Nanny scandal tearing U.S. and India apart


It hasn’t made too much noise here but there’s a major diplomatic rift developing between the United States and India over the arrest of an Indian diplomat in New York for underpaying her nanny. Senior government officials have refused to meet a visiting U.S. congressional delegation and security barriers have been removed from outside the U.S. embassy in New Delhi. The government is also reviewing the diplomatic immunity of U.S. officials in the country.

This all started last week when Devyani Khobragade, Political, Economic, Commercial, and Women’s Affairs at the Indian Consulate in New York, was arrested for visa fraud. Khobragade had stated on the visa application for her nanny, an Indian national named Sangeeta Richard, that the she would be paid $4,500 per month. But Khobragade allegedly later made Richard signs a second contract reducing her salary to $537 per month or less than $4 per hour. If convicted, Khobragade faces “a maximum sentence of 10 years.”

According to Indian media accounts, Khobragade was handcuffed on the street while dropping her daughters off at school and strip-searched before being released on bail. The U.S. State Department maintains that proper procedures were followed and that she was not covered under diplomatic immunity because the crimes were not committed in relation to her job. Under some circumstances, consular officials, as opposed to embassy officials can be arrested for felonies.

However, India is pointing to an article in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which states that if such charges are filed against a consular official, they “shall be conducted with the respect due to him by reason of his official position and, except when he is under arrest or detention, in a manner which will hamper the exercise of consular functions as little as possible.”

This isn’t the first case of this type involving Indian officials in New York. As Gwynn Guilford points out, “in 2012, a New York judge directed an Indian diplomat to pay her former domestic worker $1.5 million in damages due to “barbaric treatment” In 2011, India’s consul general in New York was charged with forced labor of his domestic helper.” Beyond India, the U.S. government has identified dozens of cases of abuse of domestic workers by foreign diplomats, often shielded from prosecution by immunity.

On the other side, India sees this as the latest in a pattern of their diplomats being disrespected in the U.S. As the Guardian recounts, “In 2010 there was uproar after India’s U.N. envoy, Hardeep Puri, was reportedly asked to remove his turban at a U.S. airport and detained in a holding room when he was refused. A hands-on search of India’s U.S. ambassador Meera Shankar at an airport in Mississippi that year also prompted claims that India had been ‘insulted.’ 

There’s obviously some election year politics going on with both the ruling congress party and insurgent BJP eager to show their willingness to take on the U.S. Leaders of both parties have declined to meet with the visiting U.S. delegation.

It seems obvious that U.S. officials probably could have handled this case better given the political stakes involved, but considering the recent calls in India for legislation to protect domestic workers from abuse and exploitation, it’s striking how quickly the Indian media coverage of this incident seems to have concluded that it was the accuser rather than the diplomat who is at fault here.

Joshua Keating is a staff writer at Slate focusing on international news, social science and related topics. He was previously an editor at Foreign Policy magazine.

© 2013, Slate.

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • Rick Perry’s comeback headed off at the pass

    It was all going so well for Texas Gov. Rick Perry — until the indictment. His efforts to move past a disastrous 2012 presidential run that had become a reliable punch line for a senior moment seemed to be working.

  • Why the Islamic State (or ISIS, or QSIS, or ISIL) has so many names

    The Guardian reports that an influential Egyptian group has requested that Western observers make a crucial nomenclature change. Egypt’s Dar al-Ifta, which the Guardian describes as “a wing of the Egyptian justice ministry … [and] a source of religious authority both inside and outside Egypt,” says that it’s not appropriate to refer to the self-proclaimed “Islamic State” that’s currently fighting in Iraq and Syria. Instead, according to Dar al-Ifta, we should call them “al-Qaida Separatists in Iraq and Syria,” or alternately QSIS. You can learn more by following the group’s “Call it QS not IS” social-media campaign.

  • Why do some hostages die and others are released?

    This last week’s deeply contrasting stories of two New Englanders caught in the Middle East’s maelstrom of violence — the savage murder of James Foley and the joyous release from captivity of Peter Theo Curtis — point to a central question: Why do some hostages die while others are released?

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category