Iran and nukes: Is any deal good enough?



As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sees it, almost any deal between Iran and the West to limit Tehran’s nuclear program would be a bad deal.

Before anything was finalized in Friday’s nuclear talks in Geneva, the Israeli leader was already warning that a rumored accord was a “grievous historical error.” He said Israel “utterly” rejected the accord, which would freeze much of Iran’s nuclear program for several months in return for limited relief from international sanctions, while further talks sought permanent, verifiable curbs.

Netanyahu was jumping the gun, since there is no agreement yet.

But to the Israeli leader, the only deal that makes sense is one that totally ends Iran’s nuclear program — full stop. He distrusts the dramatic overtures to the West made by the new Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, and he calls for more draconian sanctions to be imposed on Tehran. His position has strong, bipartisan support in Congress, where new sanctions are under debate.

Before they rev up the pressure, U.S. legislators ought to consider whether an all-or-nothing stance toward Tehran will hurt U.S. and Israeli interests more than it helps.

After years of threats from Tehran and its Hezbollah ally, Israel wants to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, including a ban on any uranium enrichment, even for energy or research. But can such a maximalist deal be reached at the negotiating table? That is the question that must be honestly addressed.

“Not achievable,” said Robert Einhorn, until recently a top State Department adviser on arms control. “I don’t think any Iranian government could sell that deal at home,” he added during a conference call hosted by the Israel Project, a nonprofit that promotes Israeli security.

While Rouhani and his team are willing to limit enrichment, they won’t end it entirely. Einhorn believes that harsher sanctions would not budge them on this point, despite Rouhani’s urgent desire to ease the burden of sanctions on Iran’s economy. In conversations with numerous Iran experts, I’ve found widespread agreement with that view.

Instead, harsher sanctions at this point could halt diplomacy. Rather than curbing Iran’s nuclear program, a breakdown in talks might well encourage Tehran to accelerate it, which has happened every time talks broke down in the past.

Moreover, Washington (and Israel) would likely be blamed for the diplomatic breakdown, with dangerous consequences. “I think we would pay a price in terms of the unraveling of sanctions,” said Einhorn, “if it looked like we, and not the Iranians, were the cause of the impasse.” In other words, harsher sanctions could boomerang.

In a fascinating speech to a top Israeli think tank in October, Einhorn suggested an alternative way of looking at negotiations. Titled Is a ‘Good’ Deal Possible? and available on the Brookings Institution’s website, the speech should be required reading for members of Congress eager to tighten the sanctions screws.

The test of any nuclear deal, Einhorn suggests, should not be how it measures up to the ideal outcome, but how it compares with alternative means for dealing with the problem. If one accepts that sanctions can’t end Iran’s nuclear program, and one rules out diplomacy, there are only two other options: regime change in Tehran or war.

The American experience in Iraq should have ended any fantasies of imposing regime change on Tehran. As for a military strike on its nuclear facilities, the risks are substantial and the downsides enormous. For starters, a military attack would probably prompt Tehran to expel U.N. weapons inspectors and go full speed toward producing a bomb.

Do Iran hawks in Congress really have the stomach for another Mideast military expedition — especially when there is a chance of a diplomatic deal that would severely curb Iran’s nuclear program and keep it under control?

Which brings us back to Einhorn’s basic point: The perfect deal is unobtainable. So can an agreement that falls short of ideal still be a “good” deal, one that is preferable to other options, even if it allows Iran to retain a limited enrichment program?

That depends, of course, on the details. Any deal would ultimately have to cap Iran’s centrifuge program and enrichment output, and prevent the start-up of the Arak heavy-water reactor. It would have to extend the breakout time — the point at which, should Iran ever kick out inspectors, it would have the fissile material for a bomb.

And any deal would require constant and intrusive inspections. It would also have to require Iran to come clean to U.N. inspectors about its past weapons programs.

This is a tall order. But, with Rouhani’s election, a window of opportunity exists, and it would be foolish to waste it. The doubters in Congress should carefully consider the alternatives. And they shouldn’t make the perfect the enemy of the good.

©2013 The Philadelphia Inquirer

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

Tony Lesesne


    Tony Lesesne: Overkill, and an apology

    Yes, it happens in South Florida, too — and it shouldn’t. Black men pulled over, needlessly hassled by police officers who give the rest of their colleagues a bad name, who make no distinction when a suspect has no other description than ‘black male,’ who harass residents because they can. A North Miami Beach officer pulls over a black man in a suit and tie — and behind the wheel of an Audi that simply had to be stolen, right? In another Miami-Dade city, an officer demands that an African-American man installing a vegetable garden justify why he has a shovel and seedlings. Detained for possession of cilantro? Here are five South Floridians who tell of their experiences in this community and beyond, years ago, and all too recently.

Delrish Moss


    Delrish Moss: Out after dark

    “I was walking up Seventh Avenue, just shy of 14th street. I was about 17 and going home from my job. I worked at Biscayne Federal Bank after school. The bank had a kitchen, and I washed the dishes. A police officer gets out of his car. He didn’t say anything. He came up and pushed me against a wall, frisked me, then asked what I was doing walking over here after dark. Then he got into his car and left. I never got a chance to respond. I remember standing there feeling like my dignity had been taken with no explanation. I would have felt better about that incident had I gotten some sort of dialogue. I had not had any encounters with police.


    Bill Diggs: Hurt officer’s feelings

    “I’m the first generation in my family to go to college, and if I wanted to do nothing else, I wanted to make my mom happy. I was living for my parents, I wanted to be that guy, I wanted to go to work and not have to put on steel-toe boots. And here I am in Atlanta, I have finally grown to a particular level of affluence. I wasn’t making a lot of money, but I was a college kid, wearing a suit, driving a nice BMW going to work everyday. Can’t beat that. I would leave my house, drive up Highway 78, the Stone Mountain area, grab some coffee, go to work. So on this particular morning, there’s a cop who’s rustling up this homeless guy outside the gas station where I was filling up. I’m shaking my head, the cop looks at me. This homeless guy is there every morning. I get in my car and on to the expressway. The police officer comes shooting up behind me. I doing 65, 70. He gets up behind me, I notice he’s following me. I get in one lane, he gets in the lane, I get in another lane, he gets in that lane. He finally flips his lights on, he comes up to the car. I’ve been pulled over for speeding before, I know the drill. Got my hands up here, don’t want to get shot, and I think he’s going to say what I’ve heard before: ‘License and registration, please.’ He says ‘Get out of the car!’ and he reaches in and grabs me by my shirt. He says, ‘So you’re a smart ass, huh?’ Finally he says, ‘License and registration.’ I tell him it’s in the car. He says, ‘Get it for me!’ He goes back to his car, comes back and asks, ‘So where did you get the car from?’ I say ‘It’s a friend of mine’s.” He says, ‘Is it stolen? What are you doing driving your friend’s car?’ I finally asked, ‘Is there a reason you stopped me? You followed me, what’s up, man?’ He says, ‘I’m going to let you go with a warning, but if you see me doing what I’ve got to do for my job, don’t you ever f---ing worry about it.”

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category