Amour (PG-13)


Movie Info

Rating: * * * * 

Cast: Jean-Louis Trintignant, Emmanuelle Riva, Isabelle Huppert.

Writer-director: Michael Haneke.

Producers: Margaret Menegoz, Stefan Arndt, Michael Katz.

A Sony Pictures Classics release. Running time: 127 minutes. In French with English subtitles. Brief nudity, language. In Miami-Dade: Tower, Sunset Place; in Broward: Gateway; in Palm Beach: Palace, Delray, Shadowood.

At the start of Michael Haneke’s rigorous, heart-rending Amour, Georges (Jean-Louis Trintignant) and Anne (Emmanuelle Riva) are in their 80s but still vital and connected and in love. They are cultured and erudite — they’re retired music teachers — and their minds remain sharp and clear. They attend a piano recital by one of their former students, then come home and engage in the sort of comfortable small talk that is the privilege of people who have spent their entire lives together and haven’t grown tired of each other. “Did I mention you looked very pretty tonight?” Georges asks Anne. Over breakfast, he tells her a story from his youth she had never heard before: They’re still discovering each other, like young lovers, all these years later.

Then Anne has a stroke that paralyzes the right side of her body. She’s confined to a wheelchair, her right hand curled into a useless claw, but her intellect and speech are spared. She makes Georges promise her never to take her back to the hospital, no matter what happens. He agrees. Their middle-aged daughter (Isabelle Huppert) drops in for occasional visits to check in on Mom. Georges and Anne develop a routine — he cuts her meals for her, washes her hair, reads her the newspaper, helps her go to the bathroom. By casting Trintignant (… And God Created Woman) and Riva ( Hiroshima, Mon Amour), who have been making movies for 50 years and are familiar to many film buffs, Haneke makes us feel the couple’s history. We can remember them when they were young, which enriches the illusion of a life-long marriage.

But Anne starts growing tired of the routine, of having to depend on her husband for every little thing. “There’s no reason to go on living,” she tells Georges, “because it’s only going to get worse. I don’t want to go on. For my sake, not yours.” Pain and suffering make you selfish. But Georges won’t have any such talk. “Put yourself in my shoes,” he replies. What is he expected to do?

Then comes a second stroke, this one much more severe, and Haneke begins to turn the screws, going much further than you had imagined. Shot in long, static takes, Amour stares directly into the indignities of old age and the curse of a slow death. To say that it is difficult to watch does not begin to describe the movie. Trintignant and Riva (who earned a Best Actress Oscar nomination for her performance) are in perfect sync: They make you feel each other’s distress. Haneke ( Funny Games, Caché, The White Ribbon), who is 70, has never been one for cheery movies, but Amour is something entirely different. This one hurts more, perhaps because the filmmaker is not working within a genre as he usually does but writing from a deeper, more personal perspective.

We all struggle hard to protect the lives of the ones we love, but when couples edge into their 70s, and the kids have flown the nest, their importance to each other becomes even more critical. Georges can’t let Anne go — how could he continue without her? — but he’s prolonging her torture by keeping her alive. This is the sort of small, intimate drama about unpleasant subject matter Hollywood rarely deals with, but Haneke isn’t worried about turning off his audience, because death is something everyone has in common. It fascinates us, the way it also scares us. Will it hurt? How will it come, and when? Those things you can’t control. But love and compassion are within our reach, and despite its grueling nature, Amour feels strangely optimistic. Late in the film, Anne is leafing through some old photo albums containing pictures of herself from childhood to the present. As she turns each page, we see a new stage — adolescence, marriage, motherhood.

Of her life, she says, “It’s beautiful.” So is this movie.

Read more Reeling with Rene Rodriguez stories from the Miami Herald

 <span class="cutline_leadin">‘Life Itself’:</span> Gene Siskel, left, and Roger Ebert get into one of their countless arguments during the taping of their TV show.

    Life Itself (R)

    There are scholars who blame Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel for dumbing down film criticism with their thumbs-up, thumbs-down approach, the same way they blame Steven Spielberg and George Lucas for ruining movies with the success of Jaws and Star Wars. But Siskel and Ebert accomplished just the opposite: They popularized criticism and introduced it to the masses via their PBS show in which they spent a lot of time debating (and fighting) over movies before delivering their final, yes-or-no verdict. The first version of their show, which was titled Sneak Previews and aired on PBS in the late 1970s, led me to read Pauline Kael and Film Comment and American Film and the Miami Herald’s late, great Bill Cosford as a kid. Suddenly, my nascent love of movies blew up: Movies weren’t just something you watched for entertainment. Sometimes, there was a lot to find beneath their surface.

Caesar (Andy Serkis) leads a war against mankind in “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes.”

    Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (PG-13)

    Yawn of the Planet of the Apes — excuse me, Dawn — has a big-budget sheen, a few terrific action setpieces and some of the most jaw-dropping CGI effects to date: You will believe these apes are real (although some of them are actors wearing costumes).

Chris Evans (center) and Jamie Bell (left) are about to crack some skulls aboard a speeding bullet train in “Snowpiercer.”

    Snowpiercer (R)

    In the near future, mankind attempts to solve the growing problem of global warming by shooting a missile into space that will lower the planet’s thermostat. Instead, the device plunges Earth into another ice age, killing all life except for the people on a huge bullet train that has been circling the globe for 17 years (don’t ask, just go with it).

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category