Glenn Garvin

IN MY OPINION

Referendum or not, still a bad deal

 

ggarvin@MiamiHerald.com

I don’t know whether it’s just a further escalation of the contempt in which professional sports plutocrats hold the public, or if somebody secretly slipped sodium pentothal into his water. Either way, Miami Dolphins CEO Mike Dee really let the cat out of the bag Sunday when he was asked during a television interview if a proposed $199 million taxpayer subsidy for the Dolphins’ privately owned stadium isn’t just “welfare for billionaires.”

“Just because somebody is wealthy enough doesn’t mean he should invest money in a way that is unwise,” Dee declared. He could hardly have been more straightforward: Unwise investments are strictly for the taxpaying saps. NFL and Major League Baseball owners certainly didn’t get to be billionaires by risking their own money on outlandishly expensive boondoggles. They use ours instead.

Hardly a day goes by without a gluttonous new demand for taxpayer money from these tycoon panhandlers:

• In St. Petersburg, the Tampa Bay Rays are warning that Major League Baseball may fold the team if they aren’t allowed to rip up their lease and move to a new stadium built by another city. No matter that St. Pete has done $105 million in renovations for the Rays in the past 15 years; no matter that the lease runs through 2027.

But it’s not like the Rays don’t have some helpful suggestions for how the city can recoup its $235 million in Tropicana Field: Tear it down and rent the land to some other sucker who hasn’t been listening to the Rays complain about what a lousy location it’s in, advised team vice president Michael Kalt.

• In Charlotte, the NFL Carolina Panthers last year asked the city for $80 million to refurbish their private stadium, a bit startling since the place only cost $250 million to build just 16 years earlier. When that request didn’t trigger apoplexy in any public officials, the Panthers realized they had low-balled themselves and upped the ante to $125 million.

At that point, Charlotte City Council members got tough and held a closed-door meeting with Panthers owner Jerry Richardson, where they cleverly bargained the subsidy up to $143.75 million. Now, the team plans to ask the state of North Carolina to kick in another $62 million or so. At least, that’s today’s figure.

• In Oakland, one of the brokest and most crime-ridden cities in America, city officials got rid of 138 cops in 2011 to cover a budget deficit. What they didn’t cut: a $14 million operating subsidy to the city stadium where NFL Raiders and the baseball A’s play. That was too tragic to be funny, but you’ve got to laugh at the news last week that the Raiders are closing off 10,000 seats in the stadium because attendance is so low. Those are exactly the same 10,000 seats that the city paid $200 million to build in 1996 to lure the Raiders back from Los Angeles, where they had moved in return for another sweetheart deal.

There’s no end to this field-of-schemes narrative. (OK, I confess, I stole that phrase from authors Joanna Cagan and Neil deMause, whose excellent book by that name has now evolved into the informative if horrifying fieldofschemes.com website.) Professional sports owners and their politician toadies swindle taxpayers out of their money every day all over America.

Taxpayers pay 78 percent of the bill for the average sports facility and team owners just 22 percent, Harvard urban-planning Prof. Judith Grant Long revealed in her exhaustively researched book Public/Private Partnerships for Major League Sports Facilities, released last year. She found that team owners and politicians low-ball the real cost of stadium subsidies — perhaps by as much as $10 billion in recent years — by concealing such costs as land, infrastructure, operations and lost property tax.

That figure shouldn’t come as any surprise to South Florida taxpayers, who in recent months have learned that what was supposed to be a $550 million subsidy to the Marlins’ stadium will balloon to something like $2.3 billion by the time they’ve finished paying off all the bonds required by the deal.

Nobody has yet calculated the real cost of what the Dolphins are portraying as a $199 million taxpayer gift to their stadium. (At least, nobody who’s been willing to make the numbers public.) But you can bet it will approach $1 billion before the accountants finally close their books. The Dolphins have now magnanimously said they’ll permit a public referendum on the deal. And when you go into the voting booth, I suggest you remember what Mike Dee said: This isn’t a wise investment. That’s why the Dolphins want to do it with your money instead of theirs.

Read more Glenn Garvin stories from the Miami Herald

  • IN MY OPINION

    Glenn Garvin: Welcome to ‘unwelcome’ speech on campus

    I know it was hard to hear anything last week over the cacophony of the White House roof falling over Benghazi, the IRS and spying on reporters. But still, I was surprised there wasn’t more fuss about the Obama administration’s war on Shakespeare.

  •  

300 dpi Troy Oxford color illustration of man tied to chair (torture victim) trapped inside a clenched red fist. The Dallas Morning News 2009<p>

torture dilemma illustration victim fist prison human rights; krtcrime crime; krtnational national; krtwar war; krtworld world; mctillustration; krt; krtjustice justice; rights; detainee; prisoner; CLJ; WAR; CRI; 02000000; 16000000; 02007000; 16009003; 2009; krt2009; mct mct2009 2009 da contributor coddington oxford

    IN MY OPINION

    Ugly truth: Sometimes, torture works

    John Kenneth Galbraith once observed that “the enemy of the conventional wisdom is not ideas but the march of events.” And events have finally caught up with the oft-repeated claim that torture doesn’t work and that it especially didn’t work in tracking down Osama bin Laden.

  •  

Abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell is on trial in Philadelphia.

    IN MY OPINION

    Murder? Not if you just kill a baby

    Nearly a quarter-century has passed since The Los Angeles Times published a piece by the late David Shaw, then its media critic, arguing that the anti-abortion viewpoint didn’t get fair treatment in the news media. Among the anecdotes he used to illustrate his case was that of a Boston Globe reporter who turned in a story on late-term abortions only to have an editor reject a sentence that described the operation “destroying” the fetus by “crushing forming skulls and bones.” Said the editor: “As far as I’m concerned, until that thing is born, it is really no different from a kidney; it is part of the woman’s body.” So to use the word “destroy,” the editor continued “is really to distort the issue.”

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category