From Our Inbox

Stingy founder of ‘genius grants’ was no fan of charity

 

MacArthur’s son, John Roderick MacArthur (known as Rod), was also on the board. His legendary fights with Kirby and other board members turned early meetings into roiling, contentious knuckle bruisers. But this time the two were in agreement: In an amazing bit of cooperation, MacArthur and Kirby would share the credit for making an expansive idea of no-strings grants a reality. As Rod MacArthur explained in interviews, he wanted to free “genius” from “the bureaucratic pettiness of academe.” These grants would go to individuals, not institutions. “Albert Einstein could not have written a grant application saying he was going to discover the theory of relativity,” he said.

The first 21 MacArthur fellowships were announced in June 1981. The winners would receive, among other things, “the gift of time,” wrote Denise Shekerjian in her 1990 book, Uncommon Genius. Although the fellowships these days account for only about 5 percent of the foundation’s annual grants, they are by far the best-known of its programs.

By the end of his life, John MacArthur had mellowed a bit about what would happen after he was no longer able to call all the shots. There was no point trying to run things from the grave, he told a reporter. “You have changing times. Besides, you lay down rules and people don’t follow them. So I’ll trust to the Almighty that my trustees will do more good for the country than I would.”

Some critics charge that the foundation has funded more liberal social activism — even in its selection of fellows — than the archconservative who made the money would have tolerated. But who knows? MacArthur’s life was almost as rich in paradox as it was in dollars.

Nancy Kriplen is the author of “The Eccentric Billionaire: John D. MacArthur — Empire Builder, Reluctant Philanthropist, Relentless.” Adversary.”

© 2012, Bloomberg News

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • IRS tax-exempt rules are the real scandal

    It’s strange how “scandal” gets defined these days in Washington. At the moment, everyone is screaming about the “scandal” of the Internal Revenue Service scrutinizing conservative nonprofits before granting them tax-exempt status.

  • Putin’s power grab trumps nanotechnology

    Russian President Vladimir Putin’s changing attitude toward two giant government-led high-tech projects sends a troubling message about his third term in office: Maintaining power is more important than modernizing the economy.

  • Bring back managed trade to help workers’ safety

    If all it took were official cajoling, public shaming, technical assistance or corporate promises, factory jobs in Bangladesh and other developing countries wouldn’t be so deadly.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Videos

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category