Glenn Garvin

In my opinion

Obama’s pipe dreams and fairy tales

 

ggarvin@MiamiHerald.com

During the campaign, President Obama impressed everybody by singing an impromptu version of the old Al Green ballad Let’s Stay Together. But now the White House has switched tunes. The president’s new favorite is Young At Heart, a Frank Sinatra hit of the 1950s. You could hear it playing in the background last week when he talked about the budget: Fairy tales can come true, it can happen to you . . .

Actually, it’s not really a new tune. For years, Obama has been telling everybody that there isn’t any problem with the U.S. economy that can’t be cured by taxing the rich. And that’s his escape route from the fiscal cliff of budget cuts and tax increases schedule to hit us in January. The rich will just pay “a little bit more” and we’ll not only get that deficit under control but even have enough left over for another $200 billion stimulus program like that one that worked so well in 2009.

The song is so sweet that millions of Americans have fallen under its sway. A recent Washington Post/ABC shows that fully 60 percent of the country agrees with Obama that new taxes on the “rich” — defined in this poll as anybody with household income of $250,000 a year or more — are the solution to the deficit.

The problem is that the fairy tale that most resembles Obama’s story of the rich with bottomless pockets is Rumpelstiltskin, in which a drunken miller brags to the king that his daughter can spin gold out of straw. That story ends badly when it turns out the miller is lying. So will Obama’s.

Even if the president’s estimate that his new tax will generate $1.2 trillion over the next decade is correct (and it won’t be, because rich people are infinitely adept in figuring new ways to hide or shelter their income from the IRS), that’s not within a country mile of the $7.1 trillion that needs to be trimmed out of the deficit.

Instead of listening to Obama’s recitations of glass slippers and fairy godmothers, Americans ought to be reading Choices For Deficit Reduction, a report issued last month by the nonpartisan Congressional Budge Office. Because it came out just two days after the presidential election, when everybody was heartily sick of politics, the CBO report got comparatively little attention. But — even in the cautious language of Washington bureaucrats — it’s like a cold shower for the president’s budget fantasies.

The problems with the U.S. budget are “fundamental” and cannot be passed off with gimmicks or accounting legerdemain, the report says. Federal debt, if left unchecked, will hit 90 percent of GDP over the course of the next decade, it predicts, and the United States “would quickly head into fiscal territory unfamiliar to it and most other developed countries.”

Zeroing in on Social Security, Obamacare and entitlements as the heart of the problem, the report warns that they can be sustained “only by raising taxes substantially, relative to current polities, for a broad segment of the population.” How broad? Well, as broad as that fiscal cliff, and then some. If Congress and the president let all those Bush-era tax cuts expire next year — not just those on the rich, but all of them, including those on the middle class — it will raise only about three-quarters of the money needed for deficit reduction, the report says.

That’s because the idea of an untaxed American plutocracy — the greedy villains in Obama’s fairy tale — has about as much factual basis as unicorns. As the report notes, in 2009 the poorest fifth of U.S. households paid about 1 percent of their income in federal taxes. The middle fifth paid about 11 percent. The top fifth — households with an average income of $223,500 or above, roughly corresponding to Obama’s definition of “rich” — paid 23 percent. That means that people in those homes work already work more than a day each week just to pay the federal government. State and local taxes (including property tax) push that much closer to two days.

Rumpelstiltskin ends with the miller’s daughter making an unseemly deal with an ogre to help her turn the straw into gold. Obama’s fairy tale, if it doesn’t veer back to reality, will have a much sadder final chapter. “Federal debt cannot grow indefinitely,” the CBO report notes. “ . . . Rising debt could itself precipitate a fiscal crisis.” Lenders jack up interest rates, credit is sucked away, and the U.S. economy shrivels like a wicked witch doused with a bucket of water. And nobody lives happily ever after.

Read more Glenn Garvin stories from the Miami Herald

  •  

300 dpi Troy Oxford color illustration of man tied to chair (torture victim) trapped inside a clenched red fist. The Dallas Morning News 2009<p>

torture dilemma illustration victim fist prison human rights; krtcrime crime; krtnational national; krtwar war; krtworld world; mctillustration; krt; krtjustice justice; rights; detainee; prisoner; CLJ; WAR; CRI; 02000000; 16000000; 02007000; 16009003; 2009; krt2009; mct mct2009 2009 da contributor coddington oxford

    IN MY OPINION

    Ugly truth: Sometimes, torture works

    John Kenneth Galbraith once observed that “the enemy of the conventional wisdom is not ideas but the march of events.” And events have finally caught up with the oft-repeated claim that torture doesn’t work and that it especially didn’t work in tracking down Osama bin Laden.

  •  

Abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell is on trial in Philadelphia.

    IN MY OPINION

    Murder? Not if you just kill a baby

    Nearly a quarter-century has passed since The Los Angeles Times published a piece by the late David Shaw, then its media critic, arguing that the anti-abortion viewpoint didn’t get fair treatment in the news media. Among the anecdotes he used to illustrate his case was that of a Boston Globe reporter who turned in a story on late-term abortions only to have an editor reject a sentence that described the operation “destroying” the fetus by “crushing forming skulls and bones.” Said the editor: “As far as I’m concerned, until that thing is born, it is really no different from a kidney; it is part of the woman’s body.” So to use the word “destroy,” the editor continued “is really to distort the issue.”

  • IN MY OPINION

    Let Pollard finish his sentence

    In his book The Joys of Yiddish, Leo Rosten, struggling to define the concept of “chutzpah” to Americans, toyed with a bunch of English expressions: “gall, brazen nerve, effrontery, incredible ’guts,’ presumption plus arrogance.” In the end, he concluded no single word sufficed. Chutzpah, he wrote was “that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.”

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category