D.C. SCANDALS

D.C. scandals need to be put in perspective

 

ruthmarcus@washpost.com

Folks, deep breath time. This is not the end of the Obama presidency. It’s a bad stretch with an unfortunate confluence of unfortunate events. None of which will make the first paragraph — not even the first page — of the account of the Obama administration in the history books.

Let’s tick through the trifecta of scandals and what they tell us — about the foibles of this administration, about the hidden operations of bureaucracies, about the modern practice of politics.

•  Benghazi. With the email chain released, the chief takeaway should be this administration’s remarkable capacity to be its own worst enemy. It has managed to look as if it were executing a cover-up without having anything to cover up. The real scandal of Benghazi remains what previous inquiries concluded — that there were “systemic failures” of leadership resulting in “grossly inadequate” security.

The emails depict the White House playing the entirely appropriate role of mediating a bureaucratic squabble between the CIA and State Department, with the CIA focused on quickly delivering to Congress detailed talking points that emphasized its prior security warnings, and State similarly determined not to take the political fall.

The White House comes off looking rather responsible, which is why it is so puzzling that it has clung so fixedly to a story so demonstrably wrong: that its sole involvement with the infamous talking points was to correct a single word. In this case, the cover-up is worse than the non-crime.

•  Internal Revenue Service. With the Treasury Department Inspector General’s report released, the chief takeaway should be the bureaucracy’s remarkable capacity for incompetence and stupidity. “My question is, who’s going to jail over this scandal?” House Speaker John Boehner thundered Wednesday. Mr. Speaker, I hate to disappoint you, but no one. Unless we’ve criminalized idiocy, in which case, better start building more prisons.

As I’ve written earlier, there is no excuse for the IRS actions — either targeting conservative groups for special review or misleading Congress about doing so. The president was right, if about 72 hours late, in demanding the resignation of the acting director.

But the IG report offers evidence that this episode is more reflective of an ignorant, recalcitrant and mismanaged bureaucracy than of a sinister political thumb on the tax scales. The IG describes how the low-level workers determining whether the tea party and other groups deserved nonprofit status “did not consider the public perception of using politically sensitive criteria” and noted the employees’ “lack of knowledge” about what political activities were permitted under the tax law.

Likewise, it cited “insufficient oversight,” with only the lowest-level managers having “approved references to the tea party in the BOLO listing criteria before it was implemented.” BOLO means Be On the Look Out.

• Associated Press leak probe. This one hits close to home.

While the Justice Department insists that it subpoenaed the phone records only after exhausting other avenues of investigation, the net it cast — records from more than 20 phone lines used by about 100 journalists -- remains incomprehensibly, chillingly broad. How nice for the president to now renew his call for a reporter’s shield law, having previously worked to water down the proposal. Talk about the cow and the barn.

That said, the leak uproar also illustrates the damned-if-you-do nature of modern politics.

The critique of President Obama as passive bystander ignores the far more intense — and more justified — critique that would ensue if the White House had intervened in the leak investigation.

Consider: First, the White House is assailed for allegedly condoning or even orchestrating leaks. Had it not conducted a leak investigation, it would have been accused of a cover-up.

Second, having launched a leak investigation, the absolute last thing the White House should do is micro-manage it — indeed, manage it at all.

Every White House has strict rules about contacts with the Justice Department about ongoing criminal investigations for precisely the reason that the political people need to stay away from meddling, or appearing to meddle, in criminal probes.

Only in Washington could the administration be guilty of both not taking leaks seriously enough and taking them too seriously.

Bad things happen in second-term presidencies, often in clumps. This is no coincidence; first-term chickens come home to roost in a second. The inevitable arrogance bred by winning re-election never helps. But this bad run demands perspective. Compared to Katrina, Monica Lewinsky or Iran-contra, these are distractions, highly unfortunate but by no means disastrous.

(c) 2013, Washington Post Writers Group

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  • SYRIA

    Turning our backs on atrocities

    For every dissident and defector I’ve encountered, there is a moment when observation begins to feel like complicity — when remaining a bystander involves culpability.

  •  
MCT

    MIDTERM ELECTIONS

    Time for voters to come to their senses

    The boys and girls of Congress are returning from summer camp — er, Capitol Hill — to their real homes where they will 1) raise money and plead to be returned to camp; 2) stress how much they hate the nation’s political polarization; and 3) pledge never to compromise their beliefs.

  • CONGRESS

    Senators earn an ‘A’ for sexual assault bill

    Sen. Marco Rubio doesn’t have much time for Democrats. But he does have two daughters. And so it was that Wednesday morning, he found himself standing in solidarity with a bipartisan group of senators that included Democrats Kirsten Gillibrand and Claire McCaskill as they announced legislation to curb the scourge of sexual assault on U.S. campuses.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category