FCAT not an accurate measure of academic improvement


Thank you for publishing Jeremy Glazer’s June 15 Other Views article, FCAT can’t capture teachers’ influence, effectiveness, about the ludicrous emphasis placed on the FCAT by our public-school system.

I was a school principal for 23 years, and Glazer confirms my belief that teachers are the ones with the clearest understanding of educational issues. The problem lies in the fact that the public education establishment is dominated by mythologies generated by both the political left and right.

From the left we get canards such as self-esteem, multiple intelligences, multi-culturalism and all the other myths that Rousseau and Dewey have bequeathed us. From the right we get the equally fallacious and misguided No Child Left Behind and its cousin, accountability.

Glazer knows a truth that most other educators don’t know or are afraid to express: There is a high correlation between standardized test scores and intellectual ability. A student’s standardized test scores can improve over time, but only to a certain point; that point being the limit of his intellectual capacity.

Standardized tests compare the individual to the group. They are not a good way to assess academic improvement, as the individual’s relationship to the group will vary little over time. If each member of a kindergarten class is given an I.Q. test at age 5, and then again when they graduate from high school, the results are going to be, by and large, the same. Schooling does not increase innate academic ability, and standardized tests measure, mostly, the academic ability of the individual when compared to other students like him or her.

When you combine the scientism of the right with the romanticism of the left you have a recipe for disaster. Add to this the vested interests of unions and political parties, and it is not hard to understand Glazer’s point. Hopefully, school districts will develop criterion-referenced, as opposed to standardized, tests that will more accurately measure student progress, because they will compare the student against his/her own base line.

I hope that the development of these tests is left to thoughtful teachers like Glazer, and not to ivory-tower academic types who haven’t seen the inside of a public-school classroom since they themselves were in high school. And I still hope and pray that, one day, we can gear our schools to start producing students who, upon reaching maturity, will want to learn on their own for the rest of their lives. This, not test scores, is the purpose of education.

Joe Carbia, Miami

Read more Speak Up stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category