From Our Inbox

Minimum wage boost would be economic boon

 

President Obama’s call to raise the minimum wage is a welcome relief.

American workers, not big businesses, have been the biggest losers in a sagging economy and sluggish recovery. Stagnant job growth, coupled with record high employment, has forced many individuals and families to do more with less — including on the wage front.

The president’s proposal would pump more than $18 billion into local economies annually, create much needed tax revenue for cities and states and stabilize families still recovering from the most recent recession.

Across the country, there are 30 million people employed in low-wage jobs that pay less than $9 per hour or $18,000 per year. Among those workers, close to 5 million earn the federal minimum wage of $7.25 or just below it.

Women, blacks, Latinos and low-skilled workers would benefit from an increase in the federal minimum wage because they are more likely to be employed in lower-wage jobs in the retail or service industries.

The Republican response that raising the federal minimum wage would maim small businesses is wrong and amounts to “chicken little” scare tactics. Of the 20 or so states where the minimum wage is more than the federal rate, none have reported issues with job loss or hiring that can be directly linked to increased wages paid to workers.

We live in a new economic reality. Over the last few decades, there has been a significant decline in the median weekly earnings for individuals with a high school diploma or less, the bulk of the low-wage work force. In 2007, for example, men with a less than a high school diploma earned 28 percent less than they did in 1979.With the loss of manufacturing jobs, lower-wage jobs are a bigger part of our economy than ever before.

We ought to ensure that the wages paid to workers are in keeping with our morality, as well as the economic reality of our times.

C. Nicole Mason is executive director of the Center for Research and Policy in the Public Interest.

© 2013, C. Nicole Mason

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • The one-sided story of gay marriage

    Back in March, when gay-marriage issues exploded upon the Supreme Court, National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown didn’t appreciate how the media covered the news. His ideological brethren had to fight to get their views into stories in newspapers, online and on television.

  • For mayor of New York, lesser lights in the big city

    Anthony Weiner’s quixotic mayoral candidacy is clearly a bid for redemption, and just as clearly a way to sate his epic, boundless need to be noticed.

  • Clarence Thomas’ legal time machine zooms to 1789

    Don’t let the U.S. Supreme Court’s very contemporary cases on gene patenting and same-sex marriage fool you: At least one justice is still living in the 18th century and doesn’t care who knows it.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category