Florida waiting for federal water resources funds

Cargo ship at PortMiami.
Cargo ship at PortMiami.


Florida is making the most of its 14 deepwater ports with investments aimed at improving the state’s competitiveness in the global economy. Florida’s port expansion plans will create a more efficient freight-handling system and make the state more attractive to companies interested in relocating to Florida.

Floridians will benefit from port expansion with lower transportation costs and state and local governments will benefit from additional tax revenues.

However, there is one obstruction affecting the process of improving Florida’s ports: The federal government must approve port projects before they can be done, whether or not federal funds are used in the project.

The U.S. Senate recently passed the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), which now is being considered in the House. This bill, if passed, would have several positive effects on Florida, including: authorization for important projects such as Everglades restoration; spending for maintenance dredging projects; and expansion of a public-private partnership (P3) pilot financing program for navigation, flood and storm projects

Passage of the WRDA will complement the substantial investments Florida already has made to improve the quality of its ports system — identified as being critical to realizing Florida’s goal of becoming the premier trade hub for U.S. trade with Latin America, the Caribbean and other regions of the world. Investments in Florida’s port system have encouraged private-sector investments in logistics capacity in our state.

Maximizing the benefits of both public and private-sector investments depends on proper coordination so that benefits of other components of the logistics system can create efficiencies. These efficiencies are critical for Florida’s recovery from the recent recession, which had a severe impact on the state.

There are two steps to getting a federal project done under the WRDA. First, the project must be authorized, then the project funds must be appropriated. The uncertainty associated with federal appropriations has caused Florida to commit state funds to projects in both Miami and Jacksonville because of their importance in improving Florida’s competitiveness in the world. Under the WRDA, the Miami dredging project would receive a federal appropriation that would reimburse the state, as Florida has already paid the federal portion so that PortMiami will be ready for post-Panamax ships when the Panama Canal expansion is completed in 2014. The Miami and Jacksonville projects, along with important projects in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (authorized in WRDA 2000), are important to Florida’s business and environmental future.

Funds from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund would be required to be spent in the same year they are collected and be fully spent on harbor and port operation and maintenance if the WRDA is passed. This would require the fees paid for port use to be spent on upkeep of ports and not for other purposes. This will help Florida ports continue to improve their efficiency and compete against ports in other states.

Passage of the WRDA will make Florida’s transportation and logistics system more efficient and create jobs in our state. Florida’s U.S. senators and representatives should support the WRDA to help Florida’s competitiveness in the world economy.

Dominic M. Calabro is president and chief executive officer of Florida TaxWatch.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald



    Joy-Ann Reid: Why some fear the police

    If you’ve never feared the police — if you don’t get a dull ache in the pit of your stomach when you see red and blue flashing lights, even when you know you’re not doing anything wrong — consider yourself lucky.


    In Florida governor’s race, no limit on nastiness

    Gov. Rick Scott on Monday ramped up an asphalt agenda, calling for more lanes on Interstate 295 in Jacksonville and millions more for airports and seaports.



    Intervening in Syria comes with a price tag

    Hillary Clinton recently reignited the who-lost-Syria debate when she suggested that President Barack Obama made a mistake in not intervening more forcefully early in the Syrian civil war by arming the pro-democracy rebels. I’ve been skeptical about such an intervention — skeptical that there were enough of these “mainstream insurgents,” skeptical that they could ever defeat President Bashar Assad’s army and the Islamists and govern Syria.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category