More women are taking their husband’s surname after they marry

Now that I’m on the wedding circuit, attending the nuptials of friends’ and relatives’ children, I’ve noticed that more and more women are forsaking their maiden name and taking their husband’s instead. In an era of growing marriage and gender equality, this seems a vote for tradition. After the “I do’s,” convention apparently is a favorite choice.

As a woman who insisted on keeping her surname in some form or another, I wonder what this means — and if it matters.

In the past year or so, various studies have confirmed what some of us assiduous observers of all things cultural had already recognized. The MRS. is back in fashion, though if you look at the numbers you might argue it never lost its luster.

A survey conducted by the wedding website polled nearly 19,000 women who married in 2010. Only 8 percent kept their own last names. And while 8 percent still seems like a hefty figure — only 1 percent of brides stuck with their names in the 1800s — it’s actually quite a drop from the 23 percent who did so in the 1990s. Why? Why haven’t more women stuck with their family name?

I suspect that keeping a maiden name is no longer the statement it once was. Back in the 1970s and even into the ‘80s, there was much debate about why women were expected to give up their family name. The practice seemed to underscore the inequities between husband and wife.

But now, for the most part, the battle for an equal partnership has been largely won. Husbands move for their wives’ careers. Some stay home with the children. Many cook and clean and launder, chores that were once considered solely women’s work.

Danielle Tate, founder of the marital name change website, told a Chicago Tribune reporter that today’s young couples assume equality as a given. “They don’t even fathom not being an equal partner in their relationships, so changing their names isn’t as weighted as it was decades ago,” she said.

When I first married, I decided to keep my maiden name for various reasons, all of which remain important to me even now, though I’m no longer a fresh-faced college graduate staking a claim to the self I was creating. For one, I loved my surname. There was something poetic about it, the way it rhymed with my first. What’s more, Veciana seemed freighted with all kinds of meaning: History. Identity. Culture. Ethnicity. For a girl whose family had moved around so much, it provided an attachment to the rest of the family in the old country, Catalonia. And above all, the name was mine, as part of me as my brown eyes or big feet.

When I finally added Suarez, my first husband’s last name, it was a concession I made reluctantly, the kind of compromise couples learn to negotiate to keep the peace. By the time he had died and I remarried, the hyphenated last name was an integral part of my professional identity. It was on everything of note I had written.

These days hyphenation is passé, but that doesn’t mean the maiden name has been sacrificed at the altar of tradition. Hardly. We women are, if anything, adaptable. Studies also show more are using maiden names as their middle names, thus staying equally loyal to the many ties that bind.

Follow Ana on Twitter @AnaVeciana.

Read more Ana Veciana Suarez stories from the Miami Herald

  • In My Opinion

    #ThrowbackThursday, #FlashbackFriday: Nostalgia that keeps us grounded

    I’m not one to indulge in nostalgia, yet I’m intrigued by all those old pictures that keep popping up in my social media feeds. You know the ones — pre-digital photos that are stamp-dated by bouffant hairdos and bushy sideburns. Photos that, before they were uploaded and posted, tagged and shared, were stripped from a yellowing page of an ancient scrapbook.

 <span class="cutline_leadin">ATTRACTING ATTENTION:</span> In its new ad campaign, Dear Kate features prominent tech women posing in its bras and panties. The collection is called the Ada Collection, named after the mathematician Ada Lovelace who wrote the first algorithm back in the 1800s.

    In My Opinion

    Ana Veciana-Suarez: Underwear ads do nothing to empower tech women

    The advertising photos are meant to be empowering, feminist even, a thumb-in-the-eye response to the well-documented sexism of the tech world. Yet, I glance at these beautiful and beautifully talented women posing in their skivvies and think, This ain’t the way to get respect, sisters.

 <span class="cutline_leadin">MOMENTS BEFORE TRAGEDY:</span> A  video  shows the girl, in pink shorts and braided ponytail, with her hands clutched around the grip of the submachine gun.

    In My Opinion

    Ana Veciana-Suarez: A 9-year-old with an Uzi? That’s crazy

    There is nothing, absolutely nothing logical or sensible or worthwhile in having a 9-year-old learn to use an Uzi. No reason, none whatsoever, for a child to handle a fully automatic gun.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category