Deadly foot-dragging

 

The Washington Post

Five years after my son Cameron died in a car crash, Congress passed a law, named after my boy, to ensure that such a tragedy would never happen again. But five more years have passed, and the safety fix that Congress ordered completed by 2011 has been needlessly delayed. I’m suing the Obama administration to compel it to do what Congress directed.

One evening in 2002, as I backed my SUV into my driveway, I checked my rearview and side mirrors, but there was something they could not show me: Cameron had followed me outside and was standing, in his pajamas, directly behind my vehicle.

I ran over my son.

I thought my tragedy was a freak accident. But I soon learned that each week dozens of toddlers in the United States are struck by drivers backing up.

Rearview and side mirrors show a lot, but there is a large area directly behind every vehicle that can’t be seen by drivers.

Auto manufacturers have engineered a fix: the rear-view camera. But most cars don’t have them.

After learning of the deaths of children such as Cameron, my representative in Congress, Peter King, R-N.Y., worked with Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., to propose legislation requiring new vehicles to ensure rear visibility through cameras or other methods. Earlier lifesaving innovations that society now takes for granted, such as seat belts and air bags, were once an optional luxury before the federal government required them in every vehicle.

The bill passed the House easily and the Senate unanimously; President George W. Bush signed it into law in February 2008.

I thought the safety improvements would start then, but, like most laws, the legislation did not set specific requirements. It ordered the Transportation Department to issue, within three years, the regulation that would set the exact standards and give them legal force. The law allowed the department to seek an extension if that deadline “cannot be met.”

Five agonizing years later, amid claims of unjustified costs, the rule has not been issued. Each year more than 200 individuals are killed and 18,000 injured, according to Transportation Department estimates. In November 2011, the agency sent its final draft of the rule to the White House regulations office. The review process is supposed to take no more than 120 days.

This June, the administration sent the rule back for more study — even though the Transportation Department has already conducted research it has characterized as “extensive.” The department wrote to Congress that it is working to complete the rule by 2015.

Usually Congress is criticized for gridlock. But on this issue, Congress stepped up and issued a clear mandate to prevent these tragedies. The Obama administration — and, probably, anonymous lobbyists — is obstructing Congress’ will and public safety.

So I’m asking a federal court to order the Transportation Department to issue the rear-visibility regulation. The case’s coalition of petitioners, represented by Public Citizen, includes another parent who struck her child while backing up her car, along with Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, KidsAndCars.org and Consumers Union. Congress legislated the 2011 deadline so that the rules would be issued in a timely fashion to avoid heartbreaking, preventable deaths. This will come too late for Cameron, but it will save thousands of other children’s lives.

Greg Gulbransen is a pediatrician in New York.

(c) 2013, The Washington Post

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • ‘Poor doors’ inevitable in Manhattan real estate

    Everybody’s mad about the “poor door.” This is the name critics have bestowed upon the separate entrance for the affordable-housing units at a planned new luxury building on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. Those who pay market rates would have access to extra amenities – gym, pool, Hudson River views – as well as their own doors and lobby.

  • 3 ideas from Paul Ryan’s poverty plan that liberals can love

    Liberals are used to hating Rep. Paul Ryan.

  • Ignoring climate change could sink the US economy

    Good economic decisions require good data. And to get good data, we must account for all relevant variables. But we’re not doing this when it comes to climate change — and that means we’re making decisions based on a flawed picture of future risks. While we can’t define future climate-change risks with precision, they should be included in economic policy, fiscal and business decisions because of their potential magnitude.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category