How GOP once championed federal income tax

The government has the right to “demand” 99 percent of a man’s property when the nation needs it.

That was the argument made by a Republican congressman in 1862 to introduce a novel idea: the federal income tax.

The Civil War was then costing the Treasury $2 million a day. To pay for uniforms, guns, food, mules, wagons, bounties and burials, Congress had issued hundreds of millions of dollars of bonds and paper money. But Republicans had a horror of debt and the runaway inflation that paper currency usually caused.

Taxes were the obvious answer. A conservative Republican newspaper declared, “There is not the slightest objection raised in any loyal quarter to as much taxation as may be necessary.”

Until then, taxes in the U.S. had always been apportioned by state according to population, and were generally levied on land holdings. But when it came to the huge sums necessary to fight the Civil War, such direct taxes would ruin farmers.

Instead, Republicans turned to what they called “indirect taxes,” which were essentially sales taxes of 3 percent on all manufactured goods. These, however, wouldn’t be sufficient to raise the needed revenue without making basic necessities prohibitively expensive for most Americans.

So what could Congress do to ensure, as Sen. William Fessenden, R-Maine put it, that tax burdens would “be more equalized on all classes of the community, more especially on those who are able to bear them?”

The answer was a federal tax on incomes.

“It would be manifestly unjust to allow the large money operators and wealthy merchants, whose incomes might reach hundreds of thousands of dollars, to escape from their due proportion of the burden,” said Thaddeus Stevens, a House Republican leader and wealthy iron manufacturer.

The staunchly Republican Chicago Tribune agreed: “The rich should be taxed more than the poor.”

After experimenting with a 3 percent tax on incomes of more than $800 in the summer of 1861, Congress expanded the income tax in 1862. It placed a tax of 3 percent on incomes exceeding $600 and of 5 percent on those of more than $10,000.

“The weight must be distributed equally,” Rep. Justin Morrill, R-Vt., explained, “not upon each man an equal amount, but a tax proportionate to his ability to pay.” There was little debate.

Republican congressmen not only imposed an income tax but also shifted tax collection from the states to the federal government. A new national system would be cheaper to institute than a variety of state systems, the measure’s Republican sponsor argued. There was an additional benefit: If Americans paid taxes to the national government, they would have a personal stake in its survival and stability. In 1862, Republicans created the Internal Revenue Bureau in the Treasury Department, the precursor to the Internal Revenue Service.

The new system worked so well that it was expanded after two years. As the national debt climbed toward $1.5 billion, Americans clamored for Congress to raise money. “What do the people of the United States ask of this Congress?” demanded a New Hampshire Republican. “To take off taxes? No, sir, they ask you to put them on. The universal cry of this people is to be taxed.”

Congress obliged. In 1864, taxes on manufactured goods rose to 5 percent. Rates increased to 5 percent for incomes from $600 to $5,000; 7.5 percent for incomes from $5,000 to $10,000; and 10 percent for those of more than $10,000. Days after President Abraham Lincoln signed the new law, Congress passed a joint resolution imposing a 5 percent surtax on all three brackets.

Civil War income taxes expired in 1875. They were no longer necessary because the government had an alternative source of revenue. During the war, Republicans had raised tariff rates to about half a product’s value, arguing that if manufacturing was going to be taxed, industry had to be protected from foreign competition. Tariffs brought the Treasury more money than it spent every year from 1875 to 1893.

A national depression began in 1893, under a Democratic Congress. In 1894, Democrats tried to combat the economic turmoil by lowering tariff rates. Then, to make up for lost revenue, they enacted a tax on incomes of more than $4,000.

But Republicans had changed in the years since the Civil War. Where the party previously had worried about protecting equality, its Gilded Age members worried about protecting property. Although Civil War Republicans had invented the federal income tax, their Gilded Age counterparts assailed the levy as “communism.” And while Civil War Republicans celebrated an income tax that would rally Americans behind the government, those of the Gilded Age insisted that it was unconstitutional and that taxing power belonged to the states.

In 1895, the pro-business Supreme Court declared the income tax unconstitutional. Congress could only impose direct taxes, it said, meaning levies that would fall on farmers rather than manufacturers, on poor southerners and westerners rather than wealthy easterners. Four justices dissented, pointing out that the majority decision overturned 100 years of precedent, including the Civil War legislation.

The court, one justice lamented, had ignored the great principle that “in the imposition of taxes for the benefit of the government, the burdens thereof should be imposed upon those having most ability to bear them.”

Heather Cox Richardson is a professor of history at Boston College and the president of the Historical Society.

© 2013, Bloomberg News

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • Don’t let Jeb Bush’s moderation confuse you

    Jeb Bush’s recent compassionate comments on immigration show how far apart he is from the far right of the Republican Party.

  • The vibrancy of today’s American literature

    Sales at American book stores rose a measly 1 percent in 2013, according to trade accounts. It remains unclear whether that sluggishness — sales of ebooks have also tapered off — truly represents a further chipping away of the importance of books in our culture.

  • Kansas, the KKK and hate without end

    The news that a former grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan is suspected of shooting and killing three people near Jewish community centers in Kansas seems at first glance like a disparaged past flaring briefly into the present. Americans like to imagine that the KKK belongs to a long-gone South and anti-Semitism to a distant 20th century. Sadly, this better reflects a naive faith in the nation’s history of religious tolerance than the realities experienced by many religious minorities. Although the KKK has evolved and its membership has dwindled, it remains part of an American legacy of religious intolerance.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category