the white house

Obama seeks to soothe surveillance fears


McClatchy Washington Bureau

President Barack Obama unveiled a series of proposals Friday that could curtail the federal government’s ability to spy on Americans, in light of eroding confidence by the public after recent leaks about the massive surveillance programs.

Obama announced at a news conference that in an effort to provide greater oversight and transparency, he’ll urge changes to the USA Patriot Act, which bolstered law enforcement’s ability to gather intelligence in the United States after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and to the secret court that approves government surveillance programs.

“It’s not enough for me as president to have confidence in these programs,” Obama said in the White House’s ornate East Room. “The American people need to have confidence in them, as well.”

The president spoke in generalities, failing to outline many specific changes, saying simply that he’ll need to convince a divided — and often dysfunctional — Congress to make the most significant modifications.

On Capitol Hill, some lawmakers from both parties have supported the surveillance programs for years, while others said they were never informed of the extent of the data collection and want changes.

Obama’s decision marks a stunning turnaround for a president who’s repeatedly downplayed the scope of the programs since newspapers revealed in early June that the National Security Agency is collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Verizon customers, as well as emails through nine companies, including tech giants Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and Facebook. He dismissed the uproar over the programs revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden as “hype.”

Obama said he was trying to strike a balance between protecting Americans and providing the appropriate oversight to guard against abuse.

“I want to make clear, once again, that America is not interested in spying on ordinary people,” he said. “Our intelligence is focused above all on finding the information that’s necessary to protect our people, and in many cases, protect our allies.”

Obama has spent weeks meeting with people behind closed doors as he developed his proposal. This week, he held sessions with technology industry lobbyists, civil liberties advocates and the CEOs of major technology companies, including Apple and AT&T.

The president said that his administration, which already has taken the unprecedented step of disclosing a number of documents related to the surveillance programs, would declassify a series of others about the NSA’s purpose and the government’s rationale for conducting surveillance.

He also will appoint a full-time civil liberties and privacy officer, create a website to release documents and appoint a task force of outside experts to review the programs. The task force will provide recommendations to Obama in 60 days and then again at the end of the year.

“While the initial reforms outlined by the president are a necessary and welcome first step, they are not nearly sufficient,” said Anthony D. Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Lawmakers from both parties have proposed legislation in recent weeks that would limit the scope of data collections, require an adversarial point of view when the government requests information at the secret court and add more public disclosures by the NSA.

Obama backs some of those changes, including having an adversary in the court, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Support on Capitol Hill for issues related to the NSA scandal hasn’t fallen strictly along party lines, where so many other politically controversial issues break down.

Rep. Peter King, the New York Republican who leads the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterintelligence and Terrorism, said Obama’s decision to push for changes was “a monumental failure in presidential wartime leadership and responsibility” because the programs are legal and transparent.

In the Senate, the chairwoman of the Select Committee on Intelligence, Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California, said her panel would step up public oversight with hearings this fall on U.S. data-collection programs.

“If changes are necessary, whenever possible we will make them,” Feinstein said

Obama initially had been skeptical about surveillance programs as a presidential candidate. As a senator, he supported changes to the Patriot Act that would have required the government to convince a judge that the records it was seeking have some connection to a suspected terrorist or spy.

He said he’d changed his mind after his staff evaluated the programs and expanded some of the safeguards. As president, he signed off on them, continuing many of the programs that his Republican predecessor, President George W. Bush, began after 9/11, and he engaged in an unprecedented crackdown on classified national security leaks.

Some of the surveillance programs are allowed under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which authorizes the government to ask a court for documents that would assist in an investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, established by Congress in 1978, signs off on the orders. It oversees domestic surveillance and operates in secret.

All told, the intelligence court has received 6,288 completed surveillance applications from the government since Obama took office. All have been approved.

Obama’s remarks came in a wide-ranging news conference delivered the day before the first family leaves for vacation on Martha’s Vineyard. The president fielded questions for an hour. He grew particularly animated as he lambasted congressional Republicans for what he called an “ideological fixation” on repealing his signature healthcare plan.

“The one unifying principle in the Republican Party at the moment is making sure that 30 million people don’t have healthcare,” Obama said.

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner said Republicans were “united in … repealing and replacing the president’s healthcare law because it is driving up costs, decreasing access and destroying American jobs.”

Obama also said Friday that it was appropriate for the U.S. to “take a pause” and reassess its relationship with Russia, given what he called Cold War-era thinking by President Vladimir Putin.

Obama’s remarks were his first on the sharp rebuke he delivered to the Russian president earlier this week, calling off a planned meeting in Moscow.

“We’re going to assess where the relationship can advance U.S. interests and increase peace and stability and prosperity around the world,” Obama said. “Where [we] can, we’re going to keep on working with them. Where we have differences, we’re going to say so clearly.”

Lesley Clark contributed to this report.

Read more Nation stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category