The readers’ forum

Miami Beach is not withholding information on 2011 shootings


I was surprised and disappointed with your June 21 editorial, Shootings of unarmed black men deserve answers, and the misleading June 19 story Miami Beach must pay attorneys’ fees in Urban Beach Week shooting, regarding the Memorial Day 2011 shootings on Miami Beach.

A lawyer representing the deceased driver’s family filed a public-records lawsuit concerning the incident. Since the state attorney’s office is still conducting a criminal investigation, the city objected to producing the records based on Florida Statute Chapter 119. Circuit Court Judge Victoria Sigler agreed with the city that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the criminal investigative files. However, she granted access to the driver’s autopsy records and audio and visual recordings, pursuant to Florida Statute Chapter 406, which the lawyer did not cite in the lawsuit.

After the judge issued her order, my office promptly asked the Miami Beach Police Department to provide the records. Six weeks later the lawyer called the city stating that he had not received all the records. We immediately contacted the Police Department and found that certain audio recordings were not sent. The Police Department then sent the recordings to the lawyer.

At the next hearing, the judge clarified that her order concerning “visual recordings” also meant the decedent’s photographs and issued an order that these also be provided to plaintiffs’ attorneys. They were provided the next day.

At the last hearing, the court was advised that there were no photographs of the decedent at the crime scene and that all photographs of the decedent were delivered to plaintiffs’ lawyer. The court requested and we provided an affidavit from the lead investigator. Finally, the court stated that while the city would have to pay the plaintiffs’ lawyer fees, she would not impose sanctions because the untimely delivery of the audio recordings was not intentional.

There has never been any effort to conceal or hide any document, or to violate any court order. There is no cover-up, stonewalling or conspiracy here. The city has nothing to hide. All legitimate claims against the city will be evaluated fairly and on their merits upon conclusion of the criminal investigation by the state attorney’s office.

Jose Smith, city attorney,

Miami Beach

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    All eyes turn to Florida’s gubernatorial debate

    When it comes to election time, one state is almost certain to garner national attention.

My drawing of Mr. Wyroba in 1978.

    Tribute to a teacher

    Re the Aug. 28 obituary Thomas Wyroba, 64, beloved teacher at Miami’s New World of the Arts.

  • Dismal voting day

    A lone voter at 9:30 a.m. faced 16 poll workers at the Coral Gables Congregational Church, where four precincts were open on Election Day. As this was only a primary, there were no long lines.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category