Tear down the J. Edgar Hoover building


The J. Edgar Hoover Building in Washington is a threat to national security. It’s time to tear it down.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s headquarters has been falling apart for years. At this point its decrepitude imperils the bureau’s biggest mission: to prevent another Sept. 11 attack.

If you’ve ever been in Washington, you know the place. You can’t miss it. It’s that pile of concrete defacing Pennsylvania Avenue, halfway between the White House and the Capitol, that looks like a Stalinist parking garage, an architectural crime against humanity. It’s a public disgrace.

The building’s ugliness is a perfect match for its shoddy construction. Rainwater pours into the building, and its thick skin is cracking. Passers-by run the risk of being brained by a falling chunk of FBI facade.

On the inside, things are worse. Never mind that the electrical systems, the air ducts and the elevators need $80 million worth of repairs. The Hoover building fails to meet basic security criteria established for federal buildings three years ago.

These failures are, of course, classified. But they are no secret: The FBI headquarters can’t support its fraying patchwork of computer systems or secure its cubicles from cyberspies.

What’s more, the building is as crowded as a rush-hour subway — and as incompatible to candid conversations among agents. FBI counterterrorism specialists need to be able to speak with FBI intelligence analysts face-to-face, in private. But the Hoover building’s space constraints prevent them from sitting down together in one place.

Instead, they are closed behind an endless series of doors, unable to adequately collaborate. That might have been fine when Hoover ruled as an absolute monarch, hurling commands from on high. It’s a bad business in this day and age, when intelligence and analysis need to flow up the chain of command.

The place already was overflowing on the day its present director, Robert Mueller, took office on Sept. 4, 2001. Back then the FBI had 9,700 people assigned to headquarters. Today it has 17,300. Half of them can’t fit into the building. After Sept. 11, 200,000 square feet of basement, storage and cafeteria space were converted to offices. When that ran out, FBI administrators started renting space in suburban shopping malls and corporate parks. Rent for these remote offices now exceeds $3 million a week.

More than 8,000 FBI headquarters personnel are housed at more than 40 annexes inside and outside Washington. Landlords and tenants in at least nine of these places refuse to operate under the government’s security constraints. So the offices are useless for anything resembling counterterrorism.

On the contrary, if you want to see what a palace built with tax dollars looks like, go to the Central Intelligence Agency’s headquarters complex. (No, they don’t have guided tours; neither does the FBI since al Qaida struck.) The main building, dating from President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s administration, has a gleaming marble lobby and snazzy, Mad Men- style executive suites on the seventh floor. The newer buildings, added under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, are state-of-the-art — good-looking and girded against hackers, from the wires to the windows.

So why does the FBI have to work in a hellhole? It’s no way to run an intelligence service.

Our elected representatives in Congress loathe spending money on things such as diplomatic security. Then they scream when an ambassador is killed for want of armed guards. Though a new base for the FBI would surely cost a billion dollars and take a decade to build, the FBI deserves better, and so do we.

A shovel in the earth would be a fitting way to salute Mueller when he retires in September after 12 years. Yes, his FBI has from time to time erred on the side of excess — but far less often than Hoover’s did. Mueller’s agents blew the whistle on the CIA’s secret prisons. And Mueller himself confronted President George W. Bush in the White House over his unconstitutional eavesdropping on Americans.

Mueller is the first director — ever — who has struck something approaching a proper balance between national security and civil liberties. He has often said what he doesn’t want when he retires is a gold medal and a speech saying: “Congratulations, you won the war on terror — but we lost our civil liberties.”

I’m not saying a new headquarters should be dedicated to Mueller. We all know the pitfalls of the Edifice Complex — just look at the Hoover building. We simply owe the FBI’s agents a decent place to work.

Even as a replacement is constructed, the old place will need some work to make it last through the coming decade. As a tribute to the preservation of civil liberties in a time of continued danger, we could start by scraping Hoover’s name off the facade.

Tim Weiner has won the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award for writing on national security. His most recent book is “Enemies: A History of the FBI.”


© 2013, Bloomberg News

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • The vibrancy of today’s American literature

    Sales at American book stores rose a measly 1 percent in 2013, according to trade accounts. It remains unclear whether that sluggishness — sales of ebooks have also tapered off — truly represents a further chipping away of the importance of books in our culture.

  • Kansas, the KKK and hate without end

    The news that a former grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan is suspected of shooting and killing three people near Jewish community centers in Kansas seems at first glance like a disparaged past flaring briefly into the present. Americans like to imagine that the KKK belongs to a long-gone South and anti-Semitism to a distant 20th century. Sadly, this better reflects a naive faith in the nation’s history of religious tolerance than the realities experienced by many religious minorities. Although the KKK has evolved and its membership has dwindled, it remains part of an American legacy of religious intolerance.

  • Who pays the most on Tax Day?

    Which taxpayers experience the greatest tax burden — and who pays the most in taxes?

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category