Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

Smart growth, meet dumb move

 

OUR OPINION: Miami-Dade commissioners’ unwise approval of expanding urban boundary will cost taxpayers more

HeraldEd@MiamiHerald.com

There’s enough buildable land within Miami-Dade County’s Urban Development Boundary to satisfy projected growth needs until 2026, says county planning chief Mark Woerner. That projection is new — the initial date was 2021, but county planners, backed by state experts, say population growth will continue at lower rates through 2030.

That projection has a lot of ramifications for Miami-Dade, many could be negative. But not to the Miami-Dade Commission, which moved the UDB recently and refused to protect 3,600 more acres earmarked for development, jeopardizing the county water supply and land that would better serve the Everglades than local builders.

The commission approved a 521-acre parcel for development west of the Florida Turnpike and north of the Dolphin Expressway. The land is surrounded by commercial buildings — a so-called “doughnut hole” left out of the UDB when the commission approved the Beacon Lakes and Shoppyland Enterprises office and industrial projects in 2002. Using the fig leaf that the 521 acres are sitting in the middle of development already, the commission, in an 11-1 vote, made the tract available for more warehouses and office buildings. That’s not smart growth.

On the surface, this might seem to make sense. But it’s only reasonable because of earlier, often controversial, commission decisions pushing the boundary west against staff recommendations. Almost every time the commission expands the UDB it sets a new precedent for future “reasonable” moves west allowing development on “backfill” or adjacent land. The argument being “there’s development next door, so why not on my land, too?”

Incrementally, the commission is chipping away at land set aside in the comprehensive development master plan to preserve the county’s agricultural economy and to keep construction away from well fields and protect the Everglades.

Commissioners’ votes on other staff land-use recommendations mostly reflect a gung-ho westward expansion mindset. They rejected proposals to eliminate or reduce development on three tracts just outside the UDB in Southwest Miami-Dade, earmarked in 1983 as future expansion areas for growth. The county’s regulatory and economic resources agency says that the parcels are in a potential flood-zone or hurricane-evacuation area or are targeted for Everglades restoration projects or well-field protection. The master plan wisely says that such lands shouldn’t be developed.

But commissioners didn’t buy it. They almost agreed to protect more land around a drinking-water well field west of Krome Avenue, but couldn’t muster the votes. Only one proposal got the nod: the commission reduced possible development in an area west of 137th Avenue by 575 acres for its wetlands potential.

In expanding the UDB again (the last time was in 2011) and refusing to pull some parcels out of future development mode, commissioners unwisely ignored county planners’ reasoning that slowed population growth in Miami-Dade has reduced demand for new development. Even with more newcomers from, say, Latin America in the future, planners project net population growth will slow for nearly two decades.

Instead of ignoring the messenger, commissioners should seek ways to offset the negative economic effects that fewer new residents could trigger. Let’s focus on bringing more diverse industries and investments to Miami-Dade — not adopt a “if we build it, they will come” attitude.

Read more Editorials stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
Dade County Courthouse circa late 1920s or early 1930s.

    Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Crumbling courthouse an injustice

    OUR OPINION: Let Miami-Dade voters decide if they want to build a new one

  • Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Labor Day blues

    OUR OPINION: Workers fall behind even as economy expands

  •  
From left, former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and Gov. Rick Scott.

    Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    Nasty and expensive

    OUR OPINION: Gubernatorial candidates must address issues — even as they sling mud.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category