POLITICS

How Marco Rubio won on immigration

 
 
CILLIZZA
CILLIZZA

washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix

Marco Rubio made a giant gamble by going all-in on the immigration debate in the Senate. And he won — big time.

As the highest profile Hispanic Republican elected official in the country, this wasn’t a fight that Rubio could sidestep. If he had tried to take a lower profile role, he would have been called out for ducking the issue. Knowing he was going to get pushed into the fight, he jumped in.

Rubio methodically did everything he personally could to make sure that the certain opposition of some faction of conservatives did not paralyze the effort to pass the bill. What Rubio understood from the start was that the key to the bill succeeding was not convincing every Republican to vote for it. Rather, he sought to keep the opposition somewhat muted outside of the Senate and filibuster-free inside the chamber.

Rubio faced down his critics with regularity — doing appearances with conservative talk radio hosts like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh and on Fox News Channel. Rubio even went to the Senate floor in the final days of the immigration debate in the Senate to rebut some of the most common attacks on the bill.

The idea — forwarded by Rubio’s critics — that he will be pilloried for his support of immigration reform is based on this false premise: That Republican primary voters won’t support someone who, on a high profile issue, feels differently than they do.

People predicting doom for Rubio in 2016 over immigration tend to cite Mitt Romney’s struggles to move beyond the healthcare law he signed in Massachusetts as governor. Yes, there is no question that Romney’s past position on healthcare hurt him among conservatives in 2012. But, consider:

• There was already a storyline about Romney as a flip-flopper left over from the 2008 campaign when he changed positions on abortion. The healthcare law in Massachusetts played into the idea that Romney would say whatever fit the political moment. Rubio doesn’t have that issue.

• Romney never really got his message on healthcare right. He constantly insisted that his plan was good for Massachusetts but that it shouldn’t be replicated nationally — and never really explained why. Rubio has a clearer message: Keeping the status quo on immigration in place is far worse than the alternative he backed.

• Romney won the Republican primary.

Politicians who have failed to sell an issue position where they stand apart from their party almost always fail because they come across as inauthentic. Principled opposition can be sold — as long as it is genuinely principled.

Part of the appeal of someone like Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, for example, is not that he lines up exactly with the Republican base but rather he backs his contrary issues with genuine conviction. Opposing the use of drones is not an issue that wins Republican primaries, but Paul’s filibuster on the issue was the single most important moment in the already-started 2016 race so far this year.

Rubio will offset much — though not all — of the criticism that will come his way from conservatives by standing on principle, insisting that he thought it was the right thing to do for the country (and the Republican Party) and acknowledging that not everyone is going to agree with him on every issue.

Then there are the obvious benefits Rubio gets from his involvement in immigration.

• The major donors of the GOP — the men and women who serve as building blocks for financing presidential campaigns and write big checks to super PACs — want immigration reform. Rubio is not only on their side but now their chief advocate.

• The 50,000-foot narrative about Republicans over the past several years is that they are increasingly insular and unwilling to compromise. Rubio, by dint of his role in the Gang of Eight, can present himself as something quite different than that stereotype. Obviously that helps him with independents if he gets to the 2016 general election but we wouldn’t underestimate the number of Republicans who also might be looking for a new message/messenger come 2016.

• Rubio is now not just a Hispanic Republican senator but a Hispanic Republican senator who played a key role in trying to reform the immigration system. If ever there was a Republican candidate who could make a convincing case to Hispanics as to why they should at least consider voting GOP, Rubio is the one.

There is good and bad in any major legislative move by a politician as high profile as Rubio. But, the bad here can be counteracted and the good outweighs it anyway. Count Rubio as a winner on immigration — no matter what (if anything) the House does next.

Chris Cillizza covers the White House for The Washington Post, writes The Fix, its politics blog, and anchors political reporting for PostTV.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  • In My Opinion

    Let’s hear it for the Washington Slurs

    Twenty-four dollars.

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">Campaign:</span> Gov. Rick Scott held a meeting with senior citizens in Miami last week to hear their concerns about changes in Medicare Advantage.

    SCOTT CAMPAIGN

    Scott campaign ads serve up baloney

    The next governor of Florida could be determined by the success or failure of the Affordable Care Act. Or the perception of its success or failure as shaped by the campaigns of Rick Scott and Charlie Crist.

  •  
WENSKI

    IMMIGRATION

    Putting the immigration debate in human terms

    Former Gov. Jeb Bush has elicited the outrage of the anti-immigrant crowd with his recent comment that crossing illegally into the United States to find work to support one’s family is an “act of love.” And, he is right. As the bishops of the Second Vatican Council taught 50 years ago: “Man, who is the only creature on Earth which God willed for himself, cannot fully find himself except through a sincere gift of self.”

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category