In My Opinion

Five scenarios for Venezuela — most of them bad

Most polls show that Venezuela’s government candidate Nicolás Maduro is likely to win Sunday’s elections thanks to an unfair election process in which the government controls an overwhelming share of TV time, but — even if he wins — Maduro’s future is gloomy.

If most polls are right and Maduro wins despite a significant narrowing of his advantage over opposition candidate Henrique Capriles in recent days, a lot will depend on his margin of victory, and on whether Capriles concedes as readily as he and other opposition leaders have done in the past. It may not happen quite that way this time.

Judging from what I’m told by well-placed Venezuelans, there are five major scenarios of what may happen after Sunday’s vote to elect late President Hugo Chávez’s successor. Here they are, in no particular order:

First scenario: A clear Maduro victory by more than 10 percentage points, and six years of rule by Chávez’s designated heir.

Maduro’s conclusive victory leaves Capriles with no option but to concede, and the defeated candidate’s complaints about a tainted election process — in which the government not only controlled most of the media, but also bought votes and intimidated opposition voters — sound like sour grapes.

Globovision, the last anti-Chávez television network, is silenced after its recent sale to government cronies. Venezuela becomes an elected dictatorship, with no opposition media.

Second scenario: A clear Maduro victory, followed by chaos down the road.

Maduro wins by 10 percent or more, but his government implodes over the next two years because of a combination of Venezuela’s skyrocketing inflation, which is the highest in Latin America, its inability to keep state subsidies amid stagnant oil prices, and internal divisions within the Chavista corruptocracy.

There are riots on the streets, and the military refuses to fire on protesters despite current Defense Minister Diego Molero’s recent statement that Venezuela’s National Bolivarian Armed Forces are “anti-imperialist, socialist and Chavistas.”

Government-backed para-military groups attack protesters, drawing an international outcry and forcing the government to call early elections.

Third scenario: A not-so-clear Maduro victory, followed by a temporary calm before the storm. Maduro wins by 5 percent of the vote, and Capriles remains silent or stops short of conceding.

Cuba, which micro-manages Maduro’s government and wants stability in Venezuela at all costs to preserve Venezuela’s oil subsidies, recommends Maduro to resume talks with the U.S. State Department to normalize relations.

But as Venezuela’s economy collapses, Maduro needs a scapegoat, and resurrects his conspiracy theories that the U.S. government inoculated Chávez with cancer, and that former U.S. diplomats are trying to kill him. Venezuela enters a period of instability, followed by chaos, and within two years Maduro has to call for early elections.

Fourth scenario: A questionable Maduro victory by 2 percent, which Capriles immediately denounces as fraudulent.

Maduro, who doesn’t have Chávez’s wits nor folksy personality, declares victory on Sunday, but the election results are much closer than expected. Opposition students take to the streets to defend what they see as a stolen election.

The fact that the government did not allow the Organization of American States or European Union electoral observers — only sympathetic UNASUR visitors — casts further doubts about the election results.

The Maduro government cracks down on protesters, but the scenes of violence start a process of gradual loss of legitimacy of the Maduro government at home and abroad, which accelerates the regime’s implosion.

Fifth scenario: Capriles wins by more than 3 percentage points, and the Maduro government has little choice but to concede. Much like happened in Nicaragua’s 1990 elections, when the opposition defeated the Sandinista regime despite the government’s huge advantage in the polls, a victorious Capriles takes office.

But faced with a pro-Chávez Congress, and virtually all other government institutions dominated by Chavistas, Capriles has to form a de-facto coalition government. In addition, he has to take unpopular austerity measures, for which he will need some degree of Chavista support.

My opinion: I wouldn’t be surprised if we see the third or fourth scenario in Venezuela — a clear Maduro victory with a period of calm before the storm, or a not-so-clear Maduro victory that will mark the beginning of the end of the Chávez-era populist fiesta.

Either way, if he wins, Maduro faces a grim future. He will inherit a crumbling economy, courtesy of a Chávez legacy that has left Venezuela more oil-dependent, less industrialized and more poorly educated than ever despite having benefitted from the biggest oil export bonanza in recent memory.

Read more Andres Oppenheimer stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category