Secrets piling up faster than government can declassify some

 

McClatchy Washington Bureau

In the darkened stacks of a nondescript building in the suburbs outside Washington, dozens of federal employees wearing protective gloves spend day after day sifting through millions of pages of secret documents, some of them nearly a century old.

The 70 staffers of the National Declassification Center are charged with deciding – anonymously and quietly – which of the nation’s old secrets can be laid bare for the world to see.

They have a backlog of hundreds of millions of pages marked for possible declassification, and they’re able to release those that don’t reveal information about weapons of mass destruction, harm diplomatic relations or threaten the safety of the president of the United States. But no one believes they’ll be able to make a year-end deadline set by President Barack Obama. And in the meantime, the government is classifying even more secrets.

After three and half years, just 70 million pages have been released, including the Pentagon Papers and a World War I-era recipe for secret ink. Another 45 million pages have been kept classified. The rest have yet to be fully processed. (Because the material is more than 25 years old, it’s paper and not the disks, microfilm and emails that came later.)

“It’s not going to happen,” said Steven Aftergood, who directs the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, and is an expert on – and prominent critic of – government secrecy. “That should be a signal to everyone that the system is broken. Not even the president can make it work.”

Meanwhile, the government can’t keep up with the ever-escalating onslaught of classified documents, which are accumulating faster than ever before because of the growing bureaucracy, switch to electronic data and a prevailing culture of secrecy.

Each day, federal agencies spend more time, money and effort classifying documents than declassifying them.

In fiscal year 2011, about 2,400 employees classified documents and only hundreds declassified them, according to the most recent statistics available – which exclude the backlog – from the Information Security Oversight Office. They classified information 92 million times and declassified it only 27 million times. They spent more than $11 billion to classify documents at 41 agencies – more than double the amount a decade ago – and only $53 million on declassification. (The entire tab for classification is unknown because the cost at certain intelligence agencies is, in fact, classified.)

Already, another 28 million pages are waiting to be reviewed at the National Declassification Center. And 103 million more pages are expected to be ready in the next five years, ensuring that the task will never end.

“We’re treading water,” said Sheryl Shenberger, a former CIA officer who’s the center’s director.

But, Shenberger said, the center has put a huge dent in the backlog.

“Leadership sets a goal. Sometimes it’s not a reasonable goal,” Shenberger said. “While goals can sometimes be frustrating to us, it’s a good thing to strive for.”

She later added that there’s some confusion about the exact parameters of the president’s goal but that she thinks that examining all the documents once – but not necessarily releasing them – would meet the goal, though she knows other people do not.

Obama often boasts about being the most open president in U.S. history. On his first day in office, he offered a sweeping promise of transparency, issuing a number of executive actions to provide more openness at every level of federal government.

“My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government,” Obama wrote at the time. “Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in government.”

While the president has tried to implement important transparency changes, he’s lagged behind when it comes to meeting some of his goals, including that of keeping up with classified documents.

The federal government’s reliance on secrecy – from secret documents and secret laws to secret courts and secret agencies – has come under intense scrutiny in recent weeks, since the National Security Agency acknowledged that it gathers the telephone records and monitors the Internet activities of millions of people.

Presidents have been issuing directives on classification since Franklin D. Roosevelt. It didn’t take them long to realize they had a problem with overclassification that could leave lawmakers uninformed, the government unaccountable and the public disengaged.

Still, the process for making documents secret remains much as it was 70 years ago.

President Bill Clinton tried to tackle the issue in the 1990s by calling for the automatic declassification of what was then a backlog of 200 million pages more than 25 years old. The backlog continued.

“The culture is erring on the side of classification,” said Sharon Bradford Franklin, senior counsel at the Constitution Project, a research center that studies transparency. “The mentality is zero risk.”

Obama acted on several longtime recommendations when he created the declassification center in December 2009 to conduct “automatic” reviews while implementing revised rules for classifying and declassifying documents.

But an automatic review is anything but automatic.

First, the agency that possesses the documents reviews them. Some may be released, but many others affecting more than one agency go to the declassification center.

Center employees, joined by 100 staffers from other agencies, work in a classified area – sealed from the public – in a massive white-and-glass building, which itself requires photo identification, a walk through metal detectors to get in and a check of bags to get out.

When a visitor enters the area, a red light goes off to alert employees.

Some of the documents – stored in 200 distinct types of protective boxes – are examined one page at a time. Others may be reviewed by section.

A page can remain secret for nine reasons: if it reveals the identity of a spy, a secret code, or weapons of mass destruction or war plans; if it could harm emergency preparedness plans, diplomatic activities, or the president or vice president; or if it could violate a statute, treaty or international agreement.

