FBI announces review of 2,000 cases featuring hair samples

 

McClatchy Washington Bureau

The FBI will review thousands of old cases, including some involving the death penalty, in which hair samples helped secure convictions, under an ambitious plan made public Thursday.

More than 2,000 cases the FBI processed from 1985 to 2000 will be re-examined, including some in which execution dates have been set and others in which the defendants already have died in prison. In a key concession, Justice Department officials will waive usual deadlines and procedural hurdles that often block inmates from challenging their convictions.

“This will be critical to giving wrongly convicted people a fair chance at a fair review,” said Steven D. Benjamin, a Virginia attorney who’s the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

The defense lawyers’ association joined with The Innocence Project, based at New York City’s Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, as well as pro bono attorneys to press for the review.

The study will focus on whether analysts exaggerated the significance of their hair analyses or reported them inaccurately. Defendants will be notified and free DNA testing offered if errors in lab work or testimony are detected.

“The government’s willingness to admit error and accept its duty to correct those errors in an extraordinarily large number of cases is truly unprecedented,” declared Peter Neufeld, a co-director of the Innocence Project. “It signals a new era in this country that values science and recognizes that truth and justice should triumph over procedural obstacles.”

DNA testing can cost several thousand dollars, Innocence Project spokesman Paul Cates said in an interview Thursday.

“There is no reason to believe the FBI Laboratory employed ‘flawed’ forensic techniques,” FBI Special Agent Ann Todd, a spokeswoman for the bureau, said in an email. “The purpose of the review is to determine if FBI Laboratory examiner testimony and reports properly reflect the bounds of the underlying science.”

Todd called microscopic hair analysis “a valid forensic technique and one that is still conducted at the lab” in conjunction with DNA testing. But in some cases, defense attorneys say, lab analysts have overstated the significance of their findings.

In 1981, for instance, an 18-year-old Washington resident named Kirk Odom was convicted of rape and sodomy. At his trial, an FBI analyst testified that Odom’s hair samples and samples taken from the crime scene “were indistinguishable” and that this was very rare. Odom was convicted and served about 22 years in prison. In 2011, he was exonerated by DNA testing that wasn’t available at the time of his original trial.

Odom’s case, along with the cases of two other Washington men who’d also been exonerated by DNA testing after convictions based, in part, on testimony about hair analysis, prompted the broader FBI review.

“The number of cases that involve potential testimony errors is not known, at this time,” Todd said.

Of 310 individuals exonerated through DNA evidence, according to an Innocence Project database, 72 were convicted in part because of microscopic hair evidence.

Some died before they could be exonerated.

In 1986, a jury convicted Army veteran Timothy Brian Cole of raping a Texas Tech University student. A lab analyst testified that there were similarities between Cole’s pubic hair and hair found on the victim. Cole died in prison in 1999, about a decade before DNA testing and the real rapist’s confession exonerated him.

In other cases, wrongly convicted defendants survived their incarceration.

Dwayne Allen Dail was convicted in 1989 of a rape in Goldsboro, N.C., after testimony from the victim, as well as from a North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation forensic chemist. The lab analyst said hairs at the crime scene could have come from Dail, and his views, though not definitive, were heard by the jurors as those of a recognized expert.

Dail was exonerated in 2007 after DNA testing.

Cates, the Innocence Project spokesman, said that “we are hopeful that state crime labs will also recognize their duty” to confirm the accuracy of past lab tests, although the agreement announced Thursday covers only testimony and reports from FBI lab analysts.

Email: mdoyle@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @MichaelDoyle10

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., right and House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., take the stairs to a news conference on Capitol Hill, in Washington, Monday, July 28, 2014, about a bipartisan deal to improve veterans' health care that would authorize at least $17 billion to fix the health program scandalized by long patient wait times and falsified records covering up delays.

    Miller faces sales job on $17B VA health care bill

    Before being elected to Congress, Rep. Jeff Miller was a real estate broker. His background in sales will come in handy as the Florida Republican tries to a sell a $17 billion deal to improve veterans health care to a GOP caucus that includes tea party members and other conservatives dead set against raising the deficit.

  •  
President Barack Obama awards the 2013 National Humanities Medal to Ellen Dunlap of the American Antiquarian Society, Worcester, Mass., during a ceremony in the East Room at the White House in Washington, Monday, July 28, 2014.

    Obama going to dinner as clock ticks toward recess

    President Barack Obama is taking four Kansas City residents out to dinner to chew over the concerns of heartland Americans, with little time remaining for action on pressing issues before Congress begins its August recess.

  • Senate to vote on highway money as deadline looms

    The Senate is set to take up legislation to keep federal highway money flowing to states, with just three days left before the government plans to start slowing down payments.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category