The Home Economist

Binge drinking and joblessness


Know your risks

 Worried about your drinking? The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism sets these guidelines for what’s considered low and high risk consumption.

Moderate or ‘low-risk’ drinking

For men: No more than 4 drinks on any single day AND no more than 14 drinks per week

For women: No more than 3 drinks on any single day AND no more than 7 drinks per week

To stay low risk, you must keep within both the single-day and weekly limits. Research shows that people who drink moderately may be less likely to experience an alcohol use disorder. (Even within these limits, you can have problems if you drink too quickly, have other health issues, drive, operate machinery or are pregnant.)

Heavy or ‘at-risk’ drinking

For healthy adults in general, heavy drinking means consuming more than the single-day or the weekly amounts listed above. About 1 in 4 people who drink above these levels already has alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse problems.

Binge drinking

Binge drinking means drinking so much within about 2 hours that blood alcohol concentration levels reach 0.08g/dL. For women, this usually occurs after about four drinks, and for men, after about five. Drinking this way can pose health and safety risks, including car crashes and injuries. Over the long term, binge drinking can damage the liver and other organs.

Hed here

 Excessive drinking is expensive — mostly thanks to costs for health care, damaged property and lost productivity. But you know what? Alcohol isn’t cheap either and prices have been rising right through the recession. Here are the price increases across the country for the past decade.

City Price increase for alcoholic beverages

Atlanta 10 percent
Los Angeles10 percent
Detroit11 percent
Washington DC-Baltimore16 percent
Cleveland 17 percent
Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton17 percent
Kansas City 18 percent
Milwaukee19 percent
Denver-Boulder 19 percent
St. Louis MO20 percent
Miami-Fort Lauderdale21 percent
Tampa 21 percent
New York-New Jersey23 percent
Chicago-Gary IN23 percent
Houston24 percent
Pittsburgh25 percent
Portland-Salem25 percent
San Diego 25 percent
San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose25 percent
Philadelphia-Atlantic City26 percent
Phoenix-Mesa26 percent
Boston28 percent
Cincinnati Hamilton30 percent
Honolulu31 percent
Dallas37 percent
St. Paul-Minneapolis 57.3 percent
AnchorageDOWN 10 percent
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

South Miami Recovery — an outpatient treatment center for substance abuse — has seen an increase in patients who say their alcohol consumption has become a problem since the start of the recession, according to the center’s director Howard Lerner. Based on his conversations with treatment-seekers, it seems the construction industry collapse around here demolished not only incomes for real estate professionals but also for people working in the law, accounting and appraisal jobs that, it turns out, weren’t protected. Many of those with economic anxiety found too much comfort in what Lerner calls the oldest drug known to man: the ethanol in alcohol that slows the human heart and creates a euphoric feeling.

“The people who have problems use alcohol as they would a medication,” says Lerner, who’s also a certified addiction professional. “The stress of the economy has played on substance abuse.”

New research from the University of Miami proves his point quite well. It shows higher unemployment in a community does indeed produce more problematic drinking. We’re talking about the kind of consumption that’s expensive — costing lots of cash — for drinkers, their families and their communities. And despite the recent Labor Department report claiming the job market is currently creating opportunities, economists looking deep into the statistics warn there’s a big downside to that story — and it focuses a group of unpaid and dejected people who are no longer even counted.

“Episodes of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and dependence, driving after drinking too much and just getting drunk all increase when unemployment rate goes up,” says Michael T. French, a professor of health economics at the University of Miami. “They are the hidden costs of a recession.”

The very idea debunks piles of earlier papers claiming that sick economies — which bring fewer professional obligations and high liquor prices — actually keep people healthy.

“It just didn’t make sense,” says French, who in turn got hold of the National Epidemiological Study, which provides answers about the physical and mental health of the same people on two separate occasions, five years apart. He merged those answers with state unemployment rates and discovered with increased joblessness came an increasing number of people reporting problematic drinking. To be clear, that’s not alcoholism — the abuse we associate with wine in morning coffee mugs — but simply intoxication that’s frequent, related to binging, driving, crime or even your everyday, poor decision-making.

“Alcohol is a leisure time activity for many people,” French says. “If you’re laid off, you have more leisure time.”

The economic costs for that kind of drinking ring to the tune of $223.5 billion a year, says Gregory Bloss, a policy analyst at the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Heavy drinkers and their families bear 41.5 percent of those expenses, he says.

There’s decreased productivity — even looking for a job requires the kind of self-determination that puts you behind a computer and a phone — medical costs, car crashes, crime, fires, health care costs, special education for babies born with fetal alcohol syndrome and premature death.

“Assigning a dollar value to something like the loss of a teenager is troubling,” Bloss says. “We use future earnings but if you think about your own child, there is no number. So the dollar amounts are a conservative approach.”

What’s more, males with a history of alcoholism earn less money than their peers who are similar in every other way, Bloss says. And for both genders, heavy drinking reduces labor force participation by 2.5 percent, he says.

Thing is, labor market participation — meaning the number of people who are either working or looking for work (as opposed to, say, stay-home mothers) has been declining during this recession, says Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute in Washington. So while the government’s recent unemployment report — that’s the percent of the population actively looking for a job — showed lower levels of joblessness in 22 states, it’s in part because so many people just stopped looking.

“There are a million stories about why people drop out — some might have gone back to work after having a baby, others are discouraged,” she says. “But the unemployment rate is understating how weak job opportunities are today.”

This is one of an occasional series of columns by Miamian Brett Graff, a former U.S. government economist who writes about how economic forces are affecting real people.

Read more Personal Finance stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category