Legacy of Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez will be hard to erase

What does Hugo Chávez leave to the Venezuelan people? Three legacies, all of which are poisoned: a harebrained way to govern, the mindless 21st-Century socialism, and a neopopulist model based on welfare-patronage.

• First, he leaves them the memory of a colorful character who was very funny. He governed badly but was amusing and monopolized the newscasts. Fourteen years of surprises, never a boring moment. He sang, played baseball, insulted others, fought with practically everybody and then befriended them again, as happened with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, against whose country he almost declared war but eventually avowed friendship — a feeling that, ended up being mutual.

That’s no way to lead a country. It is a bad example that propagates swiftly. Nicolás Maduro, the heir-designate, is a Chávez apprentice. That eccentric way of appearing in public, what some people call “charisma,” usually generates much attraction among the less-educated Latin American classes but inevitably leads to disaster.

True, seriousness is not always effective at the polls, but shouldn’t be dismissed outright.

• In second place, Hugo Chávez leaves among his cohorts a substitute for an ideological vision. Twenty-first-Century socialism is not an ideology, though Heinz Dieterich, its jolly German-Mexican theoretician, touts it as such. Instead, it is a surrogate composed of three noxious elements: anti-Americanism, anti-market policies and a rejection of private property as a way to generate wealth.

Of those three factors, the key one, the one that binds them, is anti-Americanism. Just as Hitler was convinced that all of humanity’s ills derived from the existence and actions of the Jews, Chávez, heeding Fidel Castro’s guidance, lived and died fully persuaded that the White House was really Satan’s lair.

That’s the only explanation for his barefaced assertion that the earthquake that devastated Port-au-Prince was the result of a secret weapon tested by the Pentagon in Haiti’s capital as a way for American imperialism to seize that country’s wealth. How can anyone say such a stupidity and not be locked in a loony bin?Along with the intrinsic wickedness of the yanquis, there is the intrinsic evil of the private market.

According to Chavismo, prices must be controlled, so that the poor may acquire goods and services. Multinational corporations are evil. Merchants are agents of imperialism. Economic freedom is a farce. Instead, equity resides in the good will of a legion of benevolent functionaries.

Chávez believed all that and inoculated his supporters with these ideas. To him, a just society was possible only if a group of revolutionaries, led by a strongman enlightened by Providence or Simón Bolívar, which is the same, dictates the what, how and when of commercial transactions.

• But, of the three legacies that Chávez left to his executors to manage in a revolutionary manner, the third is the worst: neopopulism. That is, the notion that society should live from the output of the state, not the opposite, as happens in the world’s prosperous countries.

It should be noted that, in the democratic Venezuela before Chavismo, there was a populist substratum fostered by supporters of Democratic Action, a Social Democratic party, and the COPEI, a Christian Democratic party — the traditional political groupings.

Hugo Chávez multiplied one thousandfold their wrong way of distributing public resources.

In his 14-year tenure, while more than 100,000 private companies folded and hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans chose to emigrate, the Bolivarian president created a welfare-patronage system based on granting subsidies and creating “missions” that distribute goods and services, generating a parasitic attitude in millions of people who, naturally, will vote for whoever props them up.

That accursed legacy will be very difficult to eradicate. The Argentines have not been able to do it in more than 60 years.

© Firmas Press

Read more Carlos Alberto Montaner stories from the Miami Herald

Centrist candidate Mauricio Rodas greets supporters after trouncing the government’s official candidate for mayor of Quito, Ecuador, in last month’s elections.


    Eduardo Correa losing popularity in Ecuador

    It happened again. The defeat of Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa in the municipal elections of Feb. 23 is not an isolated case. It is possible that 21st-century socialism, its ideological neighbors and the circuit of countries in the “Bolivarian” circle, known by acronym ALBA, are in a downturn.



    The Doberman in Havana and the White House

    President Obama wants to modify U.S. policy toward Cuba. It is not an important priority, so he won’t put too much effort into it, but he will try to do something if he doesn't find too much resistance on the way.



    Cuba: The selling of a nation

    I first heard the concept from a European diplomat who had lived in Cuba. It has since spread. The model created by the Castro brothers is a pimp state.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category