Sen. Dianne Feinstein defeated on assault weapons, but not done with gun control push

 

McClatchy Newspapers

Sen. Dianne Feinstein had a lot of support in her push to renew a federal ban on assault weapons, including from law enforcement officials, hundreds of mayors and President Barack Obama.

Public opinion polls showed that a majority of Americans, if not an overwhelming one, were on the California Democrat’s side.

But ultimately, what she really needed was 60 votes in the Senate. And despite her earlier success in getting a ban passed and her reputation as a dealmaker, when the vote came down Wednesday, she only got 40.

It was a stinging defeat. Fifteen of her fellow Democrats voted against her and only one Republican, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, voted with her. On top of that, four months after 20 children and six adults were killed by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., the Senate also rejected several other amendments to a broader gun bill, including a carefully crafted bipartisan compromise on background checks.

“It was a very disappointing day to me,” Feinstein said Thursday in a brief interview at the Capitol. “The safety of the American people is really the major issue in all of this. And it’s clear this didn’t help.”

She said she’d continue her fight, but it’s far from certain how she could get from 40 votes to 60.

“It’s abundantly clear that this is going nowhere, at least for now,” said Robert Spitzer, chairman of the political science department at the State University of New York-Cortland and author of “The Politics of Gun Control.”

Some Democrats who voted no said the assault weapons ban wasn’t the answer to reducing violence.

“I get the advocates and what they are looking for, but I think there are better approaches and ways we could address this,” said Sen. Mark Begich of Alaska.

In 1994, the original assault weapons ban was part of a broader crime bill that got 61 votes in a Senate then also controlled by Democrats. Seven Republicans supported it back then, and only two Democrats voted no.

Senate procedures haven’t changed in the past two decades, said Senate historian Donald Ritchie, but Senate politics have. There are fewer centrists and more hardliners. Party-line votes used to be rare, but now they’re routine.

“The parties are more internally cohesive,” he said. “It’s harder to create bipartisan coalitions.”

Getting 60 votes is a lot harder than it used to be, and some favor lowering the threshold on certain votes.

“I had always been a proponent of filibuster reform,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., a leading supporter of stronger gun laws, told reporters Thursday. “I’m now a revolutionary.”

But even if it took only 51 votes, the assault weapons ban still wouldn’t have had enough support. The 15 Democrats who voted against Feinstein’s amendment Wednesday largely come from rural states with strong support for gun rights.

Some, including Begich, Arkansas’ Mark Pryor, Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu, North Carolina’s Kay Hagan and Virginia’s Mark Warner, are up for re-election next year.

So is Montana’s Max Baucus, who voted for the 1994 crime bill that contained the original assault weapons ban. On Wednesday, he voted no on Feinstein’s amendment.

The defeat of all six Democrats would be enough to hand control of the Senate over to Republicans, and they were being watched carefully by the National Rifle Association and its allies this week on their gun votes.

But groups that favor gun restrictions have begun raising their own campaign funds – though it could take years to elect senators who are more favorably disposed to an assault weapons ban, and to defeat those who aren’t.

“If someone is willing to meet them toe to toe, it could change the dynamic,” Spitzer said of the NRA.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has pledged millions of dollars to support pro-gun control candidates. Retired astronaut Mark Kelly, whose wife, former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, was shot while meeting her with constituents in Tucson, Ariz., has pledged to defeat those who voted against the background check amendment. That includes Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., whom both Kelly and Giffords consider a friend.

“They have a pretty powerful campaign message they can make just on background checks,” Spitzer said. “They have a real issue they can hammer people with.”

Although Flake isn’t up for re-election until 2018, there are two elections until then in which gun-control groups could have an impact. Close to 90 percent of Americans favor stronger background checks, and if fear of elections compelled some senators to vote down gun legislation this time, in the future, it could compel a different response.

“Time will make that clear,” Feinstein said. “We need to wait. We need to see what happens.”

Sean Cockerham of the Washington Bureau contributed.

Email: ctate@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @tatecurtis

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
A portrait of North Korean leader Kim Jung Un posing with a North Korean gold medalist in Judo, An Kum Ae, decorates the walls of a local gymnasium, Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2014 in Pyongyang, North Korea. In just over a week, North Korea will send its top athletes to win gold for their leader in what could well be the biggest sporting event of their lives and a major propaganda campaign for their nation, the Asian Games in Incheon, South Korea.

    North Korea athletes on mission for political gold

    It's a hot, sunny morning at the newly refurbished Sosan Football Stadium in Pyongyang. Two women's soccer teams head to the sidelines of the artificial turf, leaving only a row of archers to continue their practice before several senior sports ministry officials. So sure are they of their aim — or, perhaps, so impromptu is the decision to have them shoot here — that there are no barriers behind the targets, posted on simple squares of straw.

  • 6 candidates in running for equestrian presidency

    Six candidates — all from Europe — are in the running to replace Princess Haya of Jordan as president of the International Equestrian Federation.

  •  
FILE - This Aug. 12, 2014 file photo shows a healthcare worker walking near a Ebola isolation unit wearing protective gear against the virus at Kenema Government Hospital in Kenema, Sierra Leone. Federal researchers next week will start testing humans with an experimental vaccine to prevent the deadly Ebola virus. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced Thursday that it is launching the safety trial on a vaccine developed by the agency’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and GlaxoSmithKline. They will test 20 healthy adult volunteers to see if the virus is safe and triggers an adequate response in their immune systems.

    Ivory Coast will allow Sierra Leone team in

    The Ivory Coast government decided late Monday to allow Sierra Leone's team to enter the country, giving the go-ahead for an African Cup qualifier after fears over Ebola put the game and Ivory Coast's place in the tournament in doubt.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category