The readers’ forum

Landmark legislation passes without Rubio

 

The U.S. Senate recently made history voting 64-32 to pass landmark legislation extending workplace protections to the LGBT community. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) would make it illegal under federal law for employers to discriminate against their employees based on the employee’s sexual orientation or gender identity. These same basic workplace protections are already afforded to individuals on the basis of race, creed, national origin, gender, and disability status.

The vote saw 54 Democratic members of the Senate joined by 10 Senate Republicans in supporting what many have characterized as not only “the right thing to do,” but also as “common-sense legislation.” Those Republicans voting in favor of ENDA included Senators McCain and Flake of Arizona, Collins of Maine, Portman of Ohio, Toomey of Pennsylvania, Hatch of Utah, Ayotte of New Hampshire, Murkowski of Alaska, Kirk of Illinois, and Heller of Nevada. Notably missing from that list is the junior senator from Florida, Marco Rubio.

As an openly gay American and a third-year law student at the same university from which Sen. Rubio earned his law degree, I am highly disappointed in the senator’s poor judgment. By voting against the measure, he has demonstrated his belief that it is simply OK for individuals to lose their jobs because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

That is simply not OK..

Employment decisions should not take into account one’s sexual orientation or gender identity; just as such decisions should not be based on other arbitrary characteristics such as one’s race or gender. Rather, individuals should be evaluated for their experience, their dedication, their talents, and their abilities.

Unlike Sen. Rubio I have not yet earned my law degree from the University of Miami, nor have I served as Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, nor am I a United States senator, but I do know enough to know that allowing LGBT individuals to be discriminated against in the workplace is not good public policy.

Bigotry and prejudice serve no purpose in the workplace, and Sen. Rubio serves no purpose in the U.S. Senate.

Brendan G. Corrigan, Miami

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    Parking shortage in Wynwood must be addressed

    In reference to the article Wynwood entrepreneurs at odds with Miami Parking Authority over district’s future:

  • The readers’ forum

    We need more young women in politics

    As Florida women cast their ballots to decide the outcome of the primary elections in Tuesday’s primary, the League of Women Voters celebrates the anniversary of women getting the right to vote.

  • A president for all

    Re Joy-Ann Reid’s column on Aug. 21, Why some fear the police:

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category