Cruise passenger ‘Bill of rights’ purely illusory

In the past when events occurred on cruise ships, they generally took place on the high seas out of sight of the public and the media. These days, however, everyone has a camera in their cell phone and accordingly, most events are no longer hidden from public view.

With the advent of the social and real time media, pictures and videos taken by passengers literally go viral almost instantaneously. This has resulted in a new era of transparency, which will ultimately result in holding cruise lines more accountable and responsive to their passengers.

In response to the dramatic images taken by passengers enduring the aftermath of the fires aboard the Carnival Triumph and Splendor and the grounding of the Costa Concordia , the cruise industry trade group announced last week that its members had voluntarily adopted a Passenger’s Bill of Rights. Unfortunately for cruise ship passengers this self-laudatory proclamation is largely meaningless window dressing as these so-called “rights” either already exist or are subject to so many qualifications that they are essentially insignificant.

To proclaim that their member cruise lines are being generous and caring by agreeing to refund their passengers full fares when their cruise is canceled due to a mechanical failure (Right No. 2) is disingenuous at best. Are the cruise lines saying they had the right to keep your money even when they canceled your cruise before this proclamation?

Likewise, cruise ships are already required to properly train their crews in emergency and evacuation procedures (Right No. 5) and to have emergency power sources (Right No. 6) under existing Coast Guard, flag state, classification society and international regulations. Similarly, all cruise ships already carry ship’s doctors and nurses (Right No. 3) as a result of either U.S. statute, flag state requirements or the previously adopted American College of Emergency Physicians Cruise Ship Guidelines.

The supposed “right to disembark” a ship which cannot provide basic necessities such as “food [and] water” (Right No. 1) does not have any effect when ships are dead in the water on the high seas, as in the case of the recent Carnival Triumph and Splendor fires, unless you have your own personal helicopter to pick you up. Even when the ship is in port, the right to disembark is subject to the limitations and restrictions imposed by the port state’s immigration authorities and the discretion of the captain.

Perhaps the better question is why would a cruise line want to imprison its passengers on a ship without power and the ability to provide food, water, and sanitation facilities, rather than let them go ashore?

Not only are these so-called “rights” largely meaningless from a practical standpoint, but they are also designed to distract attention from the real problems that cruise ship passengers face as consumers. Cruise ship tickets and other documents that passengers are required to sign during cruises contain many fine print provisions, which are designed to take away their basic rights when they are injured or killed during the course of a cruise as a result of the negligence of the cruise line, its agents, partners and joint venturers.

Although Congress has specifically tackled and outlawed some of these tactics, it has not addressed others, which have received mixed treatment from the courts in the absence of such direct Congressional guidance.

For example, most passengers are shocked to discover that the cruise lines typically insert a clause in tickets on European, Asian and South American itineraries, which seek to limit their right to recover damages, even in the case of death or catastrophic injury, to a fluctuating international monetary scale, which is equivalent to approximately $70,000. Tickets also sometimes require suit to be filed in foreign countries, most notably Italy in the case of the Costa Concordia, even when the ticket was purchased in the United States, the passenger is an American citizen and the cruise line maintains considerable domestic business operations.

These are just a few of the ploys designed to insulate the cruise lines and their business partners from legal responsibility for their negligence. In order for there to be meaningful reform and consumer protection in the cruise industry, these are the types of problems which must be addressed — not the illusory problems found in the CLIA Passenger Bill of Rights.

Robert Peltz is an attorney at the Miami-based law firm of Leesfield & Partners and chairman of the Maritime Law Association.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  • In My Opinion

    When journalism is too good to be true

    When a Gallup poll this summer showed that 80 percent of Americans have little faith in the news media, there was a good deal of consternation in U.S. newsrooms. Some of it came from me. We’re used to getting called liars by the hucksters and connivers and knaves we write about. But it’s pretty frustrating to hear that readers don’t trust us, either.



    Past looms large in Islamist outlook

    The radical Islamists want to kill Pope Francis, according to the Italian daily Il Tempo. I’m not surprised. The permanent enemy of these anachronistic characters is Christianity, not the Jews.


    Finding justice on racial issues through the ballot

    The eyes of America remain focused on Ferguson, Missouri, gripped by the aftermath of Michael Brown’s death. The anguish of Ferguson — from the murder of an unarmed young person of color, to the lack of accountability fueled by a sheer disregard for black lives — is all too familiar for Florida.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category