Before bombings, feds questioned Massachusetts security plan

 

McClatchy Newspapers

A February report by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General is sure to raise questions in the weeks ahead about how Massachusetts spent federal grant money to protect the state and better evaluate terror threats.

The state was revamping its security plans with federal authorities when this week’s deadly blasts hit.

There’s no initial evidence that the shortcomings listed in the 50-page report played a role in Monday’s deadly blasts in Boston. But the February document raised troubling concerns about the lack of performance measures adopted in Massachusetts and about insufficient federal guidance.

The inspector general’s office declined to comment on the report Tuesday, other than to note that the state had until May 28 to present a corrective action plan.

The office examined how Massachusetts spent roughly $122 million in federal grant money between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2011. In most instances, said the report, Massachusetts distributed and spent the money as required by law.

“However, the Commonwealth needs to update and improve its Homeland Security Strategies, develop a performance measurement system to assess preparedness, obligate grant funds within required time limits and strengthen onsite monitoring of subgrantees,” the inspector general’s report said, noting that the state exceeded management and administrative costs by more than $4 million.

That question of preparedness is likely to be examined in great detail by both federal and state officials once more is known about who planted the two bombs near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, why they did so and how. As of late Tuesday afternoon, authorities had announced no suspects nor said whether their investigation indicated a domestic or an international terror link.

The February report offered 11 specific recommendations to the state, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency concurred with eight of the suggestions, taking issue with just three of the DHS recommendations, involving the recovery of federal funds. Massachusetts responded initially that it lacked sufficient guidance from federal agencies, particularly FEMA.

One of the most charged complaints involved insufficient performance measures adopted by both the state’s Executive Office of Public Safety and Security and Boston officials administering grant funds under the Urban Areas Security Initiative. The report said that the state and Boston lacked “sufficient performance measures to use in determining their ability to deter, prevent, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism and natural and manmade disasters.” It also said that “FEMA has not provided clear guidance” to states about developing their own performance measures.

In response to questions from McClatchy, Terrel Harris, a spokesman for the state security and safety office, said the state was in the midst of making changes when the attacks happened Monday.

“Massachusetts recognized the need to revise our State Homeland Security Strategy in early 2012 and have been engaged in a process that will lead to an updated strategy. However, we made a decision to hold off updating the State Strategy until we received the new federal guidance,” Harris said in an email.

“This included FEMA’s emerging strategic vision and new Threat Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) requirement. We believed that the THIRA should be the foundation of our updated Strategy. (Massachusetts), therefore, conducted a comprehensive assessment for its Threat Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA). This was submitted to FEMA in Jan 2013 and it will be used as the basis for our updated State Strategy.”

The state’s procurement policies also were faulted in the inspector general’s report. It cited eight instances where federal or state procurement policies were skirted, including the purchase of 16 all-terrain vehicles for more than $100,000 without a competitive bid. And in an area that might soon be scrutinized, an Urban Areas grant was used to contract intelligence analyst support, but the contract included neither a scope of work nor costs for these services, the report charged. These were only added a year after the contract was signed, the inspector general’s office said.

In a Jan. 16 response to a draft of the report, the top safety official in Massachusetts acknowledged that some recommendations would be implemented but added that the federal government shares blame.

“It is our hope that by conducting this and other state audits, the DHS (Office of Inspector General) gains an in-depth understanding of the realities of implementing this highly regulated and complex grant program, which differs from many other federal grant programs in that it entails initiating entirely new operating methodologies and programs; buying, installing and effectively utilizing sophisticated equipment and infrastructure; and continuously coordinating with a wide range of stakeholders to achieve myriad programmatic outcomes,” wrote Ellen Frank, executive director of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security.

State officials agreed that a more detailed performance evaluation plan was preferable but countered that Massachusetts had adopted 33 specific implementation steps and was achieving progress.

The office of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., did not respond to a request for comment. Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., who sits on the House Subcommittee on National Security, also had no immediate comment.

Email: khall@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @KevinGHall

Read more Politics Wires stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
This photo taken Dec. 21, 2012 photo Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Cal., chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, speaking at a Capitol Hill news conference in Washington. Sunday in Washington, Aug. 31, 2014, Feinstein said President Barack Obama may be "too cautious" in his approach to dealing with Islamic State militants. Speaking on NBC's "Meet the Press" she said that the Defense and State departments have been putting together a response to the threat, and has seen nothing to compare to the viciousness of the militants who have overrun large portions of Iraq, killed civilians and beheaded American journalist James Foley. Feinstein says the Islamic State group has financing, military structure and weapons unlike any other militants and called them "extraordinarily dangerous."

    Lawmakers: Islamic State groups wants to hit US

    Cities in the United States and Western Europe are being eyed as Islamic State militants' future targets and President Barack Obama needs to take action, U.S. lawmakers say.

  •  
FILE - In this Sept. 6, 2010 file photo, President Barack Obama greets supporters before speaking on the economy at the Milwaukee Laborfest in Henry Maier Festival Park in Milwaukee. The last time President Barack Obama came to Wisconsin to celebrate workers' rights on Labor Day, there was barely a hint of the turmoil that was to come just months later as public employees fought unsuccessfully to retain their ability to collectively bargain. Now, four years later, as the architect of the law that stripped unions of that power faces re-election, Obama is coming back to Milwaukee for an event also featuring Gov. Scott Walker's Democratic challenger Mary Burke.

    Obama promoting economic gains as elections near

    Boosted by recent economic gains, President Barack Obama is sounding more bullish about the nation's recovery from the Great Recession and the White House is encouraging Democrats to show similar optimism as they head into the November mid-term elections.

  •  
This June 18, 2014 file photo shows Iowa Democratic Senate candidate, Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, on Capitol Hill in Washington. The first midterm elections since both parties embraced a historic change in campaign finance, and with it a sea of campaign cash, will mean for most voters an avalanche of television ads trying to reach the few able to be swayed and willing to vote. In the nation's closest races for U.S. Senate, that translates into "price per vote" that could easily double what was spent in the 2012 presidential election.

    Brace yourselves: Campaign cash buying tons of ads

    Iowa's airwaves are already jammed with political ads, most of them negative, in one of the Senate races nationwide that will decide which party claims the majority.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category