Stop misusing hashtags


The Washington Post

While walking recently in Washington to the Woodley Park mass-transit station, I spotted a bright red sign for District of Columbia mayoral candidate Jack Evans on a light pole. Under the candidate’s name, the poster said simply: “#schools.” To which I responded: #facepalm.

Evans, or more likely his campaign staff, has also created signs proclaiming “#jobs” and “#safestreets,” presumably to catch the eyes of young voters savvy to social media. If the messages succeed, however, I’m guessing it will be for the wrong reason — because they demonstrate no understanding of how hashtags actually work.

I don’t mean to pick on Evans. His signs are part of a far more pervasive trend. (Do they even make candidate podiums without hashtags on them anymore?) Modern marketing’s use of hashtags has reached a point of desperation. According to, half of the commercials that aired during the 2013 Super Bowl contained a hashtag. The conventional wisdom seems to be that anything can be improved by slapping a hashtag on it. Somewhere, Don Draper is shaking his head in dismay.

Use of the hashtag was conceived in 2007 as a way to add context to tweets on Twitter. Two years later, they were made searchable, allowing Twitter users to track which tags were trending. Hashtags have since migrated to other social-media platforms, most notably when Facebook caved to demand and started hyperlinking hashtags in June.

Hashtags are most effective when used organically. They can add snark, sarcasm or a punch line to a 140-character message. They can also link users who are posting about the same event, whether something as big as a presidential debate or as intimate as a friend’s wedding. And, in the right circumstances, they can demonstrate that an organization, business or public figure has a grasp on the latest memes or trends.

Misuse of hashtags is glaring to the informed user. Simply plastering “#schools” on a poster will get you nothing, because even if someone takes the time to type that into a phone or computer (after all, hashtags belong on screens, not in print), they will find pretty much zip about Evans. The criterion is too broad.

Alas, however, when companies or candidates use hashtags for the sake of using hashtags, the results are, at best, ineffective. At worst, they can backfire embarrassingly.

This month, JPMorgan Chase scrapped an attempt to engage Twitter users with the hashtag “#askJPM” after sarcastic and off-topic responses poured in. This brings to mind similar #fails by McDonald’s and BlackBerry, in which poorly conceived marketing strategies quickly inspired users across the Internet to lampoon their products and services.

Candidates, businesses and advertising firms that wish to boost their online presence or that of their clients can do two things to improve their approaches to social media.

The first is to hire millennials, who can offer a natural understanding of social media and more adeptly analyze whether a slogan or attempt at humor will stand out in a feed. To truly understand the hyper-paced Twitter landscape requires one to be constantly plugged in to it. Because many younger workers already use social media heavily, they are valuable resources to organizations hoping to negotiate the torrent of tweets, retweets and mentions.

The second is to stop trying to force hashtags on people, a tactic that almost always fails. Social media were created to foster interaction, and that’s how they work best. Instead, candidates and companies should have their social-media teams find positive mentions of them and use that to their advantage. Why create content when it already exists? Retweeting a positive comment by a voter, or a good review by a customer, can establish a more organic, human and legitimate online reputation. Responding to negative input can show an admirable commitment to accountability and customer service and a willingness to address issues on a personal level.

In an age of viral content, a single instance of success or failure can have swift and resounding impact. Fortunately, political figures and businesses can turn to younger workers to guide them through the storm.

Special to The Washington Post

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • Why Obama shouldn’t go to Ferguson

    On Monday, ABC’s Ann Compton asked President Barack Obama whether he would visit Ferguson, Missouri, amid the continued unrest. Obama didn’t give a firm answer, but he did suggest it’s probably not a good idea.

  • I’m a cop. If you don’t want to get hurt, don’t challenge me.

    A teen-ager is fatally shot by a police officer; the police are accused of being bloodthirsty, trigger-happy murderers; riots erupt. This, we are led to believe, is the way of things in America.

  • We’re spending too much on raising kids

    The Department of Agriculture has released its annual report on the cost of raising children, and the upshot is what you probably already know: It’s expensive.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category