Missing in Syria debate: Weighing the ethics of war

 

McClatchy Washington Bureau

As the Obama administration continues to weigh its options in Syria after last week’s alleged chemical weapons attack, the conversation has stayed away from one of the murkier issues of war: its moral implications.

A majority of Americans don’t support military intervention in the Syrian conflict; a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken the same week as the attack shows just 9 percent of U.S. citizens support an armed response to the Syrian regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons. President Barack Obama said Wednesday that diplomacy is still the ideal solution and that the U.S. is willing to work with whomever necessary to find a peaceful resolution.

But much of the public debate about using military force in Syria has revolved around the practical justifications for and against armed involvement in the embattled Middle East nation. But unlike past conflicts, this debate has largely lacked a moral discussion over peaceful vs. lethal options.

“Particularly in the U.S., the practical angle always comes first in the picture. This is about how much it’s going to cost . . . and so on and so forth,” said Francesco Mancini, senior director of research at the International Peace Institute.

Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary-general, pushed a moral agenda on Wednesday morning at the Peace Palace in The Hague. “Earlier today, right here in Peace Palace, I said give peace a chance,” he said. “Give diplomacy a chance. Stop fighting and start talking.”

But his plea was easily drowned out when, hours later, Britain courted the U.N. Security Council for approval on its draft Syria resolution. Although the council failed to reach an agreement on the resolution, it could still be put to a vote.

A smattering of moral and religious leaders have blasted Western calls for armed responses, urging caution and patience in the aftermath of the purported chemical attack.

Britain’s archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, warned Parliament members against what he called “rushing to judgment” in Syria. In an interview with the country’s Daily Telegraph on Tuesday, he said a simple solution “doesn’t exist,” but he cautioned against a quick reaction from Parliament as members returned to London for an emergency vote on the issue Thursday. Parliament rejected military action in Syria, and Prime Minister David Cameron said he would not override the vote in the House of Commons.

Back in the states, the Rev. Gary Hall, dean of Washington National Cathedral, echoed Welby’s cautious position, saying the situation leaves him with a mixed response. “I’m really ambivalent and confused at this point. I tend with most Americans to not want us to get involved in another war in the Middle East. On the other hand, the human rights disaster in Syria is really troubling,” he said. “So I’m not really at this moment prepared to assign a statement opposing whatever the president is planning without understanding it more.”

On Tuesday, the Vatican’s newsletter leveled harsh criticism on Western nations’ plans for military intervention, saying the move was premature given the U.N.’s continuing investigation into the attacks. The U.N., it said, was caught in a crossfire as it weighed a continuing investigation against calls for authorization of armed responses.

“Various international actors appear no longer to consider the investigation a determining factor,” the newsletter said. Pope Francis has consistently called for peaceful approaches to Syria, and most recently he addressed the conflict in Sunday’s prayers. “With great suffering and concern I continue to follow the situation in Syria,” he said, according to a Vatican Radio translation. “It is not confrontation that offers hope to resolve problems, but rather the ability to meet and dialogue.”

But some experts said a moral stance, at this point, is severely diluted by two years of inaction on the administration’s part.

“The U.S. administration has cornered itself a little bit with this idea of the red line. . . . There is now a huge pressure on the administration to do something. And this something, at this stage, it’s about signaling,” said Mancini. “It is about punishing, and signaling to Assad that chemical weapons are not an option.”

But that signal in itself could carry mixed messages. The death toll in Syria has been steadily climbing since the civil war began more than two years ago. By only taking action after a chemical attack, experts said, the administration could seem passive on the myriad of other means by which Syrians have been killed.

“If you’ve seen any of the pictures, it’s definitely heart wrenching,” said Matthew Baum, a professor and expert on foreign policy and international politics at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. “You know, death by sarin is, I’m sure, horrific. But death by shrapnel is not a good thing, either.”

Mancini echoed Baum’s observation, saying an airstrike, at this point, implies that targeting civilians is only unacceptable when the method is a chemical attack.

“Chemical weapons are wrong, but traditional weapons (are OK). . . . As long as you don’t use chemical weapons, we’re fine,” Mancini said, when explaining the convoluted message an airstrike could send. “It’s a big dilemma, I think.”

Read more World Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
FILE - In this file photo taken May 21, 2011, miners work at a legal mining concession in Huaypetue, Madre de Dios, Peru. Government efforts to halt illegal mining have mostly been futile. The miners already have been clashing with police while intermittently blocking traffic on the commercially vital interoceanic highway that links the Pacific coast with Brazil. But officials insist this time they’re serious about combatting the multi-billion-dollar illegal mining trade that accounts for about 20 percent of Peru’s gold exports.

    Deadline lapses in Peru for illegal gold miners

    The clock has run out for an estimated 40,000 illegal gold miners who had until Saturday to legalize their status in a region of southeastern Peru where fortune-seekers have ravaged rainforests and contaminated rivers. The government's vow to enforce a ban on illegal mining is raising fears of bloody confrontations.

  •  
Damaged buses are seen at the scene of an explosion at a bus park in Abuja, Nigeria, Monday, April. 14, 2014. Suspected Islamic militants struck at the heart of Nigeria with a massive rush-hour explosion at a bus station Monday that killed 71, with the toll expected to rise in the deadliest attack yet on the nation’s capital.

    Islamic militants claim this week's Nigeria blast

    Islamic extremists Saturday claimed responsibility for the massive rush-hour explosion earlier this week that ripped through a busy bus station in Nigeria's capital, Abuja, killing at least 75 people and wounding 141.

  • Egypt's censorship board head resigns in film spat

    The head of Egypt's censorship board says he has resigned after the country's prime minister overruled his decision to allow a film starring a sultry Lebanese singer be shown.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category