In My Opinion



What’s most worrisome about Latin America’s disastrous performance in the recently released international PISA student tests are not the results themselves, but that many countries in the region are not even recognizing that they have a serious problem.

Since the results of the test came out earlier this month, there has been a lot of media attention to the fact that Latin American countries that participated in the test — Chile, Mexico, Uruguay, Costa Rica, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Peru — ranked at the bottom of the list of 65 participating countries.

But little or nothing has been written about the countries that pulled out from the test at the last minute, like Panama, or those that chose not to participate at all — perhaps fearing that they would fare even worse than those that did — such as Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Dominican Republic.

The PISA test is taken every three years among 15-year-old students, and measures their abilities in math, science and reading comprehension. It is by far the most respected international student test, education experts say.

This year, as in previous years, China and other Asian students got the best scores in all three categories.

In math, China’s city of Shanghai ranked No. 1, followed by Singapore, Hong Kong, Taipei, South Korea, Macao and Japan.

Further down the list are Switzerland (9), Finland (12), Germany (16), France (25), Spain (33), Russia (34), United States (36), Sweden (38), Chile (51), Mexico (53), Uruguay (55), Costa Rica (56), Brazil (58), Argentina (59), Colombia (62), and Peru (65). In reading comprehension and science, the results were similar.

In most European countries and the United States, the governments took responsibility for their relatively bad results, and interpreted them as a call to action to improve education standards. To their credit, some Latin American governments such as Mexico, Brazil , Colombia and Peru did the same.

But other Latin American governments tried to downplay the importance of the PISA results, or sought to discredit the test itself.

Argentina’s education minister Alberto Sileoni, who in previous years had blamed the PISA tests’ methodology for his country’s plummeting test scores, this time admitted that the results were bad news that need to be addressed.

But instead of using the PISA results to press for a nationwide campaign to reverse Argentina’s deteriorating education standards, he couched his remarks by stating that all Latin American countries did bad, and went out of his way to praise President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s education policies.

By far the most stupid reaction came from Bolivia, whose education Minister Roberto Aguilar was quoted by Bolivian media as saying that his country abstained from participating in the international test because it is a “neo-liberal (pro-free market) imposition.” An earlier article published in Bolivia’s education ministry’s Web page quotes Aguilar as stating that “the government of Bolivia will not allow the PISA test” to influence the country’s education system, and that Bolivia “will build its own evaluation systems and model.”

Cuba, which claims to have high education standards, did not say why it didn’t participate in the test. Neither did Venezuela. Critics say it’s because both countries fear results that could disprove their official propaganda claims.

Other self-proclaimed socialist countries, such as China and Vietnam, not only participate in the PISA test, but use it as a key driver of their education policies.

In addition to the test scores, the PISA tests also included a survey that asked students whether they are happy with their schools. Interestingly, Peruvian students — who ranked last in the test results — ranked third in the world in happiness with their schools, followed not too far behind by Colombians (5), Mexicans (7), Costa Ricans (8) and Uruguayans (13).

My opinion: While Latin American countries that participated in the PISA test are being harshly criticized in the media for their poor results, they should be commended for taking part in the exam.

If you have a serious problem, the best thing you can do is identifying it, quantifying it, and acting on it. The region’s educational divide is not between the countries that performed best and worse, but between those that participated and those that didn’t.

Fortunately, some non-participating countries, including Ecuador, Guatemala and Panama, are said to be considering taking the test in 2015.

But those that are not, such as Bolivia, Cuba, Venezuela and most Central American countries, are hiding behind ideological slogans or phony excuses to hide their educational debacle. They deserve the biggest criticism.

Read more Andres Oppenheimer stories from the Miami Herald

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: Obama should go to summit - and challenge Cuba

    President Barack Obama’s biggest upcoming diplomatic challenge in Latin America will be whether to attend the 34-country Summit of the Americas alongside Cuban leader Raúl Castro, who has been invited by the host country — Panama — over U.S. objections. I think Obama should go, and do something really bold there.

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: Bolivia’s election result is hardly in question

    Bolivia’s populist president, Evo Morales, has said he wants to win a third term in office with a whopping 74 percent of the vote in the Oct. 12 elections, and, judging from what his leading contender told me in an interview, it wouldn’t be surprising if Morales gets his wish.

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: Obama’s plan to counter Venezuela’s oil clout

    For years, U.S. officials have been in a quandary about how to counter Venezuela’s political influence in Central American and the Caribbean through its subsidized oil exports. Now, the Obama administration is quietly launching a plan that it hopes will help counter its importance.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category