The readers’ forum

Increase penalty for texting while driving

 

Our first texting-while-driving ban isn’t strong enough to be successful. This ban, which went into effect on Oct. 1 hinders local police officers from enforcing it efficiently.

The main reasons it is ineffective are because of exceptions included in the law and the fact that it is a secondary offense.

The texting-while-driving ban contains unnecessary exceptions. Drivers can text while stopped at a red light or in a traffic jam. Also, the violation is a secondary offense, which means that a police officer cannot pull the violator over unless another traffic violation is committed at the same time.

This makes it difficult for local law enforcers to implement the texting ban.

In addition, it is hard to prove that people are texting while driving, because such people could be changing the radio, picking up an object that fell on the car’s floor or looking at the GPS system recently included in the iPhone’s software.

As a driver, I can see the point of view of those who text while driving. If I were one of those law offenders, I would be less likely to text while driving if I knew it was a primary offense with a $150 fine.

Even better would be making the use of all wireless communication devices while driving illegal, with the exceptions for those in emergency and law-enforcement vehicles.

The state Legislature can impose a law prohibiting the use of all wireless communication devices while driving, thereby reducing the number of deaths and injuries caused by accidents involving texting.

Every day people, especially teenagers, have car accidents because of distracted driving. The Oct. 3 article, Texting and driving ban not tough enough, points out the gaps that make this law weak and ineffective. It states that 11 percent of fatal crashes where the driver was under 20 were caused by distracted driving and one in five of the teen drivers involved in a fatal accident was talking or texting.

We can dramatically reduce these numbers through the legislative process. Now is the time for change.

Yoel Morales, Pembroke Pines

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    Miami Dade College has critical unmet financial needs

    The recent exchange of words between the president of Miami Dade College and some members of the Miami-Dade legislative delegation was unfortunate, but it has focused our community’s attention on the critical unmet financial needs of MDC. I’m confident that our legislative leaders will rise above the fray and do what is right for our community.

  • Go Heat, but . . .

    Your April 17 story The Heat Unites Us was very optimistic, and that is admirable and to be expected for journalists at a local newspaper like Miami Herald.

  • Restore libraries

    There’s an important perspective to be added to the April 11 article Without more tax dollars, Miami-Dade library system would fire more than half its full-time staff.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category