Movies

Robert Zemeckis takes ‘Flight’

 

The director returns to live-action film for the first time since 2000’s ‘Cast Away’

rrodriguez@MiamiHerald.com

“When are you going to make another real movie?” is the question that has been dogging Robert Zemeckis for more than a decade. Ever since he went down the animation rabbit hole to make 2004’s The Polar Express — the first film to use motion-capture technology, or mo-cap, in which real actors are filmed on bare sets and then transformed into cartoons — Zemeckis seemed to lose interest in the live-action pictures that had earned him critical and commercial success ( Back to the Future, Forrest Gump, Cast Away, Contact).

The Polar Express was a big hit, grossing more than $300 million worldwide (it was also the first film released in 3D IMAX simultaneously with multiplexes). So for the next five years, Zemeckis devoted himself to the animation format, making Beowulf (2007) and Disney’s A Christmas Carol (2009). The speculation was that Zemeckis had lost interest in traditional filmmaking and would never make a “real” movie again, at least not one starring actors made of flesh and blood.

But the director shoots down that theory. The truth is actually much simpler.

“I only made those movies using [mo-cap] because they were projects that were interesting and naturally lended themselves to be digitally animated,” he says. “I just didn’t come across a script for a live-action film that really captured me until Flight.

The movie, which opens Friday, begins with a terrifying plane crash that showcases Zemeckis’ talent for special-effects and making the impossible look real. But the rest of Flight, which is the director’s first R-rated film since 1980’s criminally underrated Used Cars, marks new territory for the filmmaker. It’s a character study of an airline pilot (played by Denzel Washington) who manages to save most of his passengers, but the ensuing investigation exposes his alcoholism and drug abuse and reveals he was drunk during the accident.

“The thing that’s interesting about substance abuse is that there are a lot of people who have occupations where they are responsible for the well-being of others,” he says. “We never tend to consider they may have personal problems — pilots, doctors, surgeons. You don’t want to go into heart surgery the day after your doctor had a horrible argument with his wife. But you never really know.

“With Flight, I saw Denzel’s character as a man with a much deeper problem than substance abuse. His issues are magnified by drug and alcohol, but they are not caused by it. He uses them to get relief from his real dilemma, which is that he’s emotionally cut off from his fellow man. He doesn’t have any relationships other than with his drug pusher. That’s what I think sets Flight apart from movies such as The Lost Weekend or Days of Wine and Roses. They are about the disease of alcoholism. Flight could have been about any disorder — a gambling problem, a sexual addiction, anything.”

Flight is unusually dark and explicit for Zemeckis, whose body of work had previously been characterized by a gentler, family-friendly veneer. But the director says he didn’t think of those things when he signed on to make the film.

“I don’t have any predisposed interests,” he says. “My previous movies cover a wide range of stories and tones. I thought the screenplay for Flight [written by John Gatins] was really bold and courageous. I loved the complexity of the entire piece. I wasn’t trying to make an R-rated movie.”

In an era where studios strongly encourage filmmakers to stay within the boundaries of a PG-13 rating to maximize box office potential, Zemeckis says he felt no pressure whatsoever to soften the edges of his movies.

“The trick is to keep your budget low,” he says. “You can’t make an R-rated adult drama for a lot of money, because the financiers won’t take the risk. But we made this movie for $30 million, and the studio says ‘OK, we can survive an R-rated movie for that price tag.’ [Distributor Paramount Pictures] loved this movie. They wanted to make this movie. They’re sad the marketplace has shifted to a point where we can’t make movies that are about anything anymore. But they never suggested we change a thing. They left us alone, and I’m really happy with what we delivered.”

Read more Reeling with Rene Rodriguez stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">‘Life Itself’:</span> Gene Siskel, left, and Roger Ebert get into one of their countless arguments during the taping of their TV show.

    Life Itself (R)

    There are scholars who blame Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel for dumbing down film criticism with their thumbs-up, thumbs-down approach, the same way they blame Steven Spielberg and George Lucas for ruining movies with the success of Jaws and Star Wars. But Siskel and Ebert accomplished just the opposite: They popularized criticism and introduced it to the masses via their PBS show in which they spent a lot of time debating (and fighting) over movies before delivering their final, yes-or-no verdict. The first version of their show, which was titled Sneak Previews and aired on PBS in the late 1970s, led me to read Pauline Kael and Film Comment and American Film and the Miami Herald’s late, great Bill Cosford as a kid. Suddenly, my nascent love of movies blew up: Movies weren’t just something you watched for entertainment. Sometimes, there was a lot to find beneath their surface.

  •  
Caesar (Andy Serkis) leads a war against mankind in “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes.”

    Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (PG-13)

    Yawn of the Planet of the Apes — excuse me, Dawn — has a big-budget sheen, a few terrific action setpieces and some of the most jaw-dropping CGI effects to date: You will believe these apes are real (although some of them are actors wearing costumes).

  •  
Chris Evans (center) and Jamie Bell (left) are about to crack some skulls aboard a speeding bullet train in “Snowpiercer.”

    Snowpiercer (R)

    In the near future, mankind attempts to solve the growing problem of global warming by shooting a missile into space that will lower the planet’s thermostat. Instead, the device plunges Earth into another ice age, killing all life except for the people on a huge bullet train that has been circling the globe for 17 years (don’t ask, just go with it).

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category