AFTERMATH OF VERDICT

Post Zimmerman verdict, Gov. Scott missed opportunity to lead

 
 
dockery
dockery

pdockery@floridavoices.com

I spent the greater part of early July glued to the televised George Zimmerman trial. And, just like many others, I had preconceived notions of what the outcome should be.

The only story being told was that of an innocent kid who — unarmed and minding his own business while walking to his father’s home from the store — was shot in cold blood by a wannabe cop stalking him. It’s not surprising that my initial reaction based on emotion and sympathy for the family of the murdered black teen was that Zimmerman was guilty of some degree of murder or manslaughter.

Initially, it seemed inconceivable that Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, had not been charged in some way with Trayvon Martin’s death last February in Sanford. Public sentiment grew and cries for an arrest became louder.

Despite the ongoing investigation that appeared to support Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense, Gov. Rick Scott bowed to political pressure and intervened by appointing State Attorney Angela Corey as special prosecutor in the case.

Corey made several mistakes. First, in an effort to appease those demanding a quick indictment, she chose to forego a grand jury investigation and charge Zimmerman through her office. And despite scant evidence to prove her case “beyond a reasonable doubt,” she charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder. Not only would she need to show that he acted with a “depraved mind,” but she would have to overcome the tough affirmative offense of self-defense.

In our justice system, a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty. This concept is one we all should embrace, as it affords us protections against false claims and imprisonment. It also limits the ability of those in power to inflict their will on those who are powerless.

Trials aren’t about emotion or political pressure or sympathy for the families. They must be about facts and evidence and adhering to the laws, rules and court procedures.

It soon became clear by the lack of evidence that the state had overcharged. The prosecution started with a weak case, did not present a compelling argument, did not properly prepare witnesses, relied on emotion and, ultimately, did not meet its burden of proof.

Members of the jury, to their credit, followed the jury instructions and returned a not guilty verdict on both second-degree murder and the lesser-included offense of manslaughter after concluding there was reasonable doubt.

Many were disappointed because the outcome did not fit the narrative they had come to believe, or because they couldn’t come to terms with, the fact that someone could have been shot dead and the shooter did not get convicted. But from a legal standpoint, the system worked and the verdict was just because the prosecution was unable to prove its case based on the evidence, the facts and current laws.

The governor released a short statement basically saying that justice was served and that the jury had spoken. Legally, he was correct. But politically, he missed a great opportunity to lead, to begin the healing and to reach out to those who feel that justice was not served.

Those dissatisfied with the verdict are left questioning our laws. One such group, the Dream Defenders, took up residence in the governor’s office demanding changes in our laws. They stayed for a month.

The governor waited too long to meet with the Defenders, and dismissed them too quickly. They deserved to be listened to and offered a seat at the table to discuss their ideas for the future.

I applaud them for engaging in meaningful political dialogue and seeking action from their governor and their Legislature. What is perplexing is that the protesters are focusing on the “stand your ground” law while the Zimmerman acquittal was based on a self-defense claim. In fact, Zimmerman waived his right to a Stand Your Ground defense hearing.

Folks on both sides are stoking the fire and contributing to the misinformation.

Stand Your Ground is not the problem. And a special session is not the answer.

The Legislature should announce fall hearings focusing on criminal-justice reform that seeks a comprehensive review of the criminal code — including sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimums, jury instruction, standard of proof and judicial discretion. Our patchwork of new and amended laws has created some potential confusion, conflict, and inequities. A thorough review offers a great opportunity for meaningful bipartisan input.

This should be an honest and sincere effort led by open-minded leaders. The hearings should be inclusive of legal professionals, law enforcement and all other interested stakeholders.

A lack of trust and tolerance is the problem and a sincere effort to listen and be inclusive is the answer.

Paula Dockery is a syndicated columnist who served in the Florida Legislature for 16 years as a Republican from Lakeland.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
Tony Lesesne

    STOPPED BY COPS

    Tony Lesesne: Overkill, and an apology

    Yes, it happens in South Florida, too — and it shouldn’t. Black men pulled over, needlessly hassled by police officers who give the rest of their colleagues a bad name, who make no distinction when a suspect has no other description than ‘black male,’ who harass residents because they can. A North Miami Beach officer pulls over a black man in a suit and tie — and behind the wheel of an Audi that simply had to be stolen, right? In another Miami-Dade city, an officer demands that an African-American man installing a vegetable garden justify why he has a shovel and seedlings. Detained for possession of cilantro? Here are five South Floridians who tell of their experiences in this community and beyond, years ago, and all too recently.

  •  
Delrish Moss

    STOPPED BY COPS

    Delrish Moss: Out after dark

    “I was walking up Seventh Avenue, just shy of 14th street. I was about 17 and going home from my job. I worked at Biscayne Federal Bank after school. The bank had a kitchen, and I washed the dishes. A police officer gets out of his car. He didn’t say anything. He came up and pushed me against a wall, frisked me, then asked what I was doing walking over here after dark. Then he got into his car and left. I never got a chance to respond. I remember standing there feeling like my dignity had been taken with no explanation. I would have felt better about that incident had I gotten some sort of dialogue. I had not had any encounters with police.

  • STOPPED BY COPS

    Bill Diggs: Hurt officer’s feelings

    “I’m the first generation in my family to go to college, and if I wanted to do nothing else, I wanted to make my mom happy. I was living for my parents, I wanted to be that guy, I wanted to go to work and not have to put on steel-toe boots. And here I am in Atlanta, I have finally grown to a particular level of affluence. I wasn’t making a lot of money, but I was a college kid, wearing a suit, driving a nice BMW going to work everyday. Can’t beat that. I would leave my house, drive up Highway 78, the Stone Mountain area, grab some coffee, go to work. So on this particular morning, there’s a cop who’s rustling up this homeless guy outside the gas station where I was filling up. I’m shaking my head, the cop looks at me. This homeless guy is there every morning. I get in my car and on to the expressway. The police officer comes shooting up behind me. I doing 65, 70. He gets up behind me, I notice he’s following me. I get in one lane, he gets in the lane, I get in another lane, he gets in that lane. He finally flips his lights on, he comes up to the car. I’ve been pulled over for speeding before, I know the drill. Got my hands up here, don’t want to get shot, and I think he’s going to say what I’ve heard before: ‘License and registration, please.’ He says ‘Get out of the car!’ and he reaches in and grabs me by my shirt. He says, ‘So you’re a smart ass, huh?’ Finally he says, ‘License and registration.’ I tell him it’s in the car. He says, ‘Get it for me!’ He goes back to his car, comes back and asks, ‘So where did you get the car from?’ I say ‘It’s a friend of mine’s.” He says, ‘Is it stolen? What are you doing driving your friend’s car?’ I finally asked, ‘Is there a reason you stopped me? You followed me, what’s up, man?’ He says, ‘I’m going to let you go with a warning, but if you see me doing what I’ve got to do for my job, don’t you ever f---ing worry about it.”

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category