Some of documents that have been released were about the Katyn Forest massacre of Polish nationals in the1940s, the Air Force’s “Reports on Soviet Air Power and Strategic Nuclear Weapons” from the 1950s and the Pentagon Papers outlining the U.S.’s involvement in Vietnam through the 1960s.

A half-dozen documents in English and French that describe secret ink formulas and methods for opening sealed letters without detection from 1917 and 1918 were thought to be the oldest ones classified when they were released in 2011. “Dip a tooth pick in common milk and write between lines of an ordinary letter,” one document says. “The writing will appear by being ironed out with a hot flatiron.”

Why does it take so long to assess the documents?

Federal agencies didn’t conduct proper initial reviews of documents because of inconsistent funding, methods and goals. For example, a page might be marked DIF, which depending on the agency could mean “deny in full” or “declassify in full” while RIF could mean “redact in full” or “release in full.”

Also, multiple agencies are affected by the release of a single document. And a 1999 law requires documents to be certified as “highly unlikely” to contain classified nuclear weapons information.

Michael German, senior policy counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union Washington Legislative Office, said Obama’s revamped system was supposed to simplify declassification but it hadn’t.

“There doesn’t seem to be enough pressure for them to act,” he said. “They need to change the system so that you are protecting the things that need protecting.”

The Public Interest Declassification Board, a congressional advisory committee, made a series of recommendations to Obama last November to help streamline classification and declassification. Among them: Automatically declassify information after a shorter period than 25 years and strengthen the tiny declassification center, whose annual budget is just $9 million.

“We believe the current classification and declassification systems are outdated and incapable of dealing adequately with the large volumes of classified information generated in an era of digital communications and information systems,” the board wrote to Obama. “The government’s management of classified information must match the realities and demands in the 21st century.”

Other groups also have weighed in with proposals. The ACLU urged Congress to be more aggressive in declassifying documents and limiting who has the power to classify. The Brennan Center for Justice encourages mandatory questionnaires before classification and consequences for those who needlessly make documents secret.

In March, the administration wrote in its open-government national action plan that it was still reviewing recommendations. “Although the administration has made significant process in the past year, substantial challenges remain,” it said

Nancy Soderberg, the chairwoman of the declassification board, said she was hopeful that the administration would make the changes but that she understood the limitations.

“People tend to like the system they have,” she said. “Government and change don’t usually go together.”

Email: akumar@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @anitakumar01

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
FOR RELEASE SUNDAY, JULY 27, 2014, AT 12:01 A.M. EDT - This combination of campaign provided photos and staff photos shows Congressional candidates in the 2014 Michigan primary election. Top row, from left, are Tom Whitmire, Fred Upton, Douglas Radcliffe North, and Tim Walberg. Bottom row, from left, are Mike Bishop, Tom McMillin, Ken Darga and Susan Grettenberger.

    Michigan primary is start of US House shakeup

    Michigan primary voters will begin determining what could be one of the bigger shake-ups in the state's congressional delegation in years, a revamp that could become even larger if business-supported Republican challengers can topple tea party-backed congressmen.

  •  
FOR RELEASE SUNDAY, JULY 27, 2014, AT 12:01 A.M. EDT - This combination of campaign provided photos and staff photos shows Congressional candidates in the 2014 Michigan primary election. Top row, from left, are Tom Whitmire, Fred Upton, Douglas Radcliffe North, and Tim Walberg. Bottom row, from left, are Mike Bishop, Tom McMillin, Ken Darga and Susan Grettenberger.

    Michigan primary is start of US House shakeup

    Primary voters will begin determining what could be one of the bigger shake-ups in Michigan's congressional delegation in years.

  •  
FILE - In this March 8, 2014, file photo, Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley speaks during a general session at the California Democrats State Convention in Los Angeles. O'Malley's latest foray into Iowa begins, appropriately, in a place called Clinton. The Maryland governor is filling the void in Iowa, New Hampshire and beyond during the infancy of the 2016 presidential race, campaigning for fellow Democrats and making personal appeals while former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton remains the prohibitive, if undeclared, favorite. Starting the weekend in Clinton, Iowa, the relatively unknown O'Malley is trying to lay the groundwork for a presidential campaign whether Clinton runs or not.

    Despite Clinton: O'Malley in Iowa amid 2016 talk

    Martin O'Malley's latest foray into Iowa begins, appropriately, in a place called Clinton.

    Miami Herald

    Join the
    Discussion

    The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

    The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

    Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

    Hide Comments

    This affects comments on all stories.

    Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category