The readers’ forum

Vote to save fish species

 

The Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission is considering various alternatives for regulating the Boca Grande Jig. I would like to provide some context for making the best decision for all parties concerned, based on my great-grandfather Theodore Roosevelt’s leadership.

Roosevelt’s approach was relatively simple, straightforward and sensible. He saw that there are two fundamental approaches that are not mutually exclusive, but both have their place — preservation and conservation. An easy way to understand the difference is to compare the National Park Service to the U.S. Forest Service. Parks are meant to be preserved in a state altered as little as possible by man. Forests are meant to be conserved so they may be a continuing source of natural resources from generation to generation. A relatively small portion of the land should be preserved and by far the greater amount conserved.

In situations requiring conservation, the issue is always one of balance: How much should be consumed today and how much saved for tomorrow? One can always argue where the line should be drawn, and these are legitimate arguments, but the extreme and illegitimate positions are usually clear and inappropriate.

Roosevelt understood this but usually felt we should err on the side of protecting future generations, as the immediate benefits are so attractive that they can cloud our vision.

The Boca Grande Jig issue is clearly one that falls into the conservation side. The job of the commissioners is to decide whether or not the Jig is sufficiently destructive to require its banning.

I urge the commission to remember Theodore Roosevelt’s wise approach to these kinds of problems and rule accordingly. I think it’s very clear that his stand on this issue would be saving the species for future generations so that everyone can enjoy the fishery.

Tweed Roosevelt, Boston, Mass.

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    Eastern Shores flotilla is ridiculous

    Jenny Staletovich’s Aug. 24 article, Floating homes may be answer to rising seas, seems to be nothing more than a biased piece for the developers. Most troubling is that the article says there is no opposition to this concept.

  • Cop cameras needed

    Re the Aug. 22 article Mayor Gimenez wants cameras on all police: I’m a criminal-defense lawyer and former prosecutor. I defend cops when they’re accused of a crime. I’ve handled thousands of cases, but only a small fraction had video. With the videos, the truth always seems to come out. Without video, it’s your word against that of the police, and guess who wins that argument?

  • Nan Rich slighted

    Only the cynical can exult in the short shrift Democrat Nan Rich got from most of the media, enabling her chameleon-like competitor to crush her in her party’s primary. It was a disgrace shown this accomplished woman who never once has let her party down.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category