The Oppenheimer Report

Andres Oppenheimer: U.S., Europe take new step to crack down on ‘tax havens’

 

While many of us were focused on the Boston bombings, Venezuela’s dubious elections and North Korea’s war noises in recent weeks, the world’s biggest nations took a potentially historic step — they launched a system to detect secret offshore bank accounts.

At an April 19 meeting in Washington, D.C., the G-20 group of nations, the club of the world’s largest economies, announced an agreement to start an “automatic exchange” of information on bank accounts of people who may be evading taxes or trying to hide dirty money abroad.

At the same time, the G-20 agreed to put new pressure on tax havens to lift their bank secrecy laws. The G-20 cited 14 nations, including Switzerland, Panama, Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago, as countries that don’t meet international standards of tax information exchange.

Some money laundering experts say that the G-20 agreement could also help prevent government corruption scandals, such as the recent reports that Argentina’s late President Nestor Kirchner’s aides may have deposited more than $65 million in foreign tax havens.

“There are a lot of corrupt politicians around the world who are nervous about the discovery of their hidden accounts, and they have reason to be concerned,” says Charles Intriago, head of the Association of Certified Financial Crime Specialists. “This may be the beginning of the end of bank secrecy havens.”

According to Intriago, the G-20 agreement has a good chance of succeeding because the United States and European governments, which make up the core of the G-20, are financially strapped and desperately need to increase their tax collections.

That means they will likely go after their tax evaders with unprecedented zeal, he says.

The G-20 deal, prompted by an ongoing campaign against tax havens by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, came only six days after France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom announced they would sign an agreement to identify tax evasion within and outside their borders.

The European agreement, in turn, follows the steps of a 2010 U.S. law — the Foreign Accounts Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) — that requires foreign banks to report accounts of U.S. residents starting on Jan. 1, 2014.

U.S. officials say that, for the time being, Washington will only exchange information with countries with which it has signed treaties to that effect, such as Mexico. It will not exchange tax data with countries such as Argentina or Venezuela that either have not signed tax treaties with Washington, or that are known to use tax information for political motives.

According to the Tax Justice Network, a British-based non-government group, there is more than $9.4 trillion deposited in tax havens around the world, including $1.1 trillion from wealthy Chinese, $520 billion from Brazilians, $417 billion from Mexicans, $406 billion from Venezuelans and $399 billion from Argentines.

In some cases, such as Venezuela’s, deposits in tax havens exceed the country’s gross domestic product.

Asked about the G-20 agreement, Moisés Cohen, a Panamanian banker and former head of Panama’s Bankers Association, told me that Panama is not a tax haven, because tax havens by definition do not tax deposits. Panama does.

And Panama is taking concrete steps that will soon get it off the list of countries that don’t meet international standards of tax information exchanges, he added.

Other bankers caution that, while the G-20 moves may help trace the funds of tax evaders and corrupt politicians, the proposed global cooperation could hurt legitimate business people who deposit their savings abroad to protect themselves against repressive governments or economic instability.

It’s hard to blame Argentines for putting their money in offshore accounts, when their bank deposits were seized by the government in 2001. And it’s hard to blame Venezuelans for sending their money abroad when the government is selectively punishing the opposition and confiscating companies at its whim, they say.

My opinion: The G-20 agreement is a step forward, but it’s mostly a statement of good intentions. I read some parts of it, and it has more holes than a Swiss cheese (no pun intended).

It says the G-20 countries will urge countries to automatically exchange tax information with their treaty partners “as appropriate” and “taking into account country-specific characteristics.” That leaves a lot of room for maneuvering.

Still, the G-20 move starts a new process that will eventually make it harder for people to hide money offshore. It’s an issue that is not making headlines, but should.

It deserves a much greater public discussion, both to ensure the protection of legitimate depositors who live in unstable countries and to advance the fight against tax evaders and corrupt politicians who hide their money abroad.

Read more Andres Oppenheimer stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
Argentine vice president Amado Boudou, right, shakes hands with China's president Xi Jinping during his visit to the Argentine Congress in Buenos Aires on July 19, 2014.

    In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: China is flexing its muscle in Latin America

    On his visit to Latin America, Chinese President Xi Jinping promised new trade and investment deals that he said will lift China’s booming economic ties with the region to new heights. Many Latin American leaders hailed it as great news amid their countries’ economic slowdowns.

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: BRICS’ emerging world bank: good idea, bad timing

    This week’s announcement by the presidents of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — the so-called BRICS countries — that they will create their own international financial institution was greeted with polite skepticism and some criticism in Washington D.C. But on this issue, the BRICS are doing the right thing.

  • In My Opinion

    Andres Oppenheimer: Brazil leader down but not out by World Cup loss

    The conventional wisdom is that Brazil’s humiliating 7-1 defeat to Germany in the World Cup has created an unprecedented climate of gloom that will affect President Dilma Rousseff’s chances to win reelection in October. But the conventional wisdom may be wrong: there are several reasons to believe that she may still win a second term.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category