Insurance rates in N.Y. to plunge under Obamacare

 

Sorry to interrupt the incessant drone about the “failure” of Obamacare, but from the state of New York comes news that insurance policies in the individual market could cost as much as 50 percent less when the marketplaces called for in the Affordable Care Act get started next year.

Here’s how a front-page story in The New York Times describes the situation:

“State insurance regulators say they have approved rates for 2014 that are at least 50 percent lower on average than those currently available in New York. Beginning in October, individuals in New York City who now pay $1,000 a month or more for coverage will be able to shop for health insurance for as little as $308 monthly. With federal subsidies, the cost will be even lower.”

Only about 17,000 people in New York currently purchase insurance on their own, according to The Times. That leaves about 2.6 million uninsured. The federal Affordable Care Act requires everyone to purchase an insurance policy, which will create a deeper and wider pool, and enable insurers to reduce rates.

New York probably isn’t typical of how things will work in all states. Its policies on the individual market are the most expensive in the nation. Why? Because the state requires insurers to offer people policies regardless of preexisting conditions, but has no mandate that everyone must purchase insurance. That’s a formula for sky high rates and lots of uninsured people. And it’s exactly what Republican politicians are asking for when they demand that the White House postpone the controversial individual mandate.

So in New York, prices have nowhere to go but down.

But other states that are working hard to set up insurance exchanges, like California, Oregon, Washington, Maryland and Vermont, are also reporting encouraging news about competition among insurers and competitive rates in the marketplaces.

Not exactly the imaginary “train wreck” that has the U.S. House preparing to vote to repeal Obamacare for, what, the 38th time?

Obamacare opponents, for their part, are touting a new survey by a strident foe of the health care law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which found that two-thirds of employers surveyed said they weren’t ready for the law’s new mandates. And 71 percent said they’d be less likely to hire because of the law, which requires companies with 50 or more full-time employees to offer health insurance or pay a fine.

Is a small business ever ready for a new mandate? I think not. Really, it’s surprising that a third of the employers surveyed said they were prepared. This is beginning to sound like the way most Americans approach the Christmas holiday. We know it’s coming; it’s right there on the calendar. Yet we’re never ready for it. And somehow we always get by.

As for the threats to hire fewer workers and cut others to part time, remember that no employer covered by the Affordable Care Act’s mandate is currently required to provide health insurance to workers, but more than nine of 10 of them do. Health insurance is a tax-free form of compensation that enables companies to recruit and retain good workers. None of that is going to change.

Barbara Shelly is a columnist for the Kansas City Star.

(

© 2013 The Kansas City Star

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • Rick Perry’s comeback headed off at the pass

    It was all going so well for Texas Gov. Rick Perry — until the indictment. His efforts to move past a disastrous 2012 presidential run that had become a reliable punch line for a senior moment seemed to be working.

  • Why the Islamic State (or ISIS, or QSIS, or ISIL) has so many names

    The Guardian reports that an influential Egyptian group has requested that Western observers make a crucial nomenclature change. Egypt’s Dar al-Ifta, which the Guardian describes as “a wing of the Egyptian justice ministry … [and] a source of religious authority both inside and outside Egypt,” says that it’s not appropriate to refer to the self-proclaimed “Islamic State” that’s currently fighting in Iraq and Syria. Instead, according to Dar al-Ifta, we should call them “al-Qaida Separatists in Iraq and Syria,” or alternately QSIS. You can learn more by following the group’s “Call it QS not IS” social-media campaign.

  • Why do some hostages die and others are released?

    This last week’s deeply contrasting stories of two New Englanders caught in the Middle East’s maelstrom of violence — the savage murder of James Foley and the joyous release from captivity of Peter Theo Curtis — point to a central question: Why do some hostages die while others are released?

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category