CHILE

Chile’s Bachelet must balance growth and spending

 
 
Government expenditures are likely to rise under Chile's newly elected president, Michelle Bachelet.
Government expenditures are likely to rise under Chile's newly elected president, Michelle Bachelet.
AP

Elblogdemontaner.com

Michelle Bachelet will soon return to Chile’s government house. Chileans like her, and she probably deserves to return. She went through La Moneda once and left it with a very high approval rate.

However, this time she has been voted in so she can govern differently, and she has so promised. Healthcare and education will be gratis. She’s going to lay the foundations for a welfare state. Public expenditure will increase substantially, of course, and with it the merry legion of functionaries.

No doubt about it. There is discontent with the Chilean model, despite its huge successes and the undeniable fact that it is the leading economy in Latin America today. Why? According to Mauricio Rojas, “We’re looking at a long process that had a spectacular hatching in 2011, with major social upheavals that installed an anti-system discourse that questioned the pillars of the Chilean model.”

Later, he says: “The Chilean center-right thought that the system’s efficiency would automatically grant it legitimacy and support, and ignored the area where the course of societies is decided — the field of ideas.” He wrote this with much concern in an article titled Chile, Headed for the Welfare State and Chavist Democracy.

Mauricio Rojas knows whereof he speaks. In his youth, he was a fiery Marxist, a member of the MIR [Revolutionary Left Movement], and fled into exile after Augusto Pinochet’s coup to avoid being killed. He moved to Sweden. Happily, he regained sanity there. He got a doctorate in economics at Lund University and abandoned his foolish Marxist superstitions. Later he understood the errors and excesses of the welfare state. He became a Liberal Party deputy and lived intensely the rectification of the excesses committed by the Social Democrats, especially after the crisis of the 1990s.

Sweden was one of the world’s most habitable countries, but its excessive public expenditure — which reached 67 percent of GNP — and state meddling ended up throttling the initiative of civil society and ruining the nation’s finances.

After the debacle, the successive Swedish governments, in addition to cutting spending, learned to depend more on the private sector and turned to the market through systems of vouchers that gave back to society its power (and right) to choose. The public and private sectors harmonized.

The discussion, then, should not be over whether or not it’s convenient to build a welfare state. The core issue is different: Does society produce enough wealth to sustain a model of existence where people have comfortable homes, varied meals, adequate clothing, quality education and sanitation, transportation, communications, entertainment and efficient infrastructures? All that is very nice but also very costly.

The Scandinavian nations are not at the top of world comfort because they decided to create welfare states, but because they generated a productive fabric in the private sector that allowed them to segregate societies like the ones we see in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland.

Switzerland is Switzerland and Austria is Austria not because the kindly politicians and functionaries in those countries decided to give those societies a high standard of living and distribute the wealth, but because each country has a highly competitive private-enterprise apparatus that creates well-paid jobs and pays taxes. There is no question here of who comes first, the chicken or the egg.

That’s Chile’s pending task. The country is doing well, yes, but not as well as others, and only thanks to its exports of copper, salmon, wine, vegetables and a few other products.

As Harvard professor Ricardo Hausmann says: “The only new things that Chile has developed are the AFPs [Pension Fund Administrators], the wonderful private retirement system created by economist José Piñera, and the Falabella and Cencosud department stores and supermarkets. The country has surprisingly few world-competitive businesses, and that shows a lack of diversification that should cause concern.”

The governments that Chile and all other countries need are not those that primarily aim to distribute wealth but those that decide to foster the creation of vigorous, competitive and diversified private enterprises that nourish and sustain the emergence of educated middle classes and, in so doing, fund an efficient state.

How is that done? Let’s hope that Bachelet finds out before she causes a disaster.

Read more Carlos Alberto Montaner stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">SPANISH ROYALS</span>: Prince Felipe, slated to become Spain’s new monarch, talks with Princess Letizia during a ceremony in northern Spain last week.

    SPAIN

    Spain’s monarchy faces challenges as new era dawns

    Francisco Franco died in 1975 thinking that the future of Spain was wrapped up “good and tidy.” I’ve never believed the theory that the caudillo prepared a post-mortem transition to democracy.

  •  
Centrist candidate Mauricio Rodas greets supporters after trouncing the government’s official candidate for mayor of Quito, Ecuador, in last month’s elections.

    ECUADOR

    Eduardo Correa losing popularity in Ecuador

    It happened again. The defeat of Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa in the municipal elections of Feb. 23 is not an isolated case. It is possible that 21st-century socialism, its ideological neighbors and the circuit of countries in the “Bolivarian” circle, known by acronym ALBA, are in a downturn.

  •  
MCT

    U.S./CUBA

    The Doberman in Havana and the White House

    President Obama wants to modify U.S. policy toward Cuba. It is not an important priority, so he won’t put too much effort into it, but he will try to do something if he doesn't find too much resistance on the way.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category