War court

Military lawyer cites civilian decision to seek dismissal of Guantánamo 9/11 tribunal

 

crosenberg@miamiherald.com

A Pentagon defense attorney is invoking a recent civilian court decision in a bid to get the military’s Sept. 11 death-penalty case dismissed at Guantánamo.

Navy Cmdr. Walter Ruiz filed the challenge Friday on behalf of Mustafa al Hawsawi, 44, who is accused of helping some of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers with financial and travel arrangements to the United States. He faces a military tribunal along with the accused 9/11 mastermind, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, 47, and three other alleged plotters.

The filing, still under seal at the Pentagon’s war court, is the first known challenge to the military commissions system since a civilian court on Oct. 16 tossed out the 2008 conviction of Osama bin Laden’s driver in a ruling that disqualified material support for terrorism as a retroactive war crime.

In it, Ruiz said, he seeks dismissal of the case and argues that the 9/11 judge, Army Col. James Pohl, should adopt the same “ex post facto” interpretation of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit when it vacated the conviction of driver Salim Hamdan.

The 9/11 accused are charged with different crimes in a more up-to-date format of the court, which was reformed by President Barack Obama after he took office. Hamdan was convicted during the Bush years. But Ruiz said in a statement describing his filing, “The Hamdan decision strikes at the heart of an already frail and unsettled military commissions system.”

A notation on the sealed docket indicated that Pentagon lawyers for another of the Sept. 11 accused, Mohammed’s nephew, Ammar al Baluchi, 35, joined in the filing.

Their military judge, Pohl, said in recent hearings at the remote U.S. Navy base in Cuba that he expected briefs on the implications of the Hamdan decision. Others are also considering the consequences of the Hamdan decision.

The Justice Department has not yet decided whether to appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court. “We continue to review the court’s opinion,” Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman, said on Monday.

So-called Australian Taliban David Hicks, who like Hamdan was repatriated not long after his conviction, has said through an attorney that he will seek to have his war crimes conviction vacated, too.

Lawyers for a former CIA captive, Majid Khan, were also researching their options, said Army Lt. Col. Jon Jackson, Khan’s Pentagon appointed attorney.

In February, Khan pleaded guilty to providing material support for terrorism and other war crimes, admitting he helped moved al Qaida money that was ultimately used in a bombing, in exchange for the possibility of eventual release from Guantánamo for his testimony at the war crimes tribunal.

Khan faces a 2016 sentencing hearing and the question is whether the material support for terror charge can simply be dropped or if his guilty plea will need to be revised.

Read more Guantánamo stories from the Miami Herald

  • GAO: Guantánamo Taliban trade without 30-day notice broke law

    The Obama administration broke the law when it failed to inform Congress of plans to release five Guantánamo Bay detainees in its May 31 for Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the Government Accountability Office has concluded.

  •  
Guantanamo Bay inmate David Hicks on Nov. 18, 2008, back in Australia.

    War court's first convict wants his get-out-of-Guantánamo guilty plea canceled

    Lawyers for so-called Australian Taliban David Hicks — the first man to trade a Guantánamo guilty plea for his freedom — appealed that conviction Wednesday in an argument that invokes a civilian-court ruling that disqualified providing material support for terrorism as a war crime.

  •  
A bus passes by Camp 6 in the early evening at the the U.S. Navy base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    Guantánamo-bound MRI spent year in storage

    The senior medical officer at Southern Command pulled the plug on plans to put an MRI at the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, after a more than year-long review by medical staff concluded it wasn’t necessary for an aging prisoner population, an Army spokesman says.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category