A view from the right, the right way

 

The Philadelphia Inquirer

There’s a move among some of the adults remaining in the GOP to lead the party on a path that regains its footing. Take Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, who ran a campaign commercial touting his record of “compromise,” a dirty word in Washington. Or Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who, while running for reelection, has been speaking out against those who keep “voting scorecards” and who recently proclaimed on the stump, “I’m not in the shut-down-the-government crowd.” Even Ohio Gov. John Kasich recently voiced concern with what he sees as “a war on the poor.”

But the Republican leader who has offered the most comprehensive and cogent case for the party’s future is former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, who did so in a recent address to an LGBT group in Washington. (Read it at logcabin.org.)

Ridge told a Washington gathering of Log Cabin Republicans on Oct. 23 that he sees the GOP of the 21st century as “a nonjudgmental conservative party – a winning party,” and then (like Alexander), Ridge took aim at litmus tests.

“Two Republican presidents changed my life in a very personal and meaningful way,” Ridge said. “One called on me to serve my country in Vietnam. The other asked me to serve my country after the attacks of 9/11. Neither president asked me my position on social issues.”

Ridge applauded the way in which Ronald Reagan confronted liberals. (”See, he was respectful. He was civil. He was positive. He challenged; he didn’t condemn.”) And Ridge highlighted how a shrinking base has allowed the likes of Sens. Alexander, Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio, Orrin Hatch, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham to have their conservatism questioned.

“For many observers, the GOP has become intolerant, judgmental, and self-righteous – perhaps worthy of attitudes of the Pilgrims in 1620, but hardly attractive qualities for a political party nearly 400 years later,” Ridge said. “Sadly, there is very little room or respect for differences of opinion on social issues.”

Strong words from a man who has run eight campaigns as a Republican. But he’s uniquely qualified to offer that view. Remember, McCain favored Ridge or Joe Lieberman as his vice presidential pick in 2008, avoiding the former because he is pro-choice.

In setting forth his opposition to Obamacare, Ridge gave a tutorial on how to advocate while seeking to expand the tent. He described the law as flawed and worthy of repeal, “blatantly infringing on the religious liberties of Catholic and other religious healthcare facilities.” But, he added, in demanding respect for individual rights, Republicans must “respect the rights of others to live and let live.”

“If we want a government that acknowledges our God-given right to freely choose how we live – in regard to marriage and other issues – we must demand a government that respects the rights of others to choose and follow their conscience just the same,” he said.

Instead of George W. Bush’s compassionate conservatism, this was Tom Ridge’s conservative tolerance. And perhaps the paragraph with his keenest insight was this:

“In order to govern, we must win national elections. To do so, the narcissists and ideologues within our party need to understand that Americans are more conservative than liberal, but are more practical than ideological, and more tolerant and open-minded than judgmental. They are also looking for real, not rhetorical, solutions.”

Two days after Ridge said those words, I read them aloud to yet another Republican leader who seems out of step with the Ted Cruz-ification of the party, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman. The former ambassador to China said of Ridge:

“I know his heart and soul, and he’s probably one of the greatest public servants this country has produced in a long time. What he described in that paragraph, every American ought to read that, because that, I think, is a completely apt description of who we are, our heart and soul, what makes us unique as Americans and what, in short, is going to make the Republican Party successful if we ever want to win a national election again.”

Finally, Ridge, like Christie, dared use the C word, “compromise, in referencing “when our founders drafted the most significant political compromises of self-government known to mankind – the Constitution of the United States.”

A few days after the speech, I sought confirmation from Ridge that this was no ordinary speech. He obliged.

“When their leadership invited me to attend their fund-raiser, I said I’ll do this on one condition,” he told me. “I’m coming there not to talk to you as a gay and lesbian audience; I’m coming there to talk to you about the Republican Party. You are Republicans who happen to be gay and lesbian, but I want to talk about the bigger issue, and that’s the direction of the party and the kind of party that I think we need to build to win elections, national elections, in the 21st century. If you’re willing to accept that condition, then I’m going to sit down and write a speech specifically for that goal, and they accepted that condition, and I delivered the speech.”

He added: “I kind of got it off my chest, to be frank with you.”

All Americans should read the speech. It’ll have them Googling Ridge’s age – 68 – with an eye toward 2016, even though he is emphatic he had no such motivation in speaking his mind.

Michael Smerconish writes for The Philadelphia Inquirer.

©2013 The Philadelphia Inquirer

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • Elizabeth Warren’s needed call for student loan reform

    As commencement season approaches, graduating students will soon hear words of wisdom from speakers offering experience, advice and inspiration. One thing they’re not likely to hear about is the $1.08 trillion elephant on the quad — our nation’s student debt crisis.

  • Jenny McCarthy, vaccine agitator, does a pivot

    What do you call someone who sows misinformation, stokes fear, abets behavior that endangers people’s health, extracts enormous visibility from doing so and then says the equivalent of “Who? Me?”

  • It’s not Beijing’s hackers you should worry about, it’s Moscow’s

    When U.S. officials warn of the threat foreign cyber spies pose to American companies and government agencies, they usually focus on China, which has long been home to the world’s most relentless and aggressive hackers. But new information shows that Russian and Eastern European hackers, who have historically focused their energies on crime and fraud, now account for a large and growing percentage of all cyber espionage, most of which is directed at the United States.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category