Huge medical bills

 

While I will vote Yes for the Jackson Memorial bond issue, your Oct. 13 editorial, Yes to Jackson Health System, focuses on getting more paying patients into the hospital. As a paying patient, I cannot consult with any doctor on Jackson premises, as I not only must pay the doctor’s fee, but by seeing a specialist I have learned I will also be charged a hospital fee of as much as $500.

There is also the problem of Jackson not coordinating with the University of Miami as a provider. My late husband was treated by a UM pulmonologist who once referred him to the Jackson pulmonology clinic for tests. Jackson wasn’t a provider under our insurance; the university was, so we received a huge bill from Jackson. My husband moved his care to Mount Sinai to avoid any more of this kind of confusion.

The bottom line is that, if I can avoid Jackson, I do, not only because of the rundown facility and parking issues, but because of the excess charges imposed on paying patients.

S.M. Dunaj, Miami

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • Lure of free money

    If Joy-Ann Reid were honest, she would tell folks that the ACA was written by Democrats specifically to prevent people who enroll in the federal exchange from receiving subsidies, as subsidies would be available only in the state run exchanges. The Democrats thought the lure of free money would encourage the states to set up their own exchanges. This was no drafting error, as plainly seen by the wording of the act, which in several sections clearly stated that subsidies would be for state exchanges only. Democrats wrote and passed this bill, apparently without reading it.

  • The readers’ forum

    School choice improves education system

    Earlier this month, Florida released school grades. The results showed that education reform and school choice is working. At Charter Schools USA (CSUSA), our high-performing schools continued to outpace the state and our newer schools showed improvements.

  • Dooley better candidate

    As an active supporter of Rachel Glorioso Dooley in her Miami-Dade County Court candidacy, I was disappointed in the reasoning given by the Herald for its recommendation of Judge Jacqueline Schwartz which was simply that she is the incumbent.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category