Reaction to verdict isn’t racist

 

While many of us were disgusted by the jurors’ verdict of not guilty in the George Zimmerman trial , it didn’t imply that he was innocent. He wasn’t. However, I take exception to Alecia McGregor’s reflections in the Aug. 18 Other Views article, Will Trayvon become a new racial slur? and how she implies that this sad case involved racism and discrimination. It did not.

There were many indications that Zimmerman had never been racist or practiced discrimination. The unfortunate personal experience of her brother upon hearing white patrons of the restaurant where he was working cheering the verdict is no less racist than the cheers of black college students, which were seen in video clips, upon hearing the not-guilty verdict in the infamous O.J. Simpson trial.

Joe Feinberg,

Coral Gables

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    The Americans with Disabilities Act opened doors

    July 26 marked the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a landmark law passed in 1990 that for the first time in our history created nationwide standards for combating discrimination against people with disabilities in employment, transportation, public accommodation, communications, telecommunications relay services and government activities.

  • Clean energy jobs

    In the discussion of how to combat climate change it is important to make sure the voices of working families are included. This is especially true right here in South Florida, ground zero for the impact of climate change. If Gov. Rick Scott and our other elected leaders ignore the problem, the consequences of rising sea levels, extreme heat events, and decreased water availability will be a burden passed along to working families.

  • Lure of free money

    If Joy-Ann Reid were honest, she would tell folks that the ACA was written by Democrats specifically to prevent people who enroll in the federal exchange from receiving subsidies, as subsidies would be available only in the state run exchanges. The Democrats thought the lure of free money would encourage the states to set up their own exchanges. This was no drafting error, as plainly seen by the wording of the act, which in several sections clearly stated that subsidies would be for state exchanges only. Democrats wrote and passed this bill, apparently without reading it.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category