With an eye toward his 2014 reelection effort, Gov. Rick Scott has tried to portray himself as a pal of teachers and families who rely on public education. He talks often about how he boosted education spending in 2012 and this year proposed giving teachers a $2,500 pay raise.
Not surprisingly, his Democratic foes emphasize different facts and figures about education spending — including how Scott oversaw a spending cut in 2011.
As Scott prepared to deliver his State of the State speech March 5, the Democrats “pre-butted” him with a press release the day before attacking his record on jobs, tax cuts and education.
“Scott, the hardcore tea party conservative who spent $5 million of his own money to defeat the Affordable Care Act and who slashed education funding by $1.3 billion, calling it not a ‘ core function’ of the state, is now arguing for investments in education and the expansion of Medicaid under the president’s healthcare law,” wrote the Florida Democratic Party.
Education sounds like a fairly basic government service or a “core function.” Did Scott call education not a “core function” of the state?
Scott and the word ‘core’
To support their claim, Democrats pointed to a February 2011 article in Jacksonville’s Florida Times-Union about Scott’s first budget proposal, which called for steep cuts to much of the budget, including education, benefits for state workers, and state jobs.
The article quoted Scott at a Tallahassee press conference: “The public expects us to get back to what the core functions of the state are, not things that would be nice but we don’t have the money for.”
Florida Democratic Party spokesman Eric Conrad told PolitiFact Florida that Scott was talking about returning to the “core functions” of the state while also broadly cutting education.
“It’s kind of hard to think he considers education to be a core function if he was cutting that much money from it,” Conrad said.
But we found no place where Scott specifically mentioned education and said it was not a “core function” of government. Instead, Scott talked about the core functions of government in a much more general way, saying only core functions should receive funding.
Here are some excerpts from Scott’s comments on core functions.
While unveiling his proposed budget at a tea party rally in Eustis on Feb. 7, 2011, Scott said, “The fact is that government has to get back to its core functions. But only its core functions.”
Later in the speech, when talking about streamlining state agencies, Scott said: “And, by eliminating programs that are not core government functions, remember we are going to go back to what the core function is, not a lot of ‘it would be nice to have,’ just like, that’s not what you get to do right now, we are going to go back to core functions, it will save us another $150 million over two years.”
Scott did mention education in another part of his speech, saying that he would cut “over $4 billion in taxes over the next two years without any cuts out of state general revenue for education, zero cuts out of state general revenue for education.” Actually, state funding for education shrank that year, as we noted in a 2011 fact-check.