New report on Gadhafi’s death accuses Libyan rebels of executing dozens

 

McClatchy Newspapers

Rebels who ambushed Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi’s convoy not only probably killed the strongman and his son after capture but also summarily executed more than 60 of his supporters in a nearby hotel, according to the most detailed examination to date of Gadhafi’s grisly last moments after he fell into the hands of U.S.-backed rebel forces one year ago Saturday.

The report, by the advocacy group Human Rights Watch, calls the deaths “among the most clear-cut instances of extrajudicial executions carried out by opposition fighters.” The report, which was given to reporters in advance, is to be released Wednesday morning in Beirut.

Executing captives is a war crime, but Human Rights Watch blasted the transitional Libyan government for failing to conduct even a cursory investigation into the well-documented killings. The government’s failure to investigate, the report said, “shows that the new Libyan authorities have a long way to go to make their professed commitment to the rule of law and ending impunity for human rights abuses a reality.”

How Libyan authorities respond to the apparent violation also could signal how seriously they’ll take other high-profile open cases, most notably the hunt for the assailants whose attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi last month killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. While Libyan authorities have said some people have been arrested in relation to the case, little information has emerged about their identifies or what charges they might face.

Libyan officials didn’t respond to McClatchy’s requests for comment. The Human Rights Watch report says that Libyan officials responded to the group’s request for comment with a letter that dwelled on crimes of the former regime and barely mentioned the killings.

“The peaceful demonstrators – who became revolutionaries in self-defense – took special care to arrest Moammar Gadhafi alive, in order to try him in a fair trial for the crimes he committed against his own people,” the letter said.

Gadhafi and his fifth son, Mutassim, both died on the day of their capture, Oct. 20, 2011. Opposition forces detained an estimated 150 people alive after the battle and transported 70 of those to the city of Misrata to be held. But 66 of those were found dead the next day at a local hotel, according to video footage, witness testimony and firsthand observations Human Rights Watch compiled in its investigation of the rebels’ atrocities.

“This report presents evidence that Misrata-based militias, after capturing and disarming members of the Gadhafi convoy and bringing them under their total control, subjected them to brutal beatings before apparently executing dozens of them,” Human Rights Watch said. “Seven months later, Libyan authorities have neither investigated nor held accountable those who committed these crimes.”

The report provides the first detailed accounting of what happened to Gadhafi after NATO-backed rebel forces routed government forces from the Libyan capital, Tripoli, in August 2011.

According to the report, Gadhafi, Mutassim and a coterie of insiders eventually took shelter in Gadhafi’s besieged hometown of Sirte, a coastal city halfway between Tripoli and Benghazi. A witness interviewed while in detention told Human Rights Watch that conditions were so miserable under the siege that Mutassim Gadhafi, who was accustomed to a prince’s lifestyle, grew short-tempered over the lack of electricity.

As the rebel fighters battled their way deeper into Sirte on Oct. 20, Muatassim Gadhafi, in charge of the city’s defense, ordered his father’s inner circle and some remaining civilians to flee the area in a convoy of about 50 heavily armed vehicles, Human Rights Watch said.

“The escape attempt was doomed,” the report said.

The convoy was struck first by a NATO drone-fired missile, and then ran into the particularly fierce fighters from Misrata, which had suffered a merciless attack by regime forces and was eager for revenge. Airburst bombs rained down from a NATO warplane, which “incinerated dozens of Gadhafi fighters,” the report says.

The convoy’s survivors fought the militiamen while Gadhafi and some of his loyalists fled the scene, only to be captured as they tried to escape through drainage pipes underneath a major road nearby.

In a last-ditch effort to avoid capture, one of the leader’s bodyguards threw a hand grenade at the Misrata fighters, but it bounced back and exploded among Gadhafi’s circle, killing Defense Minister Abu Bakr Younis on the spot. Gadhafi and others received wounds from spraying shrapnel, the report says, but they were clearly alive upon capture.

Human Rights Watch said it remains unclear whether Gadhafi died from the rebels’ violence or the wounds he’d suffered in the ambush.

“Gadhafi was immediately set upon by the Misrata fighters, who wounded him with a bayonet in his buttocks, and then began pummeling him with kicks and blows,” Human Rights Watch said, citing witness interviews and cell-phone footage from the scene. “By the time Moammar Gadhafi was loaded into an ambulance and transported to Misrata, his body appeared lifeless.”

Gadhafi’s son met the same end, but projected defiance even in captivity. A video, which Human Rights Watch says was filmed by an associate of the Lions of the Valley militia, shows Mutassim reclining on a bed, being offered water and cigarettes.

When the captors reassure him they’ll treat his wounds, an apparent attempt to show moral superiority over a former ruler, Mutassim replies that the wounds “are my medals.” The detainee then lectures the captors for filming him and tells them to stop acting like adolescents, the report says.

His attitude enrages the militiamen, who threaten him: “You think this is child’s play? You’ll see when we are finished with you! You will see, you dog!”

Hours later, Mutassim Gadhafi was dead. Human Rights Watch viewed his body the next day, Oct. 21, and found “a large wound on his throat which did not exist in the video images of the captured Mutassim.” He also had a large gash on his lower stomach.

Human Rights Watch wasn’t allowed to turn the body over for a fuller inspection, and the government has so far refused to release the results of autopsies conducted on Gadhafi and his son, despite repeated requests from the U.N.’s Commission of Inquiry for Libya.

There are no doubts, however, about the deaths of the dozens of regime loyalists whose rotting corpses were found in the nearby Mahari Hotel. A Human Rights Watch research team counted at least 53 dead, “some with their hands still bound behind their backs,” clustered together in the hotel’s sea-view garden. Relatives already had retrieved additional corpses, locals told the team.

Using morgue records, photo identification and other tools, Human Rights Watch was able to identify many of the decomposing bodies. They included Abdelaziz Ajaj Ahmayd, a 45-year-old nephew of Gadhafi’s. Video footage shows him being questioned, slapped and spat upon, the report notes. His body was buried at the hotel as unidentified body No. 97.

Another of the corpses belonged to Ahmed Ali Yusuf al Ghariyani, 29, a soldier originally from Tawergha, a community of dark-skinned Libyans whose village was razed by Misrata rebels, who accused the locals of collaborating with the regime. The video shows Ghariyani beaten, kicked and pelted with shoes as Misrata rebels taunt him about his roots. He was buried as body No. 86.

“Establishing responsibility for the apparent execution of at least 53 and perhaps as many as 66 persons at the Mahari Hotel will require further investigation,” Human Rights Watch said. However, the report added, “it is likely that a large number of Misrata-based militiamen were involved in, and have knowledge of, the apparent executions at the Mahari Hotel.”

Email: hallam@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @hannahallam

Read more World Wires stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category