POLITICS

Hillary Clinton on TV may help Republicans

 

Mcarlson3@bloomberg.net

When I heard that Alec Baldwin might be hosting a weekly show on MSNBC, I was delighted: Maybe I wouldn’t have to catch reruns of 30 Rock to get my Baldwin fix. Let’s hope he doesn’t take any anger-management classes before he starts.

My second thought was that this rumor, if true, will further prove Reince Priebus’ point.

Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, made the rounds last week with the usual conservative complaint about media bias. The networks are mixing entertainment and news, he says — Brian Williams making frequent cameos on NBC sitcoms, Tina Fey as Sarah Palin playing on a seemingly endless loop on NBC News. This fusion benefits Democrats, because the entertainment-industrial complex tends toward the liberal.

Priebus’ main evidence was the forthcoming two-network Hillary Clinton extravaganza: a documentary on CNN, a four-part miniseries on NBC. These two productions amount to “an extended commercial for Secretary Clinton’s nascent campaign” for president, Priebus wrote to NBC. There will be no such production about his candidate, whoever that might be.

Priebus is entitled to worry some.

With the elegant actress Diane Lane playing Clinton, there will definitely be some glamorizing going on. True, this is not some big-screen Hollywood production — but it’s not a yard sign, either. On television, everyone becomes slightly larger than life, and as Priebus says, the publicity will be free to the candidate. Where’s the equal time in that?

Maybe Priebus can console himself with another definition of “equal time.”

Of course, these docu-movies will herald Clinton’s public service and path-breaking career, but they will also feature those moments that were less, shall we say, inspirational.

That means giving equal if not more time to the one-name scandals that marked Clinton’s rise: Whitewater, Travelgate, Hillarycare, Monica and, if the shows cover the early years, Hillary-Standing-By-Her-Man after he’d been exposed for spending too much time standing by Gennifer Flowers.

Such choices can be justified on strictly apolitical grounds. Not only did these events actually happen, but a heroine always needs obstacles to overcome, too. It provides dramatic tension. If these movie-mentaries get made, Clinton may well wish her life started after she left the White House.

What’s most interesting about Priebus’s crusade is what he’s going to do if these projects proceed.

He chooses which networks air presidential debates for the Republican primaries, and he warns that “if I’ve got NBC doing a miniseries with Diane Lane . . . it makes my choice of moderators much easier.”

Most threats are tempered by the fact that the one making them usually doesn’t want to actually carry it out.

This applies equally to countries with nuclear weapons as to parents warning a child he won’t get to go to sleep-away camp if he continues to misbehave. In both cases, following through is going to hurt the threatener as much as, if not more than, the threatened.

Priebus’ ultimatum is that rare threat that’s win-win. If NBC and CNN relent, he’ll presumably be happy. If they don’t, he’ll be happy as well.

He made the case in his post-campaign autopsy of the party that the debates did grievous harm to the Republican brand, allowing viable candidates to share the stage with marginal characters auditioning to be the next Alec Baldwin.

While the debates hurt the eventual nominee, self-deporting Mitt Romney, they helped the relatively unknown Herman Cain (now on radio) and Michele Bachmann (who’ll get a show a nanosecond after she leaves Congress in 2015).

The loser who was the biggest winner of all was Newt Gingrich: Before 2012, he was just a failed former speaker of the House of Representatives. Then came the famous debate that moderator John King (of CNN, coincidentally — or not?) opened by asking Gingrich if he had requested an “open marriage” from his ex-wife.

Gingrich claimed to be “appalled” at the “destructive, vicious, negative” question. Yet he could barely hide his delight as the audience cheered.

His prize was not to become the nominee but to start, next month, as co-host of CNN’s Crossfire. Anyone who doubts the phenomenon, tune in to Fox News, where Mike Huckabee, failed 2008 candidate, still has a show.

The most interesting show to watch — and I hope the rumors are true — will be MSNBC’s.

Which Alec Baldwin will be hosting — the cynical Jack Donaghy? The crass Capitol One huckster? The mischievous Academy Awards co-host? The political junkie who wanted to run for mayor of New York? Maybe he will settle for playing all these things on TV.

Whichever Baldwin shows up, I’m pretty sure Reince Priebus won’t like it.

Margaret Carlson is a Bloomberg View columnist.

© 2013, Bloomberg News

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">GAZA DESTRUCTION:</span> Palestinians sit amid the rubble of a building this week while attending a “victory rally” organized by the military wing of Hamas.

    MIDDLE EAST

    People of Gaza must be helped

    Now that the guns have fallen silent, leaders of Israel and Hamas are busy trying to convince their respective peoples that they emerged victorious from this 50-day war.

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE:</span> The rise of a terrorist state in the Middle East may be the defining crisis of President Obama’s presidency.

    WHITE HOUSE

    Obama too detached to lead?

    Having once served a president, I don’t begrudge any president a vacation. There is, in fact, no escape from this relentless job. A change of scenery does not involve a change in responsibilities, or even a release from the essence of the president’s routine.

  •  
REGALADO

    IMMIGRATION/EDUCATION

    Up close and personal with migrant children in Dade school

    This year, on the first day of the academic calendar, I kicked off the day at Francis Tucker Elementary in Coconut Grove donating book bags and supplies to excited kindergartners in this historic and economically fragile neighborhood of the City of Miami.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category