Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

Protecting the public’s privacy

 

OUR OPINION: President’s soothing words on NSA’s snooping aren’t sufficient

HeraldEd@MiamiHerald.com

President Obama last week made welcome promises to bring transparency into the NSA’s cyber-surveillance programs. What he failed to do, however, is promise to actually stop the NSA from snooping.

At times, it seemed that former constitutional law professor Barack Obama, champion of civil liberties, was engaged in a debate, right there on the White House podium, with President Obama, commander-in-chief and overseer of a vast security system with a wide reach into the private communications of Americans.

On the one hand, Mr. Obama expressed sympathy with Americans who fear “U.S.-Big Brother looking down on you, collecting telephone records, et cetera.”

He proposed four initiatives to placate critics of the National Security Agency’s extensive communications intercept programs.

First, he said, he would pursue undefined “reforms” to Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which collects telephone records. He also promised to authorize a civil-liberties advocate before the secret court that approves warrants for intrusive actions; disclosed that NSA is creating a civil-liberties office; and said he would create a blue-ribbon panel to examine “our entire intelligence and communication technologies.”

All of these are good ideas.

But there was precious little indication of real and effective change in the programs that have raised all the privacy concerns. Facing a challenging question, Mr. Obama suddenly switched to his commander-in-chief hat:

“When I looked through specifically what was being done, my determination was that the two programs in particular that had been at issue, 215 and 702, offered valuable intelligence that helps us protect the American people, and they’re worth preserving,” he said.

Bottom line: Expect more transparency in the cyber-surveillance programs, but don’t expect any substantive changes.

Mr. Obama’s soothing words are not going to satisfy anyone who fears the reach of the government’s spying programs, nor should they.

The government wants the unqualified right to intercept all communications its computers can snare and examine all those believed to be suspicious — in secret, and apparently without regard to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of “probable cause.”

That’s the heart of the issue, and one Mr. Obama is apparently unwilling to touch. That leaves it up to Congress to go further.

One way would be to limit, or do away with altogether, the immunity that Congress itself granted to communications companies to protect them from lawsuits by consumers who wanted their privacy safeguarded.

The result is that these companies have no incentive to refuse to comply with any government order, even one that might violate privacy rights.

Changing that would give the companies a stake in preserving the privacy of the public, which might make the government think twice before demanding private information it may not be entitled to.

The events of 9/11 made Americans more conscious about the need for security and protection against terrorism. But the 9/11 Commission warned of the need to safeguard civil liberties while protecting the homeland.

“This shift of power and authority to the government calls for an enhanced system of checks and balances to protect the precious liberties that are vital to our way of life,” the commission declared.

Today, when Americans have learned a lot about the extent of cyber-surveillance of their private communications, the commission’s prescient warning is even more meaningful than it was a decade ago.

Read more Editorials stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi is appealing judge’s decision to allow gay couples to marry.

    Miami Herald | ONLINE EDITORIAL

    Time to move on, Ms. Bondi

    OUR OPINION: Florida attorney general fighting uphill battle with same-sex marriage defense

  •  
SAENZ

    Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    The Herald recommends

    OUR OPINION: For Miami-Dade Circuit, County Courts

  •  
LOBREE

    Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

    The Herald recommends

    OUR OPINION: For Miami-Dade County Circuit Court

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category