The readers’ forum

Coalition made redistricting map more fair

 

In his May 2 story, Group sought to protect Wasserman Schultz’s congressional seat, emails show, Marc Caputo suggests that the FairDistricts Coalition engaged in partisanship when suggesting an alternative to the Legislature’s 2012 Congressional map. But the Legislature itself engaged in intentional partisanship, thus making its map unconstitutional.

The article parrots spurious allegations by attorneys trying to defend the Legislature’s unconstitutional map. Those allegations are based solely on statements from emails that were taken out of context and, in some cases, actually altered by the attorneys retained by the state.

In 2010, voters adopted new standards for redistricting in which legislators cannot draw districts to favor themselves or a political party.

In 2012, feigning compliance, legislators largely ignored the new redistricting standards. Even though Florida is an equally divided state, legislators designed districts to favor incumbents and guarantee the continued dominance of their political party.

The FairDistricts Coalition sued to force compliance with the Constitution. To prove the Legislature purposely drew an imbalanced map, the Coalition presented an alternative map that adhered to the FairDistricts guidelines and better reflected the state’s true partisan breakdown.

While the Legislature’s maps gave Republicans a 2-1 advantage, the Coalition maps gave Republicans a slender majority — closer to how Floridians actually vote. The Legislature claims that this somehow proves the Coalition is guilty of “partisanship.”

This claim is just absurd. The fact that the Coalition drew a map that reflects the state’s partisan breakdown in order to fix the Legislature’s distorted and illegal map is not being “partisan,” it’s following the law. You can’t fix something that’s out of balance without balancing it.

Although the Legislature refuses to produce a single document relating to its backroom map drawing, the Coalition has provided the Legislature with over 59,000 pages showing how its map was drawn. But the article follows the lead of the Legislature’s lawyers and is built on parts of two emails taken out of context.

Both emails were from lawyers simply advising map drawers how to draw districts — in one case, to keep condominium developments from being divided into multiple districts and in another, to admonish a map drawer to draw districts that were compliant with the new constitutional standards. The full emails, and full context, were left out of Caputo’s article.

Ultimately, the Coalition simply tried to repair the Legislature’s improper map. That’s not being “partisan,” that’s being fair.

Dan Gelber, attorney representing the plaintiffs in the legislative redistricting lawsuits, Miami

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    Fare hike for Special Transportation Services is fair

    In the July 20 letter to the editor Fare increase for disabled ‘un-American,’ Evan Flugman expressed concerns over the recommended 50-cent Special Transportation Service (STS) fare increase that is included in the proposed Miami-Dade County budget for fiscal year 2014-2015.

  • How to pick qualified jurists

    As a lawyer who has been practicing in Miami-Dade for 40 years, and appearing regularly before the area’s judges, I would agree with the major theme of Joe Cardona’s July 26 column, Better ways to pick judges. Elections aren’t the best path to a quality bench, yet I strongly disagree that elections haven’t produced a strong local judiciary. The anonymous opinions of lawyers expressed in bar polls is that the overwhelming majority of our local judges do a good job. Applicants to the Judicial Nominating Commission almost always have quality résumés. The pay for judges, while not generous, may be far less than successful experienced lawyers, but compares favorably with the average income as statistics reflect. Judicial elections have not prevented Miami-Dade from providing us an overwhelming number of capable jurists.

  • Where’s the outrage?

    If most of the Muslims of the world are decent, peace-loving citizens, then where is their outrage against the Taliban, Al Qaeda and the other violent murderous Islamics? They kill schoolgirls for the crime of seeking an education, or throw acid in their faces, they set off bombs in crowds of civilians, and they bomb mosques and churches. In Mali, where the situation was horrible, European forces are trying to restore peace.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category