier this year.

Courtroom challenges to an existing Air Force victim’s counsel program already have begun. In January, a trial judge at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico ruled that letting the special victim’s counsel address the court-martial proceedings would undermine the appearance of an impartial judiciary. In July, a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces overturned the trial judge.

“There are many examples of civilian federal court decisions allowing victims to be represented by counsel at pretrial hearings,” the military appellate court stated in its 3-2 ruling.

Other legislative changes address issues that seem notorious, but are relatively infrequent.

The defense bill, for instance, strips military commanders of their ability to overturn convictions. This responds to the outcry that ensued when Air Force Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin on Feb. 26 overturned the sexual assault conviction of Air Force Lt. Col. James Wilkerson. Franklin explained in a memo that “the more evidence that I considered, the more concerned I became about the court-martial findings.” Franklin’s staff judge advocate had recommended upholding the conviction.

It’s already rare for commanders to overturn convictions.

Air Force commanders overturned 40 convictions, five of them involving sexual assault, out of 3,713 convictions in the last five years, according to the Pentagon. In the Navy and Marine Corps between 2010 and 2012, only eight convictions were overturned by commanders out of 2,489 convictions on all charges. Army commanders overturned 68 convictions out of 4,603 cases with convictions since 2008.

The defense bill also includes language promoted by Boxer and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina to tighten so-called Article 32 preliminary hearings. These are akin to civilian grand jury proceedings, but they came into political disfavor this year after defense attorneys aggressively questioned over several days an alleged sexual assault victim from the U.S. Naval Academy.

The bill prohibits an alleged victim from being compelled to testify at the Article 32 hearing and limits the type of questions that can be asked, among other changes. The revisions have won praise from some experts like Eugene Fidell at Yale Law School, while others question their impact.

“Congress certainly painted with some broad strokes,” Zachary Spilman, a Marine Corps judge advocate, said Friday. “Gone is the requirement for ‘a thorough and impartial investigation’ (and) the guarantee to an accused of the opportunity ‘to present anything he may desire in his own behalf.’”

At the same time, Spilman – stressing that he was speaking only for himself – predicted that there remains “plenty of room for a clever defense counsel to protect the rights of an accused.”

Commanding officers who decline to prosecute a sexual assault case will now get their decisions reviewed either by the “next superior commander” or by the service secretary – a civilian political appointee – depending on the circumstances, under the bill. Some believe this will improve accountability; some fear it puts a thumb on the scale.

“What I don’t think we want is a commander saying, ‘My career depends on whether I prosecute this case,’” military defense attorney William E. Cassara said Friday.

Email:; Twitter: @MichaelDoyle10

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

FILE - This March 14, 2013 file photo shows House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., and House Democratic leaders speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. The House Republicans’ campaign committee raised almost $10 million in March and has $31.2 million banked to defend the party’s majority, according to financial reports filed Sunday. The National Republican Congressional Committee’s $21.2 million fundraising haul in January, February and March gave the group its best first-quarter showing since 2003. It also puts the committee roughly $8 million ahead of its fundraising at this point in 2012. From left to right are Democratic Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel, D-N.Y., House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Democratic Caucus Chairman Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.

    GOP campaign committee has $31M to hold House

    The House Republican campaign committee raised almost $10 million in March and has $31.2 million banked to defend the party's majority, according to financial reports filed Sunday.

First lady Michelle Obama, left, walks with President Barack Obama, and daughters Sasha and Malia, both partially obscured, from the White House to a motorcade to attend Easter services on Sunday, April 20, 2014, in Washington. The first family attended services at the Nineteenth Street Baptist Church in Washington.

    Obama, family cause a small stir at Easter service

    President Barack Obama may have expected a quiet Easter, but his presence rallied a congregation eager to greet him and his family to the front of the church.

Retire U.S. Army Col. Conrad Reynolds participates in a debate between Republican Congressional hopefuls in Little Rock, Ark., Saturday, April 19, 2014. Three area seeking the GOP nomination in the race for Congress in Arkansas' 2nd district.

    3 vying for Republican nomination for House seat

    The three candidates seeking the Republican nomination for a central Arkansas congressional seat are running on vows to cut taxes and regulations in Washington, but split sharply on who would be the strongest candidate in this fall's election.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